Posted on 11/07/2005 11:36:04 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Liberals in America are trying to take over the White House and dictate to a sitting president who should be on his personal staff. The media follows the president to foreign soil to hound him about "Plamegate," and all the while, parts of Europe are coming unglued. The liberal media in America barely mentions it. The media carefully sidesteps the fact that the riots in France are Islam-driven. The riots in Denmark are barely mentioned. The Muslim riots will spread and demands for Muslim autonomy will be made. This is just the beginning of the war for Europe. The second phase of the Islamification of Europe has begun and all the mindless journalists care about is that "Scooter Libby" pled innocent at his first court hearing.
On the surface, it seems that the youth of Paris are just out raising hell and burning cars for the fun of it, but that isn't what is happening at all. The suburbs of Paris are burning and it isn't because of some bored kids. What no one seems to want to mention is the fact that is it angry Muslims who are burning the city every night. Cars are overturned and the violence is escalating. A woman on crutches exiting a bus was doused with gasoline and set ablaze. These "boys" have now moved from burning cars to burning people.
The story was reported that two Muslim boys were trying to avoid a police checkpoint and decided to hide in a high-voltage electric substation. The boys were killed when they touched something they should not have touched. The police deny that they were chasing the boys, but Muslims have used this as an excuse to tear up schools, trains, shops, and any car that dares venture near them and their "turf."
Islam seems to own the suburbs of Paris and it's unlikely it will give them back to France. It is equally unlikely that France will demand the suburbs be returned to French control. Chirac seems befuddled and unable to regain control of streets of his own country. This is just what Islam was hoping would happen.
Many French authorities seem bewildered and unable to deal with the uprising. What did they expect? When a country opens its borders and allows Muslims to pour in without demanding that they accept the local culture, riots should not have been a surprise. The vast majority of Muslims that have immigrated to European countries come with no intention of blending with the locals. They have come with a purpose and that purpose is to take over the country. Most Muslim immigrants gather together, live in poverty, are unemployed and living on the dole with nothing to do but reproduce, get angry, and be taught endlessly that Islam will make it better. Of all the countries in Europe, France has probably been the most accommodating. This is its reward.
France is witnessing a skirmish. A "feeling out" of what the French authorities will do and how this uprising will be dealt with. So far, the Muslims are winning. Some arrests have been made but it seems as though the French are just hoping the rioting Muslims will just get tired and go home. So far, that doesn't seem to be happening. The violence is spreading and along with the fire bombs, guns are being used.
Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin stated, "The return to calm and the restoration of order are the priority -- our absolute priority." Unfortunately, de Villepin offered no solution to the problem. What the French should do is deport each and every one of the rioters and their families back from whence they came--but they won't. That wouldn't be "politically correct." Meeting a crisis head-on just isn't the French way. The government will try to "reason" with the rioters to get in touch with their anger so that their anger can be understood. Muslims will make demands and those demands will be met. Round one: Islam wins.
The French will blame themselves for their lack of sensitivity to the Islamic way of life for the unrest. After consultations with Islamic leaders it will be decided that expecting Muslims to become French was an infringement on their rights. In the end, it will be the French that change, not the Muslims. Once again, Islam will be rewarded for violence and its cause will be advanced.
It is even worse in Arhus, Denmark. Muslim youth rioters in Arhus have openly declared war on the Danish government. The rioters chanted, "This land belongs to us!" Meeting with reporters, the spokesman told reporters that Muslims were tired of being oppressed and harassed. With their faces covered to hide their identities, they gave an ominous warning to the local police: "The police has to stay away. This is our area. We rule this place." And it seems they do.
The Danish paper, Jyllands Post, added fuel to the fire by daring to publish some editorial cartoons that involved Mohammed. Any insult to Mohammed or Islam is punishable by death. In typical Muslim fashion, mindless fury took control and their own neighborhoods were torched and fearful firefighters refused to fight the fires. So far, the only weapons the Muslims used have been firebombs and rocks, but this too will change as they realize the terror they can put in the average Danish citizen's heart. If the police and firefighters won't enter Muslim neighborhoods, the Muslims will begin to take over more neighborhoods. Soon, in the heart of Denmark, there will be something rotten--Lebanon.
Soon, there could be Muslim uprisings all over Europe. It's unlikely there will be riots in the old eastern block countries. These countries simply won't tolerate that kind of behavior and Islam knows that. One thing Islamics know how to do is pick their targets. Western Europe is weak.
Islamics do make mistakes as they did when America was attacked. After two decades of weakness, Islamics did not expect the reaction to the attack that they got. Genuinely surprised by the attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq, Islamics had to fall back and regroup. Now, they use our own left and the obliging media to help Islam win the war. After all, why expend money and blood on another frontal attack when American senators like Kerry, Kennedy, and Boxer will do the fighting for them? Islamics have learned how powerful the peaceniks are in America. All Islamics have to do is wait and be patient.
Time is short for many European countries. How these Muslim uprisings are dealt with will tell the tale. If the trouble makers are thrown out of the country or in prison, there is hope. If the governments scramble to accommodate Islam at the expense of their respective cultures, the war will be lost. Instead of the Nazi salute, Europe's salute will be bowing to Mecca. Is there much difference between the two?
--------------------
Note -- The opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, and/or philosophy of GOPUSA.
Cartwright! Cartwright!
I was thinking the very same thing.
"The French will blame themselves for their lack of sensitivity to the Islamic way of life for the unrest. After consultations with Islamic leaders it will be decided that expecting Muslims to become French was an infringement on their rights. In the end, it will be the French that change, not the Muslims. Once again, Islam will be rewarded for violence and its cause will be advanced."
This sums up nicely the strategy for taking over a guilt-ridden, self-hating, yet powerful and dominant liberal culture by a poor, proud and determined minority with strong convictions.
I guess we now know why the libs have been desparately trying to disarm US citizens. They (the libs) are nothing more than islamofascist espionage agents. I believe the penalty for espionage in time of war is the firing squad.
The real muslim forces will be augmented by their recruits they have met in prison or have wandered into the mosques seeking their "Roots" who have names lie TuPak, Mohammad and Abdul and Barak.
Compare the way France handled the outbreak of the Algerian war to the way they are handling a warfare outbreak in their own homeland. The time difference is about 50 some years. Note the quotes from the French Leaders in the past.
Excerpted from Wikipedia Free Encylopedia
In the early morning hours of November 1, 1954, FLN maquisards (guerrillas) launched attacks in various parts of Algeria against military installations, police posts, warehouses, communications facilities, and public utilities. From Cairo, the FLN broadcast a proclamation calling on Muslims in Algeria to join in a national struggle for the "restoration of the Algerian state, sovereign, democratic, and social, within the framework of the principles of Islam." The French minister of interior, socialist François Mitterrand, responded sharply that "the only possible negotiation is war." It was the reaction of Premier Pierre Mendès-France, who only a few months before had completed the liquidation of France's empire in Indochina, that set the tone of French policy for the next five years. On November 12, he declared in the National Assembly: "One does not compromise when it comes to defending the internal peace of the nation, the unity and integrity of the Republic. The Algerian departments are part of the French Republic. They have been French for a long time, and they are irrevocably French… Between them and metropolitan France there can be no conceivable secession."
Would you believe one year (or less.)
"YES....BUT WE HAVE GROWN SOFT
FOLKS IN THE 40S AND 50S WOULD HAVE NEVER TOLERATED THE CRAP ARE ASKED TO DAY IN DAY OUT
THERE ARE FREEPERS WHO THINK WE SHOULD HAVE OPEN DOORS TO MOON ROCKIES"
Less then half of the country on the left have gone soft. This is America and we should welcome those who want to become part of the American dream. It is the sharing of the dream of true freedom that made and us makes us great. However, we can pick and choose the groups of peoples we allow in or allow to stay. This objective can be managed properly. Those groups must also contribute to our society. The incentive to integrate into our society is gone, it is too easy and these groups get benefits and abuse the system.
"Oh they'll spill out into the streets for burning and looting parties. They'll have arms (what do you think they do in those mosques that have sprouted up all around America?)and they'll shoot at us."
Yes that is true, they may shoot at us. In fact, the DC sniper was an example of such an event. The violent movement of Islamic factions will stay a minority in this country in my opinion. And when they do form gangs and start shooting at us? We will kill them. I try and put it into perspective and read some history. It's a brave, scary new world but it is a heck of a lot safer then in ancient times of maurading armies. An enemy that is hiding within won't stay hidden for long. It is 280 million of us and 10,000 of them, keep that in mind.
"The difference between Europe and the US is 200 million gun owners."
Exactly Tonto.
You'd better care. France has nukes!
I do care--I was quoting a guy who didn't.
yeah I hope that was a misprint LOL
[...I do care--I was quoting a guy who didn't...]
Please forgive me Dunstan. I had not seen the nuke point made yet. Please forgive.
RE: Your home page. Did you know that C.S. Lewis' "Screwtape Letters" was given to the British troops during WWI to boost troop morale?
Te absolvo.
RE: Your home page. Did you know that C.S. Lewis' "Screwtape Letters" was given to the British troops during WWI to boost troop morale?
No, I didn't know that, and thanks for telling me. This would, of course, never be permitted nowadays. (And I think you meant WWII.)
Ever heard John Cleese's recording of Screwtape Letters? Cleese was perfect for Screwtape.
[...John Cleese's recording of Screwtape Letters?...]
Vouset un bon homme. En chante.
I would like to hear Cleese's version of Screwtape. Wonder where I can get it. You are correct. It was Churchhill who asked Lewis to write something to encourage the troops. Screwtape was the result. Ah. Un Outre Temp.
Quel Domage.
(French is rusty. Please forgive the spelling)
We should begin seeing less suicide bomber action. Word has gotten out that their excuse for a "heaven" is running out of virgins.
What a contradiction in everything is a koran reading, bomb detonating mooslem. They want to die and we want to kill them.
But they don't eat pork.
I got my copy some years ago on audiocassette, but I have forgotten from where--it was one of those unsolicited catalogs that turn up in a mailbox and never reappear. I'm sure it's out on CD nowadays, but I don't know where you'd find it. No doubt amazon.com would be happy to direct you to it.
Screwtape - John Cleese.
I tried to produce a play version a few years ago. It was not a very good script. The writer completely lost the Spiritual nuance. Now if G. K. Chesterton had written the play... now that would have been amazing. Wonder if Lewis ever pitched the idea to Chesterton?
It's more than just "less than half".
Many on the right are downright eat up with political correctness over immigration...this administration por ejemplo.
The only Muslims we should let in are those whose lives are in danger for having helped us....like Kurds here in Nashville
I saw some scarved women today following their men around with eyes averted looking downward. I'm all for the man being hombre of the house but I loathe that scared pup shite most of these Muslim women have....and usually from some gimpy little swarthy guy who couldn't bust a grape.
We have seen the consequences of relaxed immigration but it will take a Hiroshima level cataclysm to wake up our sorriest generation asses.
Such an approach is a sure fire recipe for disaster when facing an enemy that only recognizes strenght, power and the ability to take on the threats and anarchy quickly, properly and permanently.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.