This columnist needs a concealed brain permit.
Sheesh, get ahold of yourself man - that's embarassing.
Can someone please give this guy a swift kick in the butt?
If you insist on carrying a gun to work and the employer says no, you need to find another job where you can carry a gun to work. Employers have rights too.
The 2nd amendment was meant to regulate the govt. not individual persons.
"This columnist needs a concealed brain permit."
They will need to see their permit to 'aquire' first!
When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.
That fool is serious. The columnist is not in need of a permit for a brain. The columnist is in need of a brain. Sheesh!
Wow.....kinda lost for words,(although my wife claims that NEVER happens.....)...
Thanks for your post CW !! Hard to believe that this guy is THAT worried about EVERY single person he sees that "Might" have a "weapon".
I hope maybe after a long day of paranoia at his puter, his husband will give him a cocktail and a "back rub in the hot tub" to soothe his nerves......
BTTT !!
Can't conceal what you don't posess.
Horrors! Horrors!
CBP! I like that.
Once again a writer fails to understand the difference between people who follow the law and criminals.
Good find.
"...there are 354,552 Floridians with concealed weapons permits walking among us."
It's a nice start.
Be afraid criminals, and tyrants, and leftist idiots, be veeeerrrryyyy afraid.
Most people who are unhinged wont have a concealed permit as they are -- UNHINDGED! This lefty loony will get on his knees and thank a God he suddenly beleives in if his coworkers saves his life by breaking out his weapon and stopping a would be mass murderer.
We wouldn't need any of these gun laws if they would simply make robbery and murder illegal.
"If there is such a thing as a retroactive, post-traumatic, primal scream/crawling into a fetal position/whimpering with delayed fear syndrome "
It is also frightening that someone who writes this type of drivel can be published! Nuts with guns and paranoid idiots with pens - neither is appealing . . . .
I knew when I read the byline and the title that this was a tripe-spewing excursion by a limp-wristed, pantywaist, weak-kneed wanna-be Eurotwit socialist...
Who only trusts the governmnt and its agents to carry guns...
But I still think a barf alert might be appended!
Thanks for posting this - it serves as a reminder that we have dedicated enemies of the Second Amendment running around out there, and they are neither afraid nor unwilling to use loaded, incendiary language and imagery to create a climate of ignorance, fear, and misunderstanding.
A.A.C.
"The Final Crusade has commenced!"
This is the email I sent to Mr. Ruth in response to his obviously biased article:
Mr. Ruth,
Your diatribe against the armed citizens of our fair State is yet another piece of drivel in the annals of the mainstream media's fearmongering literature. Your obvious discontent with the political aspects of gun ownership has clouded your ability to see the benefits to having thousands of armed citizens walking the streets around you. Frankly, I'm quite content knowing that the truck driver, lawn worker, white collar CEO, accountant, engineer (myself included), journalist, et al are armed and capable of protecting themselves in a world that increasingly grows hostile to Americans and a country that has proven more and more often that it is incapable of providing law enforcement protection to people when they need it, not 10 - 15 minutes after a phone call to 911.
I am, sir, one of these lunatics walking the street. I am driving behind and in front of people everyday with a revolver on my hip. I am protecting my home with a shotgun, an AK47 "assault weapon," and a cadre of vintage WWII weaponry that I restore and enjoy shooting and hunting with. Your ignorance for the history of firearms, their utility and their ability to level the playing field for the healthy and the not-so-healthy is tantamount to typical anti-gun scare tactics.
I assure you, Mr. Ruth, I will continue to walk the streets knowing that I am in full control of my life and my freedom with a sidearm to protect me. I am not a nutcase nor am I one of those people "most likely to snap" in my office. Every man and woman I work with knows that I own firearms, and I think it sets them at ease knowing that I would use those firearms in the lawful protection of my friends, my family and myself.
I urge you to do some research into the "gun culture" in Florida. Feel free to email me at the address provided, and I would be happy to accompany you to one of the many facilities in the Tampa Bay area and shoot some of the weapons that won wars and protected the lives of men and women in this world. Until then, please consider finding another subject into which you can instill a wreckless fear, because your commentary lacks fact, substance and overall, knowledge.
Regards, Ronald Arestia
My own 2 cents?
My wife drives a 35 or 50 mile commute to work each day-- the longer trip is on rural roads, the shorter one via the Interstate-- AKA, the "conduit for criminals"
She keeps a sidearm in the glovebox, for fast access- but there's a 12 gauge shotgun in the trunk, for those occassions when you need something better than a pistol.
The Sherrif and his deputies in the county where she works are well aware of this, and you know what? They approve- knowing if they get in a jam on the back roads, and she comes along, she's equipped to help them out.
Years ago, she worked in an office with the wife of the City's Chief of Detectives, and not only did her friend keep a pistol in her handbag ( "just in case I ever need one" ) so did every other woman in her family. Daughters, Mother, Sister- they all had a sidearm or two.
