Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Critics and a Senator Raise Ante for Miers (Concerned Women for America gives a thumbs down)
Los Angeles Times ^ | 10/27/2005 | Maura Reynolds

Posted on 10/27/2005 12:36:17 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

WASHINGTON — In new signs of eroding support for Harriet E. Miers, the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman sent her a sharply worded list of questions Wednesday on constitutional law, and one of the nation's leading grass-roots evangelical organizations called for the withdrawal of her Supreme Court nomination.

Concerned Women for America, one of the nation's largest Christian advocacy groups, changed its "wait-and-see" position after reading speeches she gave in the early 1990s in which she supported, among other things, "the freedom of the individual woman's right to decide for herself whether she will have an abortion."

The speeches "indicate a radical feminist worldview, a penchant for judicial activism, race and sex quotas, a liberal characterization of the abortion debate and government spending, and an inability to articulate her positions clearly," the group said in a statement.

"We do not think there is anything she could say at her hearing that would satisfy our concerns," Jan LaRue, chief counsel of Concerned Women for America, said in an interview.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; conservativebase; cwa; harrietmiers; miers; scotus; supremecourt

1 posted on 10/27/2005 12:36:18 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
"[Miers' views]indicate a radical feminist worldview, a penchant for judicial activism, race and sex quotas, a liberal characterization of the abortion debate and government spending, and an inability to articulate her positions clearly"...

Granted she could have changed her views in the last 12 years. But even if we give her the benefit of the doubt, the fact remains she's not qualified to sit on the Supreme Court. Someone who can't articulate their positions clearly are not up to task of facing down judicial activism in our courts. That's all the reason we need to demand this nomination be withdrawn.

("Denny Crane: Gun Control? For Communists. She's a liberal. Can't hunt.")

2 posted on 10/27/2005 12:43:13 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; NapkinUser; Conservative Coulter Fan; Sam the Sham; Soul Seeker; ...

Ping list overload...


3 posted on 10/27/2005 12:52:51 AM PDT by flashbunny (What is more important: Loyalty to principles, or loyalty to personalities?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
This nomination should have been pulled weeks ago.

The pig headed approach of those who want to rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic is pathetic.

4 posted on 10/27/2005 3:12:43 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

Good job fb for all you did to support a true Conservative nominee for the SCOTUS.


5 posted on 10/27/2005 2:33:48 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; NapkinUser; Conservative Coulter Fan; Sam the Sham; Soul Seeker

And you guys too.


6 posted on 10/27/2005 2:36:21 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson