Posted on 10/21/2005 10:22:25 AM PDT by SmithL
Saint Louis-- A Missouri inmate whose effort to get an abortion went all to the way to the U.S. Supreme Court underwent the procedure.
The woman had the abortion Thursday in St. Louis, after the courts ruled that the state Corrections Department must provide her with transportation to the clinic at taxpayer expense.
. . . . Missouri law that forbids the use of tax dollars to facilitate an abortion.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
Another dead baby. There were people lined up to adopt the child.
This is a real high classed broad. In prison and murdering her baby. Yup , a real lady here allright. The word scumbag was invented for people like this.
The woman had the abortion Thursday in St. Louis, after the courts ruled that the state Corrections Department must provide her with transportation to the clinic at taxpayer expense. . . . . Missouri law that forbids the use of tax dollars to facilitate an abortion.
---- If MO forbids the use of tax dollars, why was it done? I don't understand what the law is for.
Another death sentence carried out in the United States without due process.
Sad thing is, she's a Hero to some.
What a noble achievement. She must be very proud of herself.
Poor baby....it's not your fault...
This child had no chance to live, and the one who should be the absolute protector here on earth failed to deliver that chance.
The sadness is great.
One of only 3 abortion clinics in the state shut down yesterday (Springfield). No plans to re-open it. They even dropped a law suite that challenged a NEW Missouri law that says an abortionist (read murder), must have hospital privileges within 30 miles of the abortion clinic. No hospital within 30 miles of Springfield would grant such a privilege to this murder.
We can only hope, one of the last obscene gasps of the culture of death.
Let's be honest about it. It is a significant savings for the taxpayer, if you want to leave morality out, and just look at the economics.
Not the way I see it. Mother does not want child. Mother gives child up for adoption to loving family. Loving family nutures and raises child. Loving family pays taxes and raises child to be a productive (read, tax-paying) member of society.
Really? If that child had been adopted by a solid, loving family, how much would he or she have paid out in taxes over his or her lifetime?
The original people who advocated "leaving morality out" and "just looking at the economics" were Marx, Engels, and Lenin, BTW.
Sad ping
Convicted criminals get court hearings and appeals before they are put to death.
There were people lined up to adopt the child.
Major ping!
This child had no chance to live, and the one who should be the absolute protector here on earth failed to deliver that chance.
This is delving into murky waters, but the baby may have another chance. I won't elaborate too much because it would really go beyond the subject.
if you want to leave morality out, and just look at the economics.
I can see what you mean with the birth and all, but I would rather have my tax dollars go to support that (and have the baby cared for by a caring mother and father) than an abortion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.