Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jimmy Carter Using Abortion to Split Support for Republicans? (Two-faced Jimmah ALERT!!)
LifeSiteNews ^ | 8 November 2005 | John-Henry Westen

Posted on 11/07/2005 4:55:04 PM PST by Aussie Dasher

WASHINGTON, November 7, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Former US President Jimmy Carter knows how to play his audiences. Last week Carter appeared on MSNBC's Hardball slamming President George W. Bush in a fashion perhaps never before seen from an ex-President, but also last week Carter spoke to the conservative Washington Times newspaper, revealing his apparently new-found strong pro-life views. Not surprisingly, Carter did not mention his anti-abortion stand with Hardball's Chris Matthews.

Stephen F. Hayward, PhD., who last year wrote a book on Carter noted Carter's political exploitation of abortion in the past. In an interview with National Review, Hayward recalled of Carter's abortion stand: "The 1976 campaign was the first national election after the Roe decision, and the politics of the issue were still sorting themselves out. Remember that Gerald Ford was pro-abortion, while many Democrats, including Sargent Shriver, one of Carter's rivals, were pro-life. In the Iowa caucuses, which Carter put on the map for the first time, Carter told Catholic audiences (and a gathering of bishops) that he opposed abortion and supported legislation to restrict it, thus cutting into Shriver's support. But he told feminist groups at the same time that he supported abortion rights (indeed, he had done so as governor of Georgia)."

The impetus for his round of press meetings, the newly released book, "Our Endangered Values: America's Moral Crisis" slams the Bush administration particularly in those areas the administration is most open to criticism from moral conservatives, namely Iraq.

However the Washington Times interview he did not touch on the anti-Bush nature of the book. Instead, Carter said, "I've never been convinced, if you let me inject my Christianity into it, that Jesus Christ would approve abortion."

Carter emphasized that using the pro-abortion yardstick as a measure to test the reliability of a judicial candidate does not accurately reflect American views. "I have always thought it was not in the mainstream of the American public to be extremely liberal on many issues," Carter said. "I think our party's leaders - some of them - are overemphasizing the abortion issue."

Robert Knight of Concerned Women for America's Culture and Family Institute said Carter's new stand was "astonishing". Knight told LifeSiteNews.com, "Whether it is a true change of heart or a calculated political risk, only Mr. Carter knows."

However, Knight said, "his remarks on abortion are welcome." It shows, said Knight, "that the Democrats understand that the rigid pro-abortion stance is a loser and that the American people are not with them."

In his new book, Carter slams Bush for "fundamentalism" and criticizes the Bush administration for "an unprecedented and overt ... merger of the church and state, of religion and politics."

In 2000, LifeSiteNews.com reported that Carter left the Southern Baptist Convention. Carter said the Southern Baptist Convention, which has almost 16 million members, has adopted policies "that violate the basic premises of my Christian faith," including a denominational statement that prohibits women from being pastors and tells wives to be submissive to their husbands.

However, Morris H. Chapman, chairman of the SBC Executive Committee, noted that Carter, who was originally embraced by Baptist conservatives in 1976 when he publicly described himself as a born-again Christian, lost favour with conservative Christians after such actions as appointing Sarah Weddington - the lead attorney in the landmark 1973 abortion case, Roe v. Wade - to the White House position when he was assistant to the president.

Carter has distinguished himself, following his short stint as leader of the United States, through his charitable initiatives, prime among them Habitat for Humanity. Conservatives, however, continue to be wary of him because in 1992, for example, he agreed to serve as honorary co-chair of a fund-raising dinner for one of the nation's leading homosexual advocacy groups, the Human Rights Campaign. In doing so, Carter became the first president of the United States to associate himself with a fund-raising effort in the homosexual "community".

Knight hopes, that if Carter has altered his views on the culture of death he will also change his view on the associated cultural woes of the homosexual agenda and the porn culture.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; babykiller; backflip; homosexualagenda; jimmah; jimmycarter; leftistapostasy; leftistdeception; leftistidiot; leftistliar; leftistweenie; twofaced
It would be a brave man or woman to take Jimmah on face-value - or his word!!!
1 posted on 11/07/2005 4:55:06 PM PST by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Hayward's book about Carter was excellent.

Carter told his biographer, Douglas Brinkley, that American foreign policy restrictions "did not apply to me." That is, of course, not correct. When he went to the Middle East in 1986, he sent the State Department a false itinerary that omitted mention of his planned trip to Damascus to see Assad.

Saudi $$ funded Carter's library; it's a matter of public record, but naturally the Old Media types don't think it's important to mention.

Douglas Brinkley wrote that Carter involved himself in fund raising operations for the PLO. Arafat lost millions in support from Arab nations because they did NOT support Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait and Arafat did support it. Carter directly appealed to Saudi Arabia to restore funds to the PLO after the Kuwait matter, even as it became evident through Freedom of Information Act requests that Arafat personally ordered the assassination of two American diplomats in 1973. Arafat also sponsored the Black September militants who hijacked and blew up several passenger airliners in the desert that same year. This obviously did not matter to Carter.

Carter injected himself in the Somalia mess during Clinton's term. When the White House nixed Carter's ambition to get involved, Carter simply invited a Somalian delegation representing the wanted warlord Mohammed Farah Aidid to visit him at the Carter Center in Atlanta. Aidid was the warlord US Army Rangers were hunting in 1993 during the Black Hawk Down incident and his goons killed 17 American soldiers. Carter criticized UN attempts to capture Aidid as "regrettable."

Despite opposition in the State Department and National Security Council, Clinton gave Carter permission to negotiate in the Haiti mess in 1994. The only thing Carter was authorized to negotiate was the departure of Cedras from Haiti and how that would come about. Carter immediately began negotiating his own policy when he arrived in Port-au-Prince and drafted an agreement promising the lifting of US trade embargo and made no mention about restoring Aristide.

Carter called CNN and arranged a live p ress conference to give details of the deal before even informing the White House. It infuriated the Clinton administration, naturally, and was against all protocol and policy.

In the matter of Bosnia and ethnic cleansing, Carter complained that the American public was only getting one side of the story and he actually sided with the chief architect of ethnic cleansing in Bosnia, Radovan Karadzic. This was too much for even the liberal media and the New Republic editorialized that Carter was a menace, an indecent farce and suggested that a "statue of the vain, meddling, amoral American fool should stand in every ethnically cleansed square."

There is an entire large section of the book about how Carter undermined the Clinton administration in the North Korea matter and we now find ourselves facing a nuclear armed North Korea as a direct result of Carter's intervention and Clinton's inattention to the matter. Carter personally dropped demands that UN inspections resume and that N. Korea surrender its fuel rods. Kim agreed to Carter's proposal, naturally. In addition, Carter never mentioned Kim's human rights violations in the last century. It's an astounding section of the book and condemns Carter in the strongest words possible.

In 1995 Carter phoned Castro which infuriated Clinton and drew an enraged phone call from Gore. Contacting Castro without the approval of the US government was a big no no.

Carter gave four prime time televised speeches to the Cuban people while there and embarrassed both the US government AND Castro ( a double whammy). The details are too long to go into here.

All of the above prompted a Time magazine columnist to write that some of Carter's Lone Ranger work has taken him dangerously close to the neighborhood of what we used to call treason.

Carter also made direct contact with Soviet officials and tried to subvert Reagan's anti-communist policies.

There are numerous instances of when Carter was running for Governor and then President that he used race baiting tactics...on both sides of the fence. At times he seemed to be appealing to racists and at other times he seemed to be calling his opponents racists. There are numerous instances of this from both commercials he ran and flyers he distributed. At the time, he was called the meanest politician in American history. He has since, of course, changed his image with the help of a PR firm.
2 posted on 11/07/2005 5:02:05 PM PST by Peach (The Dems enabled Able Danger. 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Carter did not mention his anti-abortion stand with Hardball's Chris Matthews.

Because the Dems are scared to death to say the approve of abortions

Howard Dean is now calling it Healthcare for women

3 posted on 11/07/2005 5:03:57 PM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Jimmy Carter for President.

You know that's what he really wants.


4 posted on 11/07/2005 5:04:23 PM PST by mhx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhx

Perhaps Lard Ass could be V-P?


5 posted on 11/07/2005 5:05:36 PM PST by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

strong anti-abortion message??

every time i've heard/read him speak directly on abortion he always qualifies his statement that Jesus Christ would not approve of abortion.

the most fanatical pro-abortionist could make that statement.


6 posted on 11/07/2005 5:16:05 PM PST by kpp_kpp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

There isn't a day that passes by that I don't think of deeds of this despicable man, and what the world would have been like if he was never elected President.


7 posted on 11/07/2005 5:24:18 PM PST by parisa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

LOL! Like anybody watches Hardball.


8 posted on 11/07/2005 5:31:06 PM PST by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I believed him when he said he has been well treated by G.H.W. Bush, but received the worst treatment by Billy Clinton.


9 posted on 11/07/2005 5:33:56 PM PST by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Now that's a ticket the Democratic party can get behind.


10 posted on 11/07/2005 5:46:47 PM PST by mhx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

Does Crissy Matthews wear a rug?


11 posted on 11/07/2005 6:11:51 PM PST by mothball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Too bad Miss Lillian didn't have a "choice".


12 posted on 11/07/2005 6:59:54 PM PST by clintonh8r (Civil War II. Are you ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I still say Billy was the smarter of the two.


13 posted on 11/07/2005 7:21:11 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth (The problem with being a 'big tent' Party is that the clowns are seated with the paying customers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson