Posted on 11/04/2005 7:16:54 AM PST by Jean S
What Pimentel is really saying is that (1) the constitution is not a fixed set of rules but something that is only for advisory purposes and (2) the real purpose of judges is to satisfy the desires of the particular ethnic or gender the judge represents. Pimentel sees nothing wrong with this "logic". And the left wonders why some people see them as totally bereft of common sense.
By the way I used to read the Journal regularly. Stanford has always been a racist and a race-baiter. Nothing's changed since I quit reading the Journal ten years ago.
Apparently they, like all liberals, think mainstream America is that small group of Communism adorers.
Blacks should be thankful that Thomas does not represent the thoughts of the loud black activists who are living off the carcasses of the others whom they keep impoverished and ignorant. Victims of all stripes are to be denied role models lest they catch a clue.
Diversity is important only if the SC becomes a Super Legislative Body and the Constitution becomes a living document. That is what the fight is all about.
When was the last time anyone suggested that a nominee held views that "are not within white mainstream thought"?
This paper sucks.
I'd know. I have to read this stupid piece of trash on SUndays becuase it's our only print media. Isn't that a monopoly???
Yeah, we do have a lot of black people. Although, once Michael McGee or Willie Hines wins Mayor (because whites are fractured over Dem vs. Rep), this city is Detroit II. McGee already tried ot give blacks reparations
ping
Oh, I see you posted this! There's a duplicate post that I pinged everyone to, before you pinged me. (Milwguy)
We'll make them aware of the situation, either way. Jerks!
I keep pointing out that as Protestant white males, Stevens and Souter should have asterisks, since they hardly represent mainstream white male Protestant thought in this country.
Ginsburg and O'Conner hardly represented the mainstream thought of married women in this country, so their status as married women deserves an asterisk, too.
How stupid is this all going to get?
Miss affirmative action SCOTUS judge supports affirmative action? Who would have thought?
"We just said his views are not within black mainstream thought."
Bull If one looks at studies done over the years, they will notice that the majority of blacks hold values that are traditionally thought to be representative of the GOP. Tough on crime, high on faith, family values etc.
I think Justice Thomas is exactly in line with black mainstream (silent majority) thought.
|
||
!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.