Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DRUDGE: NYT FRIDAY: Rove and Libby have been advised that they may be in serious legal jeopardy
Drudge ^ | 10/20/2005 | Drudge

Posted on 10/20/2005 7:18:02 PM PDT by frankjr

NYT FRIDAY: Rove and Libby have been advised that they may be in serious legal jeopardy, but only this week has Fitzgerald begun to narrow the possible charges. The prosecutor has said he will not make up his mind about any charges until next week, government officials say... Developing...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak; drudge; impeachment; joewilson; libby; pardon; pardons; plame; rove; valerieplame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 661-668 next last
To: jerry639

I'm sure we're liberals according to the stern restrictions imposed by the posters who have deemed POTUS a lib.

They're fringers. In the old days, they'd be called Birchers.


541 posted on 10/20/2005 11:16:28 PM PDT by onyx ((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies]

To: furquhart

Even if they were the sources as Cooper and Miller say Libby and Rove didn't name Plame. Unless Fitzgerald has gone way off the reservation then what is he going to charge them with? I'm supposing that they are both smart enough not to lie to a GJ, say you can't recall but don't lie. They should have learned that from the Clintons.


542 posted on 10/20/2005 11:17:48 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

We elected Reagan because he was better than Carter. It wasn't an ideology war then. It can not be compared to today's standards.


543 posted on 10/20/2005 11:51:54 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies]

To: jerry639

"Having lived 66 years, most of it under one Democrat disaster after another"

Thank you, you've never given up, even during the dire years. I'm not giving up (I'm only 45), because I see the long term goals, not tomorrow's bone.


544 posted on 10/20/2005 11:55:57 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Lawrence O'Donnell is on with Tucker Carlson saying that Karl Rove's attorney has been the one leaking all this information for the last few months.




Rove's lawyer, Robert Luskin, is a member of the Democrat law firm Patton Boggs. You have to wonder whose side he's really on in this, and why Karl picked him in the first place.


545 posted on 10/20/2005 11:57:31 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
This is an unmitigated disaster and could ultimately lead to the impeachment of President Bush.

What you hope and what is reality are two different things..

546 posted on 10/21/2005 12:02:55 AM PDT by cardinal4 (Is it Walker Elementary? No, it is Freepers arguing over the Miers nomination!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Attention: Any attorney


Why would Joe Wilson not be called before the grand jury in this mess? Could it be that he is the one going to be indicted?!

Wouldn't his testimony be valuable to the GJ if they were looking at Rove and/or Libby?!


547 posted on 10/21/2005 12:08:45 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 546 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
We elected Reagan because he was better than Carter.

B.S.

Reagan first had to win the nomination; which he won with his eloquence and flat-out conservative beliefs over the establishment choice: none other that GHW Bush. Apple, tree, and all that.

548 posted on 10/21/2005 12:12:42 AM PDT by garandgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 543 | View Replies]

To: TruthNtegrity

Bookmarking


549 posted on 10/21/2005 12:19:20 AM PDT by TruthNtegrity ("I regret that by Saturday I didn't realize that LA was dysfunctional." Michael Brown, 9/27/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
Rove and Libby have been advised that they may be in serious legal jeopardy

By whom???

550 posted on 10/21/2005 12:33:48 AM PDT by beyond the sea (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill; Howlin
Only if you don't read the law. But if you do then you realize that this is total bull shit. God, I hate the media. They are traitors and liars to a man.

God, I hate the media too.

As another poster correctly said......"who could have imagined that the White House defending itself from a blatant lie (Rove sent Wilson to Niger) could have come to this."

This is a travesty.

To me this has Hillary's fingerprints all over it. Remember when she "fudged" things when she was involved in writing up the articles of impeachment for Nixon? Can you just imagine how that empowered her when the results of her fraud worked and Nixon left office? I have read at least a dozen books on that woman, and from way back in her childhood she has felt that she is morally above all of us. She thinks any "intrigue" that she may take part in is ok, because she is morally right. This whole Wilson/Plame/Grunwald/Cooper vendetta smells quite like a black pantsuit. She is doing now what she did to Nixon.

The whole thing is a giant fraud.............. promulgated against the Bush administration by the media and the Dems.

****

The old established/liberal/socialist media is America's most ruthless, relentless, and destructive enemy.

***

Sorry, H., I felt I had to ping you because I quoted you. You are so right on this matter.

551 posted on 10/21/2005 12:48:53 AM PDT by beyond the sea (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies]

To: garandgal

BS, Reagan won because the US thought he was a better choice, period. The people didn't re-elect Carter.


552 posted on 10/21/2005 12:58:19 AM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies]

To: jerry639

Great post.


553 posted on 10/21/2005 12:58:22 AM PDT by beyond the sea (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: alcuin

"that could lead to civil war, I hate that"

I'd love it


554 posted on 10/21/2005 1:44:26 AM PDT by wildcatf4f3 (admittedly too unstable for public office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

HUH?


555 posted on 10/21/2005 2:02:14 AM PDT by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

This is such a media driven story.


556 posted on 10/21/2005 4:11:45 AM PDT by jjm2111 (99.7 FM Radio Kuwait)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

How can he be impeached? Dems don't control EITHER HOUSE......


557 posted on 10/21/2005 4:13:40 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Actually, I'm warming up to the idea of actually HAVING a trial. Let's put everybody under oath and see who lies first.

And how would we know it would be conducted fairly? Why should innocent people be put on trial?

If Fitzgerald indicts anybody other than Wilson and some media figures over this, then it's just one more sad, pathetic indication of the status of the justice system in this country.

A terrible message is being sent, especially to kids, if this happens. That you can do almost anything and get away with it....if you are Democrap.

All that said, I am fully taking into account the sources on this particular thread. The Slimes, Drudge and "anonymous".

558 posted on 10/21/2005 4:35:08 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: furquhart

If Rove and Libby are indicted, and subsequently Fitzgerald tries to pressure them to implicate Bush and/or Cheney there is one thing you can bet the farm on, Rove and Libby are loyal to the end and will never talk.


559 posted on 10/21/2005 4:40:48 AM PDT by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
one former administration official

Wonder if this means a Bush official who isn't official anymore, or a clintonista?

560 posted on 10/21/2005 4:48:47 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 661-668 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson