Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Wants a High Court Justice Who Won't 'Go Souter'
Legal Times ^ | 10/24/5 | T.R. Goldman

Posted on 10/23/2005 11:24:56 AM PDT by Crackingham

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

1 posted on 10/23/2005 11:24:57 AM PDT by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591; Pharmboy; Das Outsider; meema; Texas Federalist; Rodney King; ARealMothersSonForever; ..

Instead, he put up "go along to get along miers".


2 posted on 10/23/2005 11:26:40 AM PDT by flashbunny (What is more important: Loyalty to principles, or loyalty to personalities?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

She may not "go Souter", but we don't want her to "go O'Connor" either.


3 posted on 10/23/2005 11:32:16 AM PDT by Texas Federalist (qualified to serve on the United States Supreme Court)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

I think he put her up because he knows (or at least firmly believes) that she is conservative and she is tough as nails and will get through the confirmation process, which has been made into an occasion of torture by the Dems. She was supposedly known as the "Iron Lady" at some point in her legal career, so she may be better qualified than we think. How wonderful would it be to see Ted Kennedy made a fool of twice in a row...(remember Roberts?)


4 posted on 10/23/2005 11:33:17 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Fine. Then withdraw Meiers and appoint Brown.

L

5 posted on 10/23/2005 11:36:15 AM PDT by Lurker (Leave the gun, but take the canolli.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

So, Rudman and Sununu want us to think that they knowingly foisted Souter on us, as opposed to their having been decieved and/or incorrect. Fine with me. May they rot in hell.


6 posted on 10/23/2005 11:37:55 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Miers is not going to 'go Souter' on him...

Maybe not intentionally, but being underqualified, she is subject to intimidation and suasion by the lefties on the court.

7 posted on 10/23/2005 11:38:50 AM PDT by Petronski (The name "cyborg" to me means complete love and incredible fun. I'm filled with joy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

Bush is fooling himself if he thinks he knows the real Harriet Miers.
After all, who doesn't tell their boss what he wants to hear?


8 posted on 10/23/2005 11:44:29 AM PDT by counterpunch (SCOTUS interruptus - withdraw Miers now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
"There is no question in my mind that [then-White House Counsel] C. Boyden Gray and [then-White House Associate Counsel] Lee Otis, both of them die-hard conservatives, vetted Souter's credentials," Sununu says. "All the questions were asked of Souter relative to the interpretation of the Constitution. They probed around specific issues as much as was perceived to be good custom. And every answer was indicative of what the president wanted. Everybody is disappointed, and with all due respect to those who were not, they were part of the deception."

The answer is obvious.

Souter deceived them in able to get nominated and confirmed so he could advance the agenda.

Just ask his wife ...

9 posted on 10/23/2005 11:49:12 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (I support the President you are betraying. You hate Bush more than you love America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
Just ask his wife ...

I thought Souter played the 'wife' role. Pillow biter.

10 posted on 10/23/2005 12:02:59 PM PDT by peyton randolph (Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
"After all, who doesn't tell their boss what he wants to hear?"

If an employee, in a position of great trust, tells his/her "boss what he wants to hear," then that employee is doing a great disservice to the employer, and if it goes on, undetected, for more than a few weeks, there's something seriously wrong with the "boss."

11 posted on 10/23/2005 12:06:56 PM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

exactly...who would want to upset the most brilliant man they've ever known, and the bestest governor ever?


12 posted on 10/23/2005 12:17:43 PM PDT by flashbunny (What is more important: Loyalty to principles, or loyalty to personalities?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: loveliberty2

This is actually one of the concerns about appointing staff to an appointment like this. If future Presidential staff have higher aspirations, will they couch their true beliefs to maintain qualification? Does this serve to strengthen or dilute the advice future Presidents recieve?


13 posted on 10/23/2005 12:18:26 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
"Just because you know her heart doesn't tell you her judicial philosophy."

Gary Bauers is exactly right.

14 posted on 10/23/2005 12:28:49 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

So as to avoid being "Soutered," the President nominates someone with even less of a papertrail. Makes sense to me. /sarcasm


15 posted on 10/23/2005 12:31:11 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
[Miers is]... underqualified....subject to intimidation and suasion...

Don't cave in to the pile-on by the Magnificent Seven ( frummie, annie, lucienne's boy, etc)? Guess we'll all just have to wait and see.
16 posted on 10/23/2005 12:32:47 PM PDT by caveat emptor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
"After all, who doesn't tell their boss what he wants to hear?"

Something Miers was particularly adept at.

17 posted on 10/23/2005 12:33:07 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny; counterpunch
My last boss (of over 10 years) thougtht she knew every thought of mine, too. We got along fine, and knew each other well enough to complete each other's sentences, but there were some things I believed that she never knew. It was a neccessity, to protect myself.
Employee/employer relationships are not equal partners.

...who would want to upset the most brilliant man they've ever known...

especially if you were happy to be working for him?

18 posted on 10/23/2005 12:43:01 PM PDT by meema (I am a Conservative Traditional Republican, NOT an elitist, sexist , cynic or right wing extremist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591
The dummies seem to be concerned about Miers...


19 posted on 10/23/2005 12:43:04 PM PDT by Earthdweller (If Miers turns out to be the anti-Roe vote that could have been..Blame the NRO!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Then withdraw Meiers and appoint Brown.

J.R. Brown does NOT want to be nominated. She asked the WH to remove her name - This has been reported by several "sources" on various radio and TV shows -

20 posted on 10/23/2005 12:51:21 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson