Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sick - A Florida paraplegic needs relief.
National Review Online ^ | October 24, 2005, 8:37 a.m. | Radley Balko

Posted on 10/25/2005 2:51:56 AM PDT by JTN

Today, Richard Paey sits in a wheelchair behind high walls and razor wire in a high-security prison near Daytona Beach. Paey is a 46-year-old father of three, and a paraplegic. His condition is the result of a car accident, a botched back surgery, and a case of multiple sclerosis — three setbacks that have left him in a chronic, debilitating state of pain. After moving to Florida from New Jersey, Paey found it increasingly difficult to get prescriptions for the pain medication he needed to function normally — to support his family, and to be a parent to his children.

Paey's difficulties finding treatment were in large part due to federal- and state-government efforts to prevent the illegal use — or "diversion," as the feds call it — of prescription pain medicine. Doctors today face fines ,suspension, the loss of license or practice, the seizure of property, or even prison time in the event that drug cops (most of whom have no medical training) decide they are prescribing too many painkillers. As a result, physicians are understandably apprehensive about aggressively treating pain.

Like many pain patients, Paey found himself on the blunt end of such policies. He went from doctor to doctor, looking for someone to give him the medication he needed. By the time he eventually turned to his old New Jersey doctor for help, he had already attracted the attention of Florida drug-control authorities. What happened next is disputed, but it ended with Paey getting arrested, getting his home raided, and eventually getting convicted of drug distribution.

Paey insists his old doctor wrote him the prescriptions he needed. The Florida pharmacists who testified at his trial back him up. But the doctor says he forged the prescriptions. For his part, Paey holds no animus against his former doctor. Cops gave the doctor a devil's bargain — give Paey up, or face 25-years-to-life imprisonment for the excessive proscribing of painkillers. Paey still maintains the prescriptions were legitimate, but understands why his doctor turned against him.

The larger issue, of course, is why a man who is clearly not an addict (he wasn't taking the medication to get high) and had a legitimate use for the medication wasn't given access to what he needed in the first place.

State prosecutors concede there's no evidence Paey ever sold or gave his medication away. Nevertheless, under draconian drug-war statutes, these prosecutors could pursue distribution charges against him based solely on the amount of medication he possessed (the unauthorized possession of as few as 60 tablets of some pain medications can qualify a person as a "drug trafficker").

After three trials, Richard Paey was convicted and put in prison for 25 years, effectively a life sentence for someone in his condition. Ironically, the state of Florida now pays for a morphine pump connected to Paey's spine which delivers the same class of medication at the same doses the state of Florida told him wasn't necessary, and put him in prison for trying to obtain.

Prosecutors originally offered Paey a plea bargain that would have helped him avoid jail time, but Paey refused, insisting that (a) he did nothing wrong, and (b) even if he had, it shouldn't be a crime to seek relief from chronic pain. Paey feared that a plea would make other doctors in the state more reluctant to treat pain than they already were.

Publicly, Paey's prosecutors have conceded that the 25-year sentence was excessive, yet they insist that Paey himself is to blame, citing his refusal to accept a plea agreement. The chilling implication: Paey is serving prison time for drug distribution not because he's guilty of actually distributing drugs — the state admits as much — but because he insisted on exercising his constitutionally-protected right to a jury trial.

Earlier this year, New York Times columnist John Tierney flew to Florida to interview Paey for a story that ran on July 19. Tierney's column was sympathetic to Paey's plight, and sharply critical of the state of Florida.

There is now strong evidence that the state of Florida and prison officials retaliated against Paey for speaking with Tierney. Two weeks after the interview, Paey was moved to a prison facility more than two hours from his wife and family. He was then moved even farther away, some 170 miles, to the Tomoka Correctional Institution near Daytona Beach. Sympathetic prison officials, other inmates, and medical staff have since told Paey he was moved away from his family because the guard who sat in on his interview with Tierney had complained to prison authorities about what Paey had revealed to the journalist.

At about the same time, prison medical staff told Paey that the state of Florida had refused to give permission for them to refill his morphine pump. For Paey, this information was the equivalent of a death sentence. The state of Florida left him to agonize for weeks before finally authorizing the refill, the day before his pump was scheduled to run dry. Here again, Paey has since been given strong reason to believe that the threat to withhold his medication was in retaliation for relaying his story to the New York Times.

Two activist groups representing pain patients — the Pain Relief Network and the November Coalition — have begun a campaign urging Governor Jeb Bush to grant Richard Paey a pardon. Governor Bush should hear them out. Richard Paey is not a criminal. He isn't a threat to anyone. He's a tragic figure who has become a political prisoner of America's allegiance to zero-tolerance drug prohibition.

The Paey case has already cast a good deal of shame on the state of Florida. Just how much more shame his story brings to the state depends on whether political leaders move to rectify his plight, or rather choose simply to ignore him, and continue to intimidate him into spending the rest of his 25-year prison term in silence.

Governor Bush should free Richard Paey. And Florida lawmakers should pass reforms to ensure that drug-war fanaticism no longer prevents sick people from getting the medication they need.

— Radley Balko is a policy analyst at the Cato Institute.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: Florida; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: cato; courts; crime; daytona; drugs; florida; jeb; jebbush; ms; multiplesclerosis; paincontrol; paraplegic; richardpaey; sickness; wod; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: JTN

Nazis doing what Nazis do...


21 posted on 10/25/2005 7:59:44 AM PDT by Lexington Green (... and a cavity search for every schoolchild.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JTN

Meanwhile, Florida set free the trio that aided and abetted in the murder of little Jessica Lunsford. Well, prosecutors have to set priorities....


22 posted on 10/25/2005 8:38:56 AM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JTN

It's a terrible story. It's horrid to treat someone with MS like this.


23 posted on 10/25/2005 8:43:03 AM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

Paging Claire: Is it time yet?


24 posted on 10/25/2005 8:57:45 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative; freepatriot32

What a story...

ping


25 posted on 10/25/2005 10:24:26 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/secondaryproblemsofsocialism.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Amos the Prophet
"It is important for conservatives to take a long, hard look at Gov Jeb Bush. He has twice, now, failed to act to insure humane treatment for Florida citizens. This unwillingness to stand in the breach against injustice does not bode well for conservative values."

We should probably take a hard look at the state representatives in Florida and other states that pass crazy laws like these. More importantly, we should probably take a long, hard look at ourselves because we vote for these nincompoops that seem hell bent on turning our country into a police state reminiscent of the former Soviet Union, complete with draconian laws enforced in large part by secret police, producing the highest incarceration rate in the world. Governors don't make the laws and they don't use their veto power much to stop laws from being passed because the legislators are supposed to represent the will of the people in their districts. No doubt there was tremendous support for these tough new anti-drugs measures requiring a 25 year mandatory minimum from which judges had no discretion to deviate. Maybe we should pay attention to what our legislators do and not be so quick to fall for tough on drugs rhetoric without thinking of the negative consequences of the laws and policies being considered.

I believe there are websites where people can find out which legislator or legislators introduced the bill behind these laws and who voted for them. For my state and probably yours we can look up who is on what committee and find out what type of legislation our representatives are voting for. I always make a note of who is introducing mostly pork legislation and who is introducing stupid laws and who brings smart legislation to the table. You can let your elected representative know what you think about the legislation he's putting through or supporting. If you don't like the laws he gets behind you can tell him exactly why and tell him that because of it you intend to vote for whoever runs against him and bring as many other voters along with you that you can. He probably won't listen unless he hears enough of that sort of thing from people, but you can always work to get him replaced and if enough people work together you might succeed or at least give him reason to think twice next time he considers the type of legislation a large portion of his electorate oppose.
26 posted on 10/25/2005 10:40:43 AM PDT by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JTN

Disgusting. Zero tolerance = zero intelligence.


27 posted on 10/25/2005 11:10:54 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! --kellynla)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JTN; albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Americanwolf; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; ..
Libertarian ping!To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
28 posted on 10/25/2005 6:51:39 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/foundingoftheunitedstates.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Thanks for the ping. I'm not sure whether to be incensed or depressed after reading this article.

I'd sure like to know what the supporters of the War on Drugs have to say about this.


29 posted on 10/25/2005 9:10:43 PM PDT by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Thanks for the ping. What a sickening tragedy. This story should be spread far and wide.

Why hasn't Gov. Bush issued a pardon? A quick search on Yahoo did not reveal a response from the governor.


30 posted on 10/26/2005 7:40:05 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Add me.


31 posted on 10/26/2005 2:31:36 PM PDT by JTN ("We must win the War on Drugs by 2003." - Dennis Hastert, Feb. 25 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
How sad!

Florida should go after illegal aliens.

32 posted on 10/26/2005 2:35:02 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Totalitarian socialism - American style! The pious liars and smug thugs who support these evil anti-drug laws should be put down like diseased animals.

I get interested in these stories until I get to the excess drama.

33 posted on 10/30/2005 10:02:09 AM PST by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
That was a tad over the top. ;^)
34 posted on 10/30/2005 10:16:06 AM PST by headsonpikes (The Liberal Party of Canada are not b*stards - b*stards have mothers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
People who pass and enforce such mornic laws should spend a few months in terrible chronic pain as an educational experience.

I agree. I normally don't wish harm on people, but I make an exception for the Drug Warriors. They are some of the most heartless and evil scum walking free in this country today. Suffer, bastards, I hope you suffer pain like the hammers of Hell someday!

-ccm

35 posted on 10/30/2005 5:51:42 PM PST by ccmay (Beware the fury of a patient man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
I get interested in these stories until I get to the excess drama.

You'll find it pretty dramatic someday when you are bedridden with pain, and no doctor will prescribe you effective pain relief because of the lunatic anti-drug policies you routinely support here.

-ccm

36 posted on 10/30/2005 5:56:05 PM PST by ccmay (Beware the fury of a patient man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
The drama I'm referring to can be found on every drug thread here. Even the person I replied to admitted he was a bit over the top.

Check out this page http://www.november.org/cartoons/. Paey seems to be his own worst enemy, a possible attention whore, and wannabe drug martyr. Until you guys tone down the rhetoric, and seriously consider both sides of the issue, you aren't doing anybody any good.

37 posted on 10/30/2005 6:54:40 PM PST by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62; ccmay
Totalitarian socialism - American style! The pious liars and smug thugs who support these evil anti-drug laws should be put down like diseased animals.

*************************************************

Even the person I replied to admitted he was a bit over the top.

Absolutely 'over the top' - there should be trials first!

38 posted on 10/31/2005 4:53:52 AM PST by headsonpikes (The Liberal Party of Canada are not b*stards - b*stards have mothers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: JTN; jmc813

Thanks for the ping.

jmc, how have you been?


39 posted on 11/04/2005 8:32:51 AM PST by Cathryn Crawford (¿Podemos ahora sonreír?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
jmc, how have you been?

Hi Cathryn! I've been great! Moved two months ago, so things have been a bit hectic, and freeping has been a bit limited. Nice to see you around and I trust all is well. Are you still publishing columns?

40 posted on 11/04/2005 8:42:43 AM PST by jmc813 (Don't Lick Toad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson