Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Political darts now, boomerang later?
Newsday ^ | October 31. 2005 | James P. Pinkerton

Posted on 10/31/2005 7:55:45 PM PST by Map Kernow

On Friday, many Democrats and reporters were disappointed that Karl Rove was not indicted. But they shouldn't worry too much, because the indictment of Lewis "Scooter" Libby will make for good partisan blood sport - although in years to come, Libby's case might yet offer cheer to Republicans.

....[R]eacting quickly to the news, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York flailed at Libby, declaring the alleged actions of Vice President Dick Cheney's now-former chief of staff to be "reprehensible."

Clinton must be careful, however, because Libby's past legal career is closely intertwined with her husband's presidency. During the 1980s and 1990s, Libby was a lawyer for Marc Rich.

And if you don't remember Marc Rich, you will be reminded of him soon enough. ...... As Rich's lawyer over the next two decades, Libby collected, by his own estimate, some $2 million in fees.

Wait, there's more. In January 2001, outgoing President Bill Clinton gave Rich a pardon. Interestingly, Rich's ex-wife, Denise, donated more than a million dollars to Democratic causes around then, including $70,000 to Hillary Clinton's 2000 Senate campaign and $450,000 to the Clinton Foundation.

Libby denied having anything to do with the pardon effort, but admitted he had called Rich on January 22, 2001 - which is to say, after he started working for Cheney - to congratulate him on his getting off. And Libby's powerful presence inside the White House - his title was assistant to George W. Bush as well chief of staff to Cheney - might help explain why the incoming Bush administration failed to pursue obvious threads of corruption trailing out of President Clinton's pardon of Rich and other dubious figures.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: libby; rich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Remember Clintigula's eleventh-hour pardon of Marc Rich? Some of us wondered why GW didn't seem that interested in finding out what was behind it.
1 posted on 10/31/2005 7:55:46 PM PST by Map Kernow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Map Kernow

bookmark for later


3 posted on 10/31/2005 7:59:15 PM PST by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow
Rich shows no signs of behaving better. Still wheeling and dealing out of Switzerland, he is a featured nogoodnik in the new UN report on Saddam Hussein and the UN's corrupt Oil for Food program. Which is to say, investigators might wish to look into any continuing Libby-Rich links.

Let alone look for Clinton - Rich(- UN $$) links we've not yet found.

4 posted on 10/31/2005 8:01:23 PM PST by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chevy Sales

Marc Rich is involved in the Iraq "oil-for-food" scandal too---corruptly of course.


5 posted on 10/31/2005 8:02:00 PM PST by Map Kernow ("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow
--So Libby's case provides a lesson in how Washington works. To use his image, when people are so connected in sneaky ways, if one "tree" starts to turn, an entire cluster might fall--

--reminiscent of the George Steponallofus' remark about the "Doomsday" machine--

6 posted on 10/31/2005 8:02:18 PM PST by rellimpank (urbanites don' t understand the cultural deprivation of not being raised on a farm:NRABenefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Libby's "aspens" letter to Miller was definitely a coded message.


7 posted on 10/31/2005 8:03:26 PM PST by Map Kernow ("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow
How do we know that this isn't the boomerang, and not the dart?

-PJ

8 posted on 10/31/2005 8:04:35 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Maybe Marc Rich doesn't limit his "contributions" to Democrats. He doesn't strike me as a man of rigorous ideological purity.


9 posted on 10/31/2005 8:07:57 PM PST by Map Kernow ("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow

Now THIS is worth watching...

I can't wait to see what happens when the breadcrumbs lead to the Clintons.

BUAHAHAHAHAHA!


10 posted on 10/31/2005 8:11:22 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Let's tear down the observatory so we never get hit by a meteor again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: theOffice

bttt


12 posted on 10/31/2005 8:23:51 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow
A President's right to issue pardons is absolute.

What purpose would there be to investigate the pardon of Rich beyond what was already done.

13 posted on 10/31/2005 8:25:41 PM PST by OldFriend (Fitzgerald is a Lawrence Walsh wannabe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow

Better for the adored wife of Bill Clinton to get Scooter out of the way before she gets annointed to the office of the presidency, by finding a means to damage his reputation, just in case he feels compelled to speak about those glamourous days defending impeached Clinton crony and big big time donor, crook Marc Rich.


14 posted on 10/31/2005 8:33:07 PM PST by harpo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
A President's right to issue pardons is absolute.

"Absolute" in the sense that a President can bestow them corruptly, for material gain? I don't think so. Especially since Rich continues his corrupt activity in violation of US law.

What purpose would there be to investigate the pardon of Rich beyond what was already done.

You're right. It might break up a beautiful friendship.

15 posted on 10/31/2005 8:33:20 PM PST by Map Kernow ("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: harpo11
Better for the adored wife of Bill Clinton to get Scooter out of the way before she gets annointed to the office of the presidency, by finding a means to damage his reputation, just in case he feels compelled to speak about those glamourous days defending impeached Clinton crony and big big time donor, crook Marc Rich.

I hope she doesn't feel she can speak with impunity---without the story of her and her husband's probably corrupt dealings with Rich coming out. Pinkerton implies that she believes she can, perhaps because GW doesn't want the story behind the Rich pardon to come out either.

16 posted on 10/31/2005 8:38:49 PM PST by Map Kernow ("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow
Guess we know now, don't we?

I think this is one of my favorite paragraphs in this article:

Now suppose Giuliani ends up with the Republican presidential nomination, squaring off against Hillary Rodham Clinton. In their nationally televised debate, Libby would be a mere footnote. But Rich would be an important topic, since neither Bill nor Hillary has ever fully explained his pardon.

Favorite because in the previous paragraph it spells out that it was Rudi who prosecuted Rich in the first place.

17 posted on 10/31/2005 8:41:17 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow

I agree... and I also believe there was more than professionalism to their relationship.. too many clandistine meetings.


18 posted on 10/31/2005 8:42:15 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: harpo11
In a February 2001 NY Times op-ed, Clinton claimed the Marc Rich pardon had been vetted by Scooter Libby:

"...the case for the pardons was reviewed and advocated not only by my former White House counsel Jack Quinn but also by three distinguished Republican attorneys: Leonard Garment, a former Nixon White House official; William Bradford Reynolds, a former high-ranking official in the Reagan Justice Department; and Lewis Libby, now Vice President Cheney's chief of staff..."

"Lewis Libby" obviously refers to "Scooter" Libby, indicted last Friday.

19 posted on 10/31/2005 9:09:33 PM PST by Map Kernow ("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Here's a passage from Byron York's March 2001 NRO article Bad Night for the GOP: Lewis Libby comes to Marc Rich’s defense.:

In a particularly damaging exchange with Pennsylvania Democrat Paul Kanjorski , Libby agreed that Rich might be characterized as a traitor for fleeing the country and renouncing his American citizenship. Kanjorski asked Libby why he would call a traitor to congratulate him on his good fortune in winning a pardon. Visibly uncomfortable, Libby had no answer.

For Republicans, Libby's testimony was a sour endnote to what had been a long day of revelations that made President Clinton's decision to pardon Rich seem even more inexplicable than previously thought.

The Bush Administration has refused to allow public access to records on Clinton's pardons. I think more than simply "professional courtesy" is behind the refusal.

20 posted on 10/31/2005 9:21:29 PM PST by Map Kernow ("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson