Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

There ain't enough californians moved here yet for this one to fly. Austin will be disappointed.
1 posted on 11/03/2005 10:26:43 AM PST by texas_mrs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: texas_mrs

I already voted against sodomite marriage. Early voting.


2 posted on 11/03/2005 10:27:57 AM PST by TXBSAFH ("I would rather be a free man in my grave then living as a puppet or a slave." - Jimmy Cliff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs; r-q-tek86; Maximus of Texas; PaulaB

Texas Ping!!


4 posted on 11/03/2005 10:29:21 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (People too weak to follow their own dreams, will always find a way to discourage yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs
"We are making a horse race out of it for the first time in any state," said Glen Maxey, an openly gay former legislator...

It's good that they are making a "horse race" out of it because it's not much of a political race. He gotta be taking some industrial strength drugs if he really believes it's going to be even close.

5 posted on 11/03/2005 10:30:13 AM PST by ladtx ("It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it." -- -- General Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs

People that have anal sex then oral sex and ingest human feces as a way of life should be able to get married. They are just like everyone else. Really. /s off


6 posted on 11/03/2005 10:31:11 AM PST by isthisnickcool (Eternity? Smoking or nonsmoking?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs


Two guys getting married and adopting little boys...

....Awwww,ain`t that sweet ! ?


7 posted on 11/03/2005 10:32:33 AM PST by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs
There ain't enough californians moved here yet for this one to fly. Austin will be disappointed.

Won't make any difference what the VOTE is, the activists already have the lawsuit prepared and will shop it to a GAY FRIENDLY court. Why vote, until the courts get "righted".

8 posted on 11/03/2005 10:33:41 AM PST by p23185
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs

How has the infusion of so many Catholic Mexicans into Texas affected legislation such as this? Surely the great majority are pro-family.


10 posted on 11/03/2005 10:34:08 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs

Here in Walker County the total off election number is only a little over 1,000.
When I voted today they already had over 1,000 voting.
I voted yes on 2, 4 and 7.


14 posted on 11/03/2005 10:38:52 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (I shot an error into the air. It's still going everywhere. R. A. HEINLEIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs

The content is not so great, but the proof reading is worse.
There's a typo:

"interpreted as invalidate man-woman marriage."


15 posted on 11/03/2005 10:40:39 AM PST by hocndoc ( http://www.lifeethics.org Vote For Proposition 2 Nov 8 Defend law, not just marriage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs

Fudge packers and kitty lickers, get out and vote.


16 posted on 11/03/2005 10:43:45 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs

This story is a perfect case in point of selective media use of polls. I'm willing to bet that poll numbers show this proposal passing with big numbers, yet no polls are cited in this story so that the impression can be conveyed, however briefly, that there is a question re. whether it will pass.

All total b.s. to give the lib argument a chance to have some media play.

This is where bias comes in. The filters are applied differently for individual stories.

If the liberal side was winning substantively in this kind of a contest, this story would not be written for the "underdog" conservatives.

Steaming pile of crap journalism 101.


17 posted on 11/03/2005 10:44:14 AM PST by BigTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs
[The calls] tell people that the language is sloppy and ask them not to risk a judge using those words to ban marriage as we know it. -Glen Maxey, an openly gay former legislator directing the opposition group No Nonsense

Unbelievable. I say they are using the fact of out-of-control judges to oppose this legislation that is intended, in part, to counteract out-of-control judges.

Here's what I mean. Any judge that would parse the words in a weird way counter to their intent, such as the absurdity that they mean marriage in general is banned, is the opposite of an originalist. So, Glen Maxey, your argument only serves to steel our resolve to promote originalism even more.

24 posted on 11/03/2005 11:24:27 AM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs

later pingout.


26 posted on 11/03/2005 11:40:24 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs

How do you "gear up" to vote.


28 posted on 11/03/2005 12:07:18 PM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs; EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Texans - vote early and often! I hope it passes by a landslide. And let us know about any (more) dirty tricks.

Freepmail me and DirtyHarryY2K if you want on/off this pinglist.


42 posted on 11/03/2005 11:03:37 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs

Don't Mess With Texas!


50 posted on 11/04/2005 10:35:47 PM PST by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs

Yes, but I've heard the Dems in Houston have signed up all the NO 'Rats to vote against this ban on homo marriage. They aren't residents of Texas, but hey, neither are all the Mexican citizens who vote in Texas border counties and San Antonio.


52 posted on 11/05/2005 5:54:02 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs

So the ONLY article to appear is a homo-centri one.

This is the SAME LIE that shepard smith reported when he LIED and said that DOMAs would harm "live together" heterosexuals.

Someone should just take a video camera to the local office depot and show a picture of the 24.95 cohabitation agreement that has always been available to homosexuals.

Such tactics by the homosexuals are sub-human.


55 posted on 11/05/2005 7:44:56 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs

Voted for Prop. 2 over a week ago... expect it to pass easily.


56 posted on 11/05/2005 7:49:25 AM PST by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs

If TX goes fruity, the end could be nearer than we suppose.


66 posted on 11/05/2005 8:28:32 PM PST by Whitewasher (Would u like America to be a goat nation in the millennium to come? Keep pushing the "Roadmap" bull!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson