Posted on 10/20/2005 6:38:05 PM PDT by Plutarch
The US Senate Confirmation of Harriet Miers has been holding steady at about 65% for over a week.
One Week:
But this evening, she has dropped precipitoiusly, to less than 50%
Today:
what Al Gonzales' numbers looking like as pick #2?
Hopefully it's correct.
Time to end this farce and get rid of this abominable pick.
lol I remember watching those things like a hawk a year ago during this time.
We should be so lucky.
So where in the Constitution does it say "advise and consent" also includes the latest Vegas odds?
But I thought she was the most qualified?
What makes you think you won't get a nominee you'll hate even worse the next time?
If that claim wasn't the single biggest insult to the intelligence of the GOP base, I don't know what was.
How could he possibly say that with a straight face?
I'm tempted to try to make some money selling Libby contracts - The bid is up to $70
My only concern is it doesn't say what he would have to be indicted for... it could be something other than outing - I think he's never gonna be indicted for outing but obstruction is not impossible.
http://www.tradesports.com/aav2/trading/contractInfo.jsp?conDetailID=295602&z=1129859097453
How accurate is this a predictor when the public isn't voting? I imagine that the senate basically cares less with the people think. They will vote how they want and we are stuck.
Get rid of her. She is violating the Constitution clause requiring rejection when the nominee tanks at Tradesports.
10-16-2005
Who really is advising him?
Who really is advising him?
The mods are probably busy with the database... there have been several of these tonight. But at least they are fun.
Maybe they have a inside line. LOL
"At about 6:30 this evening, a White House source called to say that whatever strategy that was discussed in "The Miers Support Team: Gloomy and Demoralized" was the thinking of a third-party group, and not of the White House. "The White House has not discussed changing the plans," the source said. "It [the article] may represent what a third-party group thinks, but it is not representative of the mood or the strategic thinking of the White House. We were quite happy with the setting of a [hearing] date of November 7 yesterday, we feel like we're moving forward, and that's a very good thing."
Maybe we had better get over to the trading quick and get a little..hehehe.
LOL!!
How many long time FReepers agree with me, as opposed to those who agree with you?
More agree with me, bud, look at the poll.
You people have no argument, none. Pathetic.
I'm not sure how accurate these things are, one could make a case either way. Last year during the election they seemed to follow the polls and the general momentum of the race. I just think they are interesting to watch because those numbers move by people investing THEIR money like they would do in the stock market.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.