Skip to comments.
Movement To Ban Firearms In San Francisco
KGO-TV (San Francisco) ^
| 11/2/05
| Carolyn Tyler
Posted on 11/04/2005 9:09:21 AM PST by kiriath_jearim
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: kiriath_jearim
Maybe they should ban murder, rape, burglery, robbery and jaywalking while they're at it.
21
posted on
11/04/2005 9:41:35 AM PST
by
Skooz
(If you think Adolf Hitler was a Christian, you are a blithering idiot.)
To: Drew68
But what's more dead when compared to the nice warm fuzzy the extreme left will feel?
22
posted on
11/04/2005 9:41:46 AM PST
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: kiriath_jearim
This is all for show, as far as I can tell. State law forbids such a local ordinance.
23
posted on
11/04/2005 9:43:19 AM PST
by
B Knotts
To: little jeremiah
They can't believe this. No one could be that deluded.You are obviouly not a San Francisco resident.
24
posted on
11/04/2005 9:44:03 AM PST
by
GSWarrior
(Proudly posting bandwidth-consuming images since November 2000.)
To: kiriath_jearim
But in Bayview Hunters Point, a neighborhood plagued with violence,This sentence is incorrect.
Hunters Point is plagued with violent criminals, not "violence".
The writer makes it sound as if "violence" is some abstract reality that exists on its own, without any human involvement.
The writer is an idiot, or worse, a propagandist.
25
posted on
11/04/2005 9:45:57 AM PST
by
Disambiguator
(Making accusations of racism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.)
To: kiriath_jearim
So let me understand this...
Guns are bad and dangerous and lead to death...
But this kind of behaviour...
...is safe, healthy, and does not lead to death of the body as well as the spirit?
I am so confused!
I need to find my way back thru the looking glass...this worlds is way too warped for me!
26
posted on
11/04/2005 10:07:34 AM PST
by
Itzlzha
("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
To: kiriath_jearim
Shawn Richard, Brothers Against Guns: "Uzis or Mac 10s, stuff like that is being used on the streets of San Francisco that are only supposed to be used for the war. How are they getting in here? So I'm supportive of this ban on these guns." I know! I know! We can just pass a law making illegal to kill other people and solve the whole problem!
What a pathetic idiot if he believes that making guns llegal in SF will stop CRIMINALS from using them.
But, then, if you are can be thrown in prison for a single shot .22, why not own a machine gun?
27
posted on
11/04/2005 10:12:45 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Abathar
"Chris Daly, San Francisco supervisor: "If we can get handguns, some of the handguns out of the hands of some of the criminals, then we'll make a small dent in some of the homicides and that is the intent of this legislation." "
I'm sure this is the one law these criminals will obey.
28
posted on
11/04/2005 10:19:54 AM PST
by
gc4nra
( this tag line protected by Kimber and the First Amendment (I voted for McClintock))
To: Drew68
I love this law, it will make L.A. a safe place to live when all the bad guys move to EPSF(easy pickin's, san francisco)!
Couldn't happen to a nicer place!
29
posted on
11/04/2005 10:23:30 AM PST
by
gc4nra
( this tag line protected by Kimber and the First Amendment (I voted for McClintock))
To: Drew68
"But this isn't about fighting crime, is it?"Exactly right! It is about fighting "icky" things.
30
posted on
11/04/2005 10:35:33 AM PST
by
Designer
(Just a nit-pick'n and chagrin'n)
To: kiriath_jearim
"If we can get handguns, some of the handguns out of the hands of some of the criminals, then we'll make a small dent in some of the homicides and that is the intent of this legislation."
RIGHT.
And if we could get all the cars off the road. we wouldn't have any accidents!!!!
31
posted on
11/04/2005 10:38:13 AM PST
by
ZULU
(Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
To: kiriath_jearim
She would be forced to give up her gun if Proposition H passes.San Francisco needs Preparation H, not Proposition H.
To: kiriath_jearim
"If we can get handguns, some of the handguns out of the hands of some of the criminals, then we'll make a small dent in some of the homicides and that is the intent of this legislation." Here is logical fallacy #1. The gun ban will not affect criminals because they by definition do not obey the laws. The criminals will be the only people with guns and they will be having a heyday. The City of San Francisco should be ready for the consequences held accountable for the results of this decision.
33
posted on
11/04/2005 11:32:40 AM PST
by
ArmyTeach
(Pray daily for our troops...)
To: kiriath_jearim
Another Paris/New Orleans in the making. SF will make yet another good object lesson in the fruits of socialism. (no pun intended. but not bad)
34
posted on
11/04/2005 12:57:59 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(Some people seem to think I'm Super Man.)
To: Semper Paratus
Ironic that I bought my most evil of firearms, an AR-10 in San Francisco in 1999. I had to send it out of state when Gray-Out Davis passed a mandatory registration law for "assault" weapons. I got it back when I left that pit and now live in Alaska where guns a part of the culture. Sodom on the bay never disappoints me.
To: GSWarrior
To: B Knotts
This is all for show, as far as I can tell. State law forbids such a local ordinance. I've not heard that the state preemption statute has been repealed. Only the Calif. state legislature can enact gun control legislation. But, with the lawlessness exhibited by city and county government, some poor soul will be arrested and/or fined under this ordinance and must seek justice in California courts--always a crap shoot.
To: kiriath_jearim
Shawn Richard, Brothers Against Guns: "Uzis or Mac 10s, stuff like that is being used on the streets of San Francisco that are only supposed to be used for the war. How are they getting in here? So I'm supportive of this ban on these guns."They're ALREADY illegal in the state of California, you dumb twerp. So SF passes a further ban, big deal. It might as well be Double Secret Probation for all the good it'll do.
38
posted on
11/04/2005 5:58:05 PM PST
by
John Jorsett
(scam never sleeps)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson