Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives, Some Blacks, Outraged Over Milwaukee Paper's Editorial
Editor and Publisher ^ | 11/3/05 | Joe Strupp

Posted on 11/04/2005 7:16:54 AM PST by Jean S

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: JeanS
The extreme illogic exhibited by people like Pimentel illustrates why the left is totally clueless and has to be fought on everything. For the life of him Pimentel cannot see what the fuss is all about. According to Pimentel a judge's decisions should reflect his skin color or sex and not be based on an objective sober look at the constitution.

What Pimentel is really saying is that (1) the constitution is not a fixed set of rules but something that is only for advisory purposes and (2) the real purpose of judges is to satisfy the desires of the particular ethnic or gender the judge represents. Pimentel sees nothing wrong with this "logic". And the left wonders why some people see them as totally bereft of common sense.

By the way I used to read the Journal regularly. Stanford has always been a racist and a race-baiter. Nothing's changed since I quit reading the Journal ten years ago.

21 posted on 11/04/2005 8:54:19 AM PST by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
We just said his views are not within black mainstream thought."

Apparently they, like all liberals, think mainstream America is that small group of Communism adorers.

Blacks should be thankful that Thomas does not represent the thoughts of the loud black activists who are living off the carcasses of the others whom they keep impoverished and ignorant. Victims of all stripes are to be denied role models lest they catch a clue.

Diversity is important only if the SC becomes a Super Legislative Body and the Constitution becomes a living document. That is what the fight is all about.

22 posted on 11/04/2005 9:14:28 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
We just said his views are not within black mainstream thought.

When was the last time anyone suggested that a nominee held views that "are not within white mainstream thought"?

23 posted on 11/04/2005 10:21:46 AM PST by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

This paper sucks.


I'd know. I have to read this stupid piece of trash on SUndays becuase it's our only print media. Isn't that a monopoly???


24 posted on 11/04/2005 10:57:21 AM PST by DTwistedSisterS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy

Yeah, we do have a lot of black people. Although, once Michael McGee or Willie Hines wins Mayor (because whites are fractured over Dem vs. Rep), this city is Detroit II. McGee already tried ot give blacks reparations


25 posted on 11/04/2005 10:58:57 AM PST by DTwistedSisterS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MinnesotaLibertarian
Wisconsin Demographics. About 4.7M white people, 304,000 blacks for the whole state, according to 2000 census.
26 posted on 11/04/2005 10:59:47 AM PST by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
"A reasonable person could surmise that, saying he would weaken the voting rights act, outlaw affirmative action, dilute black voting power, make it difficult to prove various kinds of discrimination, and approve cruel and unusual punishment."

What does cruel and unusual punishment have to do with it. Is he saying that this issue disproportionately effects blacks because they commit more crimes. Uh oh. Isn't that what Bill Bennett said that caused liberals to go berserk.
27 posted on 11/04/2005 11:05:35 AM PST by half-cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Pimentel said he had no regrets about running the editorial, and had no plans for a column or other explanatory note about it. "I let it in as a statement of fact," he said of the editorial. "That Clarence Thomas did not represent mainstream black thought. I think that is demonstrably true if you look at his rulings.…"

Someone in another thread commented on this train of thought. Supreme Court justices aren't there to REPRESENT anyone. They are their to render decisions based on law, not feelings.
28 posted on 11/04/2005 11:16:56 AM PST by thompsonsjkc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

ping


29 posted on 11/04/2005 3:53:05 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Oh, I see you posted this! There's a duplicate post that I pinged everyone to, before you pinged me. (Milwguy)

We'll make them aware of the situation, either way. Jerks!


30 posted on 11/04/2005 3:55:47 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

I keep pointing out that as Protestant white males, Stevens and Souter should have asterisks, since they hardly represent mainstream white male Protestant thought in this country.

Ginsburg and O'Conner hardly represented the mainstream thought of married women in this country, so their status as married women deserves an asterisk, too.

How stupid is this all going to get?


31 posted on 11/04/2005 4:17:45 PM PST by Agrarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Miss affirmative action SCOTUS judge supports affirmative action? Who would have thought?


32 posted on 11/04/2005 5:32:51 PM PST by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
 
"We just said his views are not within black mainstream thought."
Bull
If one looks at studies done over the years, they will notice that the majority of blacks hold values that are traditionally thought to be representative of the GOP. Tough on crime, high on faith, family values etc.
I think Justice Thomas is exactly in line with black mainstream (silent majority) thought.

!

 

33 posted on 11/04/2005 8:37:55 PM PST by HawaiianGecko (Facts are neither debatable nor open to "I have a right to this opinion" nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson