Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No More Stealth Picks (Stealth Nominees "Do Injustice to the Conservative Cause." PREACH It, Mona!)
TownHall.com ^ | 10/28/2005 | Mona Charen

Posted on 10/28/2005 1:31:13 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Earthdweller
Tell us who is going to get past the filibuster?

I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...

41 posted on 10/28/2005 4:23:52 AM PDT by gridlock (Nature started the fight for survival, and now she wants to quit because she's losing... Monty Burns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
The pundits who stooped to the level of Far Left tactics in the past few weeks did not do honor to conservatism. Ends do not justify means, and their previous claims that the President's nominee "deserved" the right to a vote will come back to haunt them.

However, the Republican Senators are now placed in a position of deciding whether they will defend the principles of the Founders' Constitution and back a strong conservative nominee, or whether they will be cowered by the threats of Durbin, Reid, et al.

The Far Left adheres to the "living constitution" school, meaning that, as one liberal university professor proudly boasted a few years ago, "what we have had is a 'sitting constitutional convention.'"

There is no middle ground between liberty and tyranny, and that is what this is about.

Of the Constitution, James Madison observed that, ". . . every word. . . decides a question between power and liberty. . . ."

If future generations are to enjoy the liberty previous generations considered their birthright, and for which so many have sacrificed their lives, then now is the time for naming Supreme Court justices who will limit the Court to interpreting the Constitution. If changes are to be made, the Constitution has prescribed the only legitimate method by which they may be made--by act of "the People" themselves through the Amendment Process.

42 posted on 10/28/2005 4:46:46 AM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

>>>Can't you vultures even let the ink dry on the Miers withdrawal before you promote your "perfect" pick?<<<

Ink dries pretty fast. What't the point of your snippiness?


43 posted on 10/28/2005 4:47:38 AM PDT by PhilipFreneau ("The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God." -- Psalms 14:1, 53:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

This is insane. Some of you would rather put up an unknown quantity (Miers) with no qualifications whatsoever and with highly questionable views who "can be confirmed" as opposed to fighting for true conservatives? What the heck is wrong with you people? No stomach for the fight to do what is right?


44 posted on 10/28/2005 5:04:48 AM PDT by Romish_Papist (Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat

I think it has something to do with electronics.


45 posted on 10/28/2005 5:40:07 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Neither the depth of despondency nor the height of euphoria tells you how long either will last. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I hope the Uber-Cons know of a way to get the spineless Senators to support an open Conservative candidate. If a JRB is nominated and rejected by the Senate the Uber-Cons will really have egg on their face.
46 posted on 10/28/2005 6:29:07 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
If we had a leadership with guts

If.

47 posted on 10/28/2005 7:00:01 AM PDT by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
I hope the Uber-Cons know of a way to get the spineless Senators to support an open Conservative candidate. If a JRB is nominated and rejected by the Senate the Uber-Cons will really have egg on their face.

The spineless Senators are a disservice to the conservative cause, and can only be exposed by forcing them to take a position.

The conservative-liberal war will not be won in a single battle, but conservatives WILL lose the war if they avoid the battles.

I think the GOP has egg on its face now, for adopting a go-along/get-along approach with its sworn enemies in the DEM/liberal movement.

48 posted on 10/28/2005 7:04:47 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

AMEN!


49 posted on 10/28/2005 6:51:10 PM PDT by meema (I am a Conservative Traditional Republican, NOT an elitist, sexist , cynic or right wing extremist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; WhistlingPastTheGraveyard; Reagan Man; just mimi; kesg; SpiderMBA; ...

Mona Charen ping!


50 posted on 10/28/2005 10:06:39 PM PDT by cgk (Delay/Weldon '08: That's the ticket! // QUAGMIERS: Punidtry's present, predictable predicament.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Gosh Mike, your equating us with Nazis is so original. And we have hardly called you people Bushbots, lemmings, or Rino's all day today.

You lost this battle. Why you (and the prez) wanted a liberal but female version of Souter still mystifies a lot of us.

So let's get ready to support a good, solid conservative for the next one, unless you want a moderate of course. I think the president will get the next one right.


51 posted on 10/28/2005 10:17:00 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat
I read that stuff, and I saw it as referring to federalism which is indeed a conservative principle, or at least it once was.

I read the stuff too, and it gave me a headache just trying to discern a coherent thought in it.

In comparison, her withdrawal letter is well written. If she wrote it, I suspect she allowed it to be heavily edited.

52 posted on 10/28/2005 10:18:27 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Luke21
Gosh Mike, your equating us with Nazis is so original.

I called no one a Nazi nor equated anyone with being a Nazi, retract that or be known for what you are, a mewling piece of crap. That is not a joke moron.

53 posted on 10/28/2005 10:35:53 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: cgk
>>>>A strong originalist like Alito, Luttig or McConnell will do you proud, unite the conservative movement behind you, and chisel a key triumph in your legacy.

From the beginning, even before John Roberts, Michael Luttig was the best choice. He remains the best choice.

54 posted on 10/28/2005 10:37:40 PM PDT by Reagan Man (Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
What would you like people to do - observe a week-long period of mourning during which we sit around somberly reading and reflecting on the wit and wisdom of Harriet Miers as passed down in her speeches, such as this kernel?:

"Courage is lacking in would-be leaders many times today."


55 posted on 10/28/2005 11:14:04 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Even as we speak, I am printing off Harriet's epistle, and will read and reflect on it throughout the day.

Lucky for you, we roll back the clock one hour this weekend. :)

56 posted on 10/28/2005 11:19:07 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll
Pulleeeezzzeee!

Nothing could be further from the truth...

57 posted on 10/28/2005 11:20:50 PM PDT by carton253 (Never take counsel of your fears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Fool me once shame on you fool me twice shame on... I won't be fooled again.


58 posted on 10/28/2005 11:23:26 PM PDT by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luke21
Here's the point Luke21 that you all seem to be missing...

You don't know if she was the liberal but female version of Souter. You don't know anything about her because she had not had a hearing. If you had not insisted on your own narrow minded way and waited until the hearing, you might have discovered that she was Scalia in a skirt.

But no! You were too busy pounding your chest with outraged conservative indignation and declaring that you've been betrayed.

How melodramatic and childish!

How silly and destructive!

59 posted on 10/28/2005 11:25:34 PM PDT by carton253 (Never take counsel of your fears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

I love the mind of Mona Charen. I wish she still did TV. Brava!


60 posted on 10/28/2005 11:26:30 PM PDT by Petronski (Cyborg is the greatest blessing I have ever known.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson