Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Catholic bishops support anti-torture bill
US Council of Catholic Bishops ^ | Oct. 4 2005 | US Council of Catholic Bishops

Posted on 10/20/2005 2:28:57 PM PDT by conserv13

There can be no compromise on the moral imperative protect the basic human rights of eery individual incarcerated for any reason.

(Excerpt) Read more at usccb.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: catholocism; mccain; senate; torture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
I am not Catholic but I agree with them here. This isn't a troll and I'm sure I'll get flamed. What do Christians and Catholics in particular think?
1 posted on 10/20/2005 2:29:01 PM PDT by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conserv13

And of course I spelled 'every' wrong. Long day.


2 posted on 10/20/2005 2:30:20 PM PDT by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conserv13

I am Catholic and I support doing whatever it take to get terrorists to rat each other out. Including killing them if they won't talk.


3 posted on 10/20/2005 2:30:29 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conserv13

It's not a suprise. They don't support capital punishment, abortion, euthanasia, embryonic stemcell research, and other things that follow.


4 posted on 10/20/2005 2:31:15 PM PDT by OpusatFR (Vegetarian, permaculturalist, cloth wearing, green, peak oil believing Trad Catholic Indie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I am not Catholic, but I agree with you. Whatever it takes, water board, ect.
5 posted on 10/20/2005 2:34:57 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR

I am a Catholic and I do not agree with this.

From what I have learned, this is not really an "anti-torture" bill. So the title is misleading.

What this is really about is making it so that we cannot use cruel, degrading, or inhuman methods on enemy combatants.

Cruel, degrading, and inhuman methods do NOT constitute torture.

I support the military in their use of cruel, degrading, and inhuman methods on foreign enemy combatants.


6 posted on 10/20/2005 2:36:12 PM PDT by joseph20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conserv13

but, its still okay to diddle a kid and hide the guilty party responsible. That's even crueller torture than making a terrorist wear a leash and underwear over his head.


7 posted on 10/20/2005 2:36:49 PM PDT by pipecorp (Let's have a CRUSADE! , the muslims have already started. 1700 replies and not a single post!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conserv13

Does anyone know if these Bishops ever spoke out specifically about the tortures under Saddam Hussein? I'm not trying to imply anything - I would just like to know.


8 posted on 10/20/2005 2:37:01 PM PDT by RAldrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I am Catholic and I support doing whatever it take to get terrorists to rat each other out. Including killing them if they won't talk.

LOL Then you are not really Catholic.

9 posted on 10/20/2005 2:37:48 PM PDT by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: conserv13

I'll be impressed when they get around to supporting AQ's anti-beheading bills.


10 posted on 10/20/2005 2:41:06 PM PDT by Sterm26 (Indict Joe Wilson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: joseph20
Cruel, degrading, and inhuman methods do NOT constitute torture.

Huh? It seems to me that cruel and inhuman methods would constitute torture. Degrading treatment is okay with me.

11 posted on 10/20/2005 2:41:32 PM PDT by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: conserv13

I most certainly am. Born, baptised, raised, schooled k-12, and happy member of St. Patrick's Parish. I think the Catholic Church is the greatest institution in history.

The Catholic Bishops also opposed nuclear weapons in the 70s and 80s. They have been wrong before and they likely will be so again.


12 posted on 10/20/2005 2:45:30 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: conserv13
Department of Social Development and World Peace
3211 FOURTH STREET NE •
WASHINGTON DC 20017-1194 •
FAX 202-541-3339
WEBSITE: WWW.USCCB.ORG/SDWP
Secretariat Domestic Social Development International Justice and Peace Environmental Justice Diocesan Relations
202-541-3180 202-541-3185 202-541-3199 202-541-3160 202-541-3195

October 4, 2005

Dear Senator:

On behalf of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, I urge you to support the McCain-Warner amendments numbers 1556 and 1557 to S. 1042, the FY 2006 Defense Authorization Act. The first amendment, number 1556, would prohibit cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment of persons under custody or control of the United States government. The second amendment, number 1557, would provide uniform standards for the interrogation of persons under detention of the Department of Defense.

As events unfold in Afghanistan, Iraq and other places, we recognize that combating terrorism remains a top priority for Congress and the Administration. We also recognize, however, that the reported instances of prisoner abuse by members of the U.S. armed services could seriously undermine that effort and compromise human dignity. We believe that a respect for the dignity of every person, ally or enemy, must serve as the foundation of the pursuit of security, justice and peace. There can be no compromise on the moral imperative to protect the basic human rights of any individual incarcerated for any reason.

The United States has a long history of leadership and strong support for human rights around the world. Ratifications of the Convention on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention Against Torture embody our nation’s commitment to establishing standards of conduct and prohibiting torture and other acts of inhumane treatment of persons in U.S. custody. Tragically, our nation’s record has been marred by reported instances of abusive treatment of enemy combatants held in military prisons in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The lack of clarity regarding the procedures governing the treatment of prisoners makes it necessary to adopt more specific and stringent guidelines. The McCain-Warner amendments to the Defense Authorization Act would confirm our nation’s resolve to ensure that these serious abuses cease and never recur.

We share the concerns of lawmakers and citizens for the safety of U.S. soldiers and civilians abroad in these times of great uncertainty and danger. In the face of this perilous climate, our nation must not embrace a morality based on an attitude that “desperate times call for desperate measures” or “the end justifies the means.” The inherent justice of our cause and the perceived necessities involved in confronting terrorism must not lead to a weakening or disregard of U.S. and international law.

In a time of terrorism and great fear, our individual and collective obligations to respect basic human dignity and human rights, even of our worst enemies, gains added importance. The guidelines and mechanisms contained in these amendments reflect a conviction that our nation must treat our prisoners as we would expect our enemies to treat our own military personnel. Congress’ adoption of these amendments would represent a significant step in restoring the moral credibility of the United States at a crucial time.

Thank you for your consideration of our views on the just treatment of prisoners and detainees.

Sincerely yours,

Most Reverend John H. Ricard, S.S.J.
Bishop of Pensacola-Tallahassee
Chairman, Committee on International Policy

13 posted on 10/20/2005 2:48:58 PM PDT by Anthem (The only 20th century advance in the science of government was to tax a little less to take more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conserv13
It seems to me that cruel and inhuman methods would constitute torture.

United States Code Section 2340 defines an act of torture:

(1) ''torture'' means an act committed by a person acting under the color of law specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person within his custody or physical control; (2) ''severe mental pain or suffering'' means the prolonged mental harm caused by or resulting from - (A) the intentional infliction or threatened infliction of severe physical pain or suffering; (B) the administration or application, or threatened administration or application, of mind-altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or the personality; (C) the threat of imminent death; or (D) the threat that another person will imminently be subjected to death, severe physical pain or suffering, or the administration or application of mind-altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or personality; and (3) ''United States'' includes all areas under the jurisdiction of the United States including any of the places described in sections 5 and 7 of this title and section 46501(2) of title 49.
Cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment does not constitute torture.
14 posted on 10/20/2005 2:56:16 PM PDT by joseph20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: conserv13
"What do Christians and Catholics in particular think?"

I am a Christian and here is what I think; I think that it is a great act of compassion to get information to save innocent lives any way possible. If one must use brutal methods to extract information from a bad guy to save innocent lives, then it is an act of comapssion to protect the innocent. It is in the name of saving lives. Its simple and clear to me, I dont see how it complicated.

15 posted on 10/20/2005 2:58:05 PM PDT by GregoTX (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

I don't want gratuitous torture for sadistic purposes. Just effective, proven methods. Waterboard works, sleep deprivation, bitch-slapping. And if they decide not to sing, then the time honored firing squad.


16 posted on 10/20/2005 2:58:08 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: joseph20

okay. I agree with you then.


17 posted on 10/20/2005 3:02:00 PM PDT by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Why not "ring them up" as a method of persuasion?


18 posted on 10/20/2005 3:02:05 PM PDT by NY Attitude (You are responsible for your safety until the arrival of Law Enforcement Officers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NY Attitude

Ring them up?


19 posted on 10/20/2005 3:17:10 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The old telephone hand cranked transformer, wire and clips.


20 posted on 10/20/2005 3:22:55 PM PDT by NY Attitude (You are responsible for your safety until the arrival of Law Enforcement Officers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson