Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Defense Crumbling in Leak Case
AP ^ | 11-20-05 | PETE YOST

Posted on 10/20/2005 3:53:52 PM PDT by churchillbuff

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

1 posted on 10/20/2005 3:53:53 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: churchillbuff

* yawn *


3 posted on 10/20/2005 3:56:13 PM PDT by airborne (Al-Queda can recruit on college campuses but the US military can't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

AP=BS


4 posted on 10/20/2005 3:56:17 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

"The evidence prosecutors have assembled in the CIA leak case suggests Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff sought out reporters in the weeks before an undercover operative's identity was compromised in the news media, casting doubt on one of the White House's main lines of defense."


Even worse, he actively sought out Chinese food in the weeks before Miller ate Chinese food, a clear link.

But seriously, thats not the issue. the issue is was she outed, according to the law or was any other crime committed.


5 posted on 10/20/2005 3:57:20 PM PDT by gondramB (Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Stupid talking to any NYT reporter.


6 posted on 10/20/2005 3:57:53 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
I don't care what happens to Libby."""

Some freeper claims that Libby was the lawyer for Clinton crony Marc Rich, the rich guy who was pardoned for something or other as Clinton went out the door.

7 posted on 10/20/2005 3:57:59 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: William Creel

Since Libby was Marc Rich's attorney, I don't care what happens to him either!


8 posted on 10/20/2005 3:59:04 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: William Creel

You should. The media will be on this for 2 years if Libby is indicted and if he resigns they'll go for Cheney.


9 posted on 10/20/2005 3:59:57 PM PDT by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
I'm sure Neville, that you're just giddy after reading this article.
10 posted on 10/20/2005 4:00:50 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Cindy Sheehan, Pat Buchanan, John Conyers, and David Duke Are Just Different Sides of the Same Coin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

It was me. CNN ran a story on Libby's background and he represented Marc Rich in the Clinton pardon!!! That makes me sick.


11 posted on 10/20/2005 4:00:52 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

"I don't care what happens to Libby.""""

It's not just Libby... he is the key guy in Cheney's strategy and acts frequently on Cheney's behalf. And we know how key Rove is to the President. The administration really needs a final report with no indictments.

And I think they will get it unless somebody said something stupid that contradicted another interview.


12 posted on 10/20/2005 4:01:30 PM PDT by gondramB (Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

"In light of all the disclosures...."

Wanna investigate where all the grand jury leaks are coming from?







13 posted on 10/20/2005 4:03:23 PM PDT by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
I hope FReepers are smart enough by now to recognize blatant BS when they read it.

In a Grand Jury investigation, THERE IS NO DEFENSE. Therefore there cannot be a 'crumbling' as the article suggests. IT IS AN INVESTIGATION, NOT A TRIAL.

14 posted on 10/20/2005 4:04:18 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald, you have a very leaky boat! You best investigate that.



15 posted on 10/20/2005 4:04:48 PM PDT by BlessedByLiberty (Respectfully submitted,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
From what I understand there will be no "final report". It's not allowed without a court order that's rarely granted. So if there are no indictments and no final report, this things going to be hanging around a long time with the left claiming cover-up.
16 posted on 10/20/2005 4:05:44 PM PDT by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
Fitzgerald has no legal authorization to write a report.

There will either be indictments, or there will be nothing.

17 posted on 10/20/2005 4:05:54 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
>> Prosecutors must determine whether it was part of an effort to undermine the credibility of Plame's husband who was criticizing the White House.

It is amazing that the investigation concerns compromising the "credibility" of Plame. The total intent of the operation was to compromise the "credibility" of a sitting POTUS using a burnt out 60's radical and his connected bitch.

This story comes from spook town central, only the senate intelligence committee has a possibility of getting to the bottom of this stink hole.

Talk about a bassackwards world.
18 posted on 10/20/2005 4:06:15 PM PDT by mmercier (through the looking glass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Thank you. This is just a load.


19 posted on 10/20/2005 4:06:21 PM PDT by A.Hun (Flagellum Dei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
That's strange, didn't know the White House needed a defense.

But, now that the al-AP brings it up, what exactly is wrong with the White House refuting Wilson's lies? Odd al-AP has lost their copy of the Senate committee report issued July 7, 2004 that proved Wilson a liar.
20 posted on 10/20/2005 4:06:55 PM PDT by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson