Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutor Meets With Chief Judge Could Signal That Fitzgerald Is Seeking Extension
New York Sun ^ | 10-26-05 | JOSH GERSTEIN

Posted on 10/26/2005 12:10:24 PM PDT by inpajamas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161 next last
To: lugsoul
That's a pretty bold statement for something based entirely upon speculation. What is your interest in never knowing what the facts are?

Come on. He's had two years to gather this information and now, at the 11th hour, he may want to extend the Grand Jury?

He's got nothing except some manufactured charges with no underlying crime.

Fitz is trying to justify all the money he's poured down this rat hole.

61 posted on 10/26/2005 12:30:29 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

Sounds like the usual MSM b.s.

Fitzgerald could just as easily be meeting with the judge for a final review before shutting down the whole thing, or to talk about handling indictments, or to ask for an extension, or to say "what a pant-load the MSM has been on this case, do you think we should shut it down now and drive the MSM crazy, or keep it going another year and give them more chances to fabricate stories?"

I've seen lots of attempted spin in the past week, but nothing of real facts that indicate anything about what is going to happen next.


62 posted on 10/26/2005 12:30:36 PM PDT by Enchante (Joe Wilson: "Don't indict me, I'm just the depraved liar that started this thing.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LS

LOL!


63 posted on 10/26/2005 12:30:55 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: inpajamas

The fact that the prosecutorial staff stayed in the Grand Jury room for an hour after the GJ adjourned suggests a "What do we do next?" conference. The "what we do next" was apparently talk to the Chief Judge. The "what happens next?" - who knows?


64 posted on 10/26/2005 12:30:55 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

I guess the press never thought about that, Hell two co-workers, getting together around 12:00 and meeting for an hour, they must be up to something.....


65 posted on 10/26/2005 12:31:34 PM PDT by vin-one (REMEMBER the WTC !!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth

That is a crackerjack premise! Vince Flynn, look out!


66 posted on 10/26/2005 12:32:01 PM PDT by RexBeach ("The rest of the world is three drinks behind." -Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Exactly. Taking this one more step, it would seem that the Rove/Libby avenue would be relatively short but the Wilson/CIA avenue would require a new grand jury that would use the the first grand jury's indictments as leverage.


67 posted on 10/26/2005 12:32:16 PM PDT by mpreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
The conversation was probably more like:

Are you totally satisfied with your report? "Yes".

Do you feel that an extension is necessary for whatever reason?

"No".

Then have one on me!!

68 posted on 10/26/2005 12:33:02 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
That whopping $700k? Sure.

Are you on the payroll now?

I'll touch base with you on your comments here tomorrow. Seems odd that you'd go that far out on a limb based on a presumption that you don't know is true.

Have you considered that the meeting had nothing to do with extending the GJ?

69 posted on 10/26/2005 12:33:43 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD
Maybe brownbagging their lunches and having a good laugh at the press outside ?

That would be my first guess.

70 posted on 10/26/2005 12:34:30 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Bingo, and his leaking buds in the MSM could give him even more glowing coverage if he extends.

Great deal!


71 posted on 10/26/2005 12:34:35 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: mpreston
Why? Because the investigation is moving on the the real meat - Miller, Plame, Wilson and the CIA. THAT will take time.

That makes more sense than anything else at this point. I guess we'll have to wait until the leak investigators leak more information to us.

72 posted on 10/26/2005 12:34:52 PM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: inpajamas
Whether a request for an extension is a bad or good thing, I cannot say. But it sure would show the MSM's feeding frenzy about imminent indictments is way off the mark.
73 posted on 10/26/2005 12:35:15 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inpajamas

Chief Judge Hogan is a Reagan appointee and is a smart, fair, tough, no-nonsense judge. If Fitzgerald is grandstanding or playing games, he will not find Tom Hogan very receptive.


74 posted on 10/26/2005 12:35:40 PM PDT by blau993 (Labs for love; .357 for Security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

Valerie worked for a large organization for MANY years. To say that no one knew about her working at the CIA is absurd.


75 posted on 10/26/2005 12:37:01 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: inpajamas

with the expansion of the investigation to include the forged documents, I can see an extension making sense...


76 posted on 10/26/2005 12:37:21 PM PDT by Homer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Homer1

It's beginning to sound like "Don't kill the job!"


77 posted on 10/26/2005 12:38:45 PM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
It is possible that Mr. Fitzgerald's visit was to discuss how court personnel would cope with the indictment and arraignment of high-profile White House officials.

Ex parte meetings with the judge for other than procedural matters would not be allowed. I don't think Fitzgerald CAN run indictments by the judge.

78 posted on 10/26/2005 12:39:24 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

I wish we had the video of Andrea Mitchell VERY early in this whole thing. She was on Hardball and told Chris: "Yes, I knew she was CIA. It was well known in certain circles".

I still think Andrea was Russert's source.


79 posted on 10/26/2005 12:39:29 PM PDT by Timeout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

"Whether a request for an extension is a bad or good thing, I cannot say. But it sure would show the MSM's feeding frenzy about imminent indictments is way off the mark."

I think this is the best assessment yet.


80 posted on 10/26/2005 12:39:35 PM PDT by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson