Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judiciary going after Miers' firm's malpractice suits
Chicago Tribune ^ | Oct 21 2005 | Andrew Zajac

Posted on 10/21/2005 8:33:35 PM PDT by jeltz25

With more than 25 years of legal experience and a five-year stint on the board of a legal malpractice insurer, where her duties included helping law firms weed out bad clients, Harriet Miers was in some ways unusually well-suited to guide the fortunes of the Dallas law firm she ran in the late 1990s.

But in 2000 and 2001 her firm settled three malpractice suits of its own for at least $30 million, including one for $22 million.

Miers' tenure as the firm's managing partner was among the credentials that President Bush cited when he nominated her for the Supreme Court.

The suits have attracted the interest of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which this week asked Miers for more information about them. Committee staffers said Friday they want to know more because the settlements seemed unusually large for legal malpractice complaints.

(Excerpt) Read more at macon.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bloodinthewater; harrietmiers; miers; sc; scotus
and the hits just keep on coming
1 posted on 10/21/2005 8:33:35 PM PDT by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jeltz25

Sounds like another thing in which she was a pioneer. Sigh.


2 posted on 10/21/2005 9:02:39 PM PDT by MarcusTulliusCicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarcusTulliusCicero

I am not going to say I told you so. I am not going to say I told you so. I am not going to say I told you so.I am not going to say I told you so. I am not going to say I told you so. I am not going to say I told you so. I am not going to say I told you so. I am not going to say I told you so. I am not going to say I told you so.I am not going to say I told you so. I am not going to say I told you so. I am not going to say I told you so. . . . I TOLD YOU SO!!!!!!!! . . . sorry :)



3 posted on 10/21/2005 9:45:06 PM PDT by disraeligears (Does anybody have two extra CREAM Madison Square Garden Tickets Available?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25
From the article:

"In January 1999, Locke Purnell merged with Houston-based Liddell, Sapp, Zivley, Hill & LaBoon, and Miers was co-managing partner of the new, 400-lawyer Locke Liddell firm."

"The alleged malpractice involved three Locke Purnell attorneys and continued until Austin Forex collapsed in September 1998. At least one of those attorneys is still listed on the Locke Liddell Web site."

"(former football star Russell) Erxleben was already notorious for conning investors and business partners and that his reputation should have been a red flag for the firm."

"When the suit was filed in October 1999, Miers said the firm stood by its representation of Erxleben. "Locke Liddell has done nothing improper, and in our judgment never should have been named as a defendant," she said at the time."

"But six months later, in April 2000, Locke Liddell announced that it would pay a $22 million settlement, without admitting liability."

"Erxleben eventually was sentenced to seven years in federal prison."

4 posted on 10/21/2005 10:00:23 PM PDT by Daaave ("Iceberg right ahead.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25

If Bush was trying to avoid a controversy by nominating Miers, he failed, even if things are being exaggerated. He should have just nominated JRB and let the games begin. At least he would have had allies strongly, and forcefully, going to bat for him.

This is getting demoralizing, and this lady is being slimed.


5 posted on 10/21/2005 10:06:35 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25
On a warm summer's evenin', on a train bound for nowhere I met up with the gambler. We were both too tired to sleep. So we took turns a-starin' out the window at the darkness. When boredom overtook us, he began to speak.

He said, "Son, I've made a life out of readin' people's faces.

Knowin' what the cards were by the way they held their eyes.

So if you don't mind my sayin', I can see you're out of aces,

For a taste of your whiskey, I'll give you some advice."

So I handed him my bottle, and he drank down my last swallow.

Then he bummed a cigarette and asked me for a light. And the night got deathly quiet, and his face lost all expression.

He said, "If you're gonna play the game, boy, you gotta learn to play it right.

CHORUS: You've got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em

Know when to walk away, know when to run.

You never count your money when you're sittin' at the table.

There'll be time enough for countin' when the dealin's done.

Every gambler knows that the secret to survivin'

Is knowin' what to throw away and knowin' what to keep.

'Cause every hand's a winner and every hand's a loser

And the best that you can hope for is to die in your sleep."

CHORUS

And when he finished speakin', he turned back toward the window,

Crushed out his cigarette and faded off to sleep.

And somewhere in the darkness, the gambler he broke even.

And in his final words I found an ace that I could keep.

You've got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em

Know when to walk away, know when to run.

You never count your money when you're sittin' at the table.

There'll be time enough for countin' when the dealin's done.

6 posted on 10/21/2005 10:23:57 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25

But, but, but, how about John Edwards. His malpractice lawsuits weren't held against him. :)


7 posted on 10/21/2005 11:49:32 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

good points there

I had no problem with the pick once I learned more about her.

But, I am getting tired of trying to defend her. And her inability to understand "proportional representation" is annoying.


8 posted on 10/21/2005 11:52:50 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25
Here's one of the bad suits that the Judiciary Committee has turned up:


9 posted on 10/22/2005 5:33:39 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (read my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson