Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gondring
That uranium stockpile was already tagged by the UN, though.

Why is that relevant? Did Iraq have 500 tons of uranium or not?

19 posted on 11/05/2005 8:22:56 AM PST by ez ("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - from Milton's 'Paradise Lost ')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: ez

Since it's from Gulf War I days, and it was under UN inspection, then it wasn't material that Saddam had gone out looking for since the cease fire and it wasn't being used in any WMD program. That would leave no justification for invasion, as it's not relevant to the UN Resolutions, and not like we didn't know it was there.


28 posted on 11/05/2005 9:29:04 AM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: ez

"Did Iraq have 500 tons of uranium or not?" The UN was too happy with their oil-for-food kickbacks to care, weren't they? Our planes were shot at over 700 times by Saddam as well during the ceasefire. 700 more reasons to end the ceasefire.


34 posted on 11/05/2005 10:20:11 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March ("Every time the court veers left, the people are overwhelmingly opposed." [Laura Ingraham])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: ez
Why is that relevant? Did Iraq have 500 tons of uranium or not?

And for what?

40 posted on 11/05/2005 10:41:10 AM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson