Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Defense Crumbling in Leak Case
AP ^ | 11-20-05 | PETE YOST

Posted on 10/20/2005 3:53:52 PM PDT by churchillbuff

The evidence prosecutors have assembled in the CIA leak case suggests Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff sought out reporters in the weeks before an undercover operative's identity was compromised in the news media, casting doubt on one of the White House's main lines of defense.

For months, the White House and its supporters have argued top presidential aides did not knowingly expose Valerie Plame, the wife of administration critic Joseph Wilson, as a CIA operative.

At most, the aides passed on information about her that entered the White House from reporters, the supporters argued.

Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald now knows that Libby met three times with a New York Times reporter before the leak of Plame's identity, initiated a call to NBC's Tim Russert and was a confirming source about Wilson's wife for a Time magazine reporter.

And in a new twist, presidential political adviser Karl Rove has testified that it's possible Libby was his source before Rove talked to two reporters about the CIA operative.

In light of all the disclosures, "it's going to be as difficult for the defense to prove the theory that the White House got the information from reporters as it is for Fitzgerald to prove that the White House leaked the information about Wilson's wife," said Washington-based white-collar defense attorney James D. Wareham.

Where Libby first heard the information still isn't publicly known, but a full three weeks before Plame's name first showed up in print, Libby was telling New York Times reporter Judith Miller that he thought Wilson's wife worked for the CIA, according to Miller's testimony.

While Libby maintains that he didn't know Plame's name until it was published in the news media, the now-public evidence suggests Libby at least was aware that Wilson's wife worked at the CIA and that he spread the information.

Prosecutors must determine whether it was part of an effort to undermine the credibility of Plame's husband who was criticizing the White House.

Until this week, "the news media did it" was a standard defense among Republicans trying to protect the Bush administration from the political fallout of Fitzgerald's criminal investigation. Loyalists said that even if White House aides had passed on information, they didn't get it from classified sources and were simply repeating what they heard from journalists.

As new evidence accumulates on the public record, Libby's original source of information and how he passed the information on are becoming crucial unanswered questions. The public still doesn't know much about what the vice president and his top aide talked about, either.

In grand jury testimony shown to Rove, Libby said he had told Rove about information he had gotten about Wilson's wife from Russert, according to a person directly familiar with the information.

Prosecutors, however, have a different account from Russert. The TV network has said Russert told authorities he did not know about Wilson's wife's identity until it was published and therefore could not have told Libby about it. Russert also says that it was Libby who initiated the contact with him.

In Miller's case, the reporter was interviewing Libby on June 23, for a story on the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq when the vice president's chief of staff suggested a CIA tie for Wilson's wife, Miller has said.

"This was the first time I had been told that Mr. Wilson's wife might work for the CIA," Miller wrote in a first-person account over the weekend. Miller said this week that she never wrote a story about Wilson's wife because "it wasn't that important to me. I was focused on the main question: Was our WMD intelligence slanted?"


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: chamberlainbuff; cialeak; neville; wardchurchillbuff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

1 posted on 10/20/2005 3:53:53 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: churchillbuff

* yawn *


3 posted on 10/20/2005 3:56:13 PM PDT by airborne (Al-Queda can recruit on college campuses but the US military can't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

AP=BS


4 posted on 10/20/2005 3:56:17 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

"The evidence prosecutors have assembled in the CIA leak case suggests Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff sought out reporters in the weeks before an undercover operative's identity was compromised in the news media, casting doubt on one of the White House's main lines of defense."


Even worse, he actively sought out Chinese food in the weeks before Miller ate Chinese food, a clear link.

But seriously, thats not the issue. the issue is was she outed, according to the law or was any other crime committed.


5 posted on 10/20/2005 3:57:20 PM PDT by gondramB (Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Stupid talking to any NYT reporter.


6 posted on 10/20/2005 3:57:53 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
I don't care what happens to Libby."""

Some freeper claims that Libby was the lawyer for Clinton crony Marc Rich, the rich guy who was pardoned for something or other as Clinton went out the door.

7 posted on 10/20/2005 3:57:59 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: William Creel

Since Libby was Marc Rich's attorney, I don't care what happens to him either!


8 posted on 10/20/2005 3:59:04 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: William Creel

You should. The media will be on this for 2 years if Libby is indicted and if he resigns they'll go for Cheney.


9 posted on 10/20/2005 3:59:57 PM PDT by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
I'm sure Neville, that you're just giddy after reading this article.
10 posted on 10/20/2005 4:00:50 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Cindy Sheehan, Pat Buchanan, John Conyers, and David Duke Are Just Different Sides of the Same Coin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

It was me. CNN ran a story on Libby's background and he represented Marc Rich in the Clinton pardon!!! That makes me sick.


11 posted on 10/20/2005 4:00:52 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

"I don't care what happens to Libby.""""

It's not just Libby... he is the key guy in Cheney's strategy and acts frequently on Cheney's behalf. And we know how key Rove is to the President. The administration really needs a final report with no indictments.

And I think they will get it unless somebody said something stupid that contradicted another interview.


12 posted on 10/20/2005 4:01:30 PM PDT by gondramB (Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

"In light of all the disclosures...."

Wanna investigate where all the grand jury leaks are coming from?







13 posted on 10/20/2005 4:03:23 PM PDT by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
I hope FReepers are smart enough by now to recognize blatant BS when they read it.

In a Grand Jury investigation, THERE IS NO DEFENSE. Therefore there cannot be a 'crumbling' as the article suggests. IT IS AN INVESTIGATION, NOT A TRIAL.

14 posted on 10/20/2005 4:04:18 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald, you have a very leaky boat! You best investigate that.



15 posted on 10/20/2005 4:04:48 PM PDT by BlessedByLiberty (Respectfully submitted,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
From what I understand there will be no "final report". It's not allowed without a court order that's rarely granted. So if there are no indictments and no final report, this things going to be hanging around a long time with the left claiming cover-up.
16 posted on 10/20/2005 4:05:44 PM PDT by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
Fitzgerald has no legal authorization to write a report.

There will either be indictments, or there will be nothing.

17 posted on 10/20/2005 4:05:54 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
>> Prosecutors must determine whether it was part of an effort to undermine the credibility of Plame's husband who was criticizing the White House.

It is amazing that the investigation concerns compromising the "credibility" of Plame. The total intent of the operation was to compromise the "credibility" of a sitting POTUS using a burnt out 60's radical and his connected bitch.

This story comes from spook town central, only the senate intelligence committee has a possibility of getting to the bottom of this stink hole.

Talk about a bassackwards world.
18 posted on 10/20/2005 4:06:15 PM PDT by mmercier (through the looking glass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Thank you. This is just a load.


19 posted on 10/20/2005 4:06:21 PM PDT by A.Hun (Flagellum Dei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
That's strange, didn't know the White House needed a defense.

But, now that the al-AP brings it up, what exactly is wrong with the White House refuting Wilson's lies? Odd al-AP has lost their copy of the Senate committee report issued July 7, 2004 that proved Wilson a liar.
20 posted on 10/20/2005 4:06:55 PM PDT by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson