Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man Gets 6 Years Probation In Child Assault
The Bryan-College Station Eagle ^ | October 19, 2005 | HOLLY HUFFMAN

Posted on 10/19/2005 5:13:07 AM PDT by texianyankee

A 20-year-old Franklin man accused of sexually assaulting two sisters who were living with his family was sentenced Tuesday to six years' deferred adjudication probation.

Lucas Jerald Pickering was indicted in August 2004 on five counts of sexual assault of a child and four counts of indecency with a child by sexual contact, all felonies.

Those charges were dismissed as part of a plea agreement, officials with the Robertson County District Attorney's Office said Tuesday. Instead, Pickering pleaded guilty to a single charge of injury to a child, a third-degree felony.

He also apologized to the sisters and acknowledged in court that the offenses were "nonconsensual."

Pickering and his father, James Pickering, had been accused of sexually assaulting the sisters, then minors, over several years. The sisters - nieces of the elder Pickering - had moved in with the family after their parents died.

James Pickering was indicted in August 2004 on five counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child, five counts of sexual assault of a child and two counts of indecency with a child by sexual contact. He was sentenced in May to concurrent eight-year prison terms after pleading guilty to two counts of indecency with a child.

As part of Lucas Pickering's plea agreement, he will be required to serve 90 consecutive days in the Robertson County Jail and undergo psychological testing, officials with the District Attorney's Office said.

If he fails to comply with the conditions of his probation, he could be sentenced to 10 years in prison, the full penalty allowed for injury to a child.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: childabuse; crime; sexualassault
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
Pickering agrees to plead guilty to "injury to a child!" Pickering apologizes to the sisters & acknowledges that the offenses were "non-consensual?"

This article doesnt give enough details, but it sounds like this guy wont even have to register as a "sex offender."

1 posted on 10/19/2005 5:13:10 AM PDT by texianyankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: texianyankee

Unbelievable.


2 posted on 10/19/2005 5:20:16 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Neither the depth of despondency nor the height of euphoria tells you how long either will last. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee
This has got to stop..I am so sick of these B getting off with just a pat on the wrist..when will the laws change and these insane animals get what they deserve..Just sick to death when they let these animals out to pray on little kids..A liberal judge and jury I presume..
3 posted on 10/19/2005 5:22:26 AM PDT by Beth528
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I believe it. Hell, its downright predictable at this point.


4 posted on 10/19/2005 5:23:25 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Ping


5 posted on 10/19/2005 5:27:56 AM PDT by stockpirate (John Kerry & FBI files ==> http://www.freerepublic.com/~stockpirate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I watched O'Reilly last night - he had another segment on someone getting a light sentence for sexual assault of a child....

I'm gonna email O'Reilly about this case. He needs to hear about this.

This case was heard in Robertson County - I dont know about this judge but I do know Robertson County has had local govt problems in the past.
Heck, they were one of the few Texas counties that voted for Gore over Dubya.


6 posted on 10/19/2005 5:30:58 AM PDT by texianyankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee

I'd like to go slap around the prosecutor who brokered this deal. Unless the defendant had some information in another case in exchange for a lighter sentence, I can't for the life of me understand how any DA could go for something like this. If there is no valid reason for this deal, let's hope the voters remember next time this D.A. is up for re-election.


7 posted on 10/19/2005 5:31:20 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

I mentioned the judge - but you are so correct, the DA has to be held accountable, too!


8 posted on 10/19/2005 5:32:31 AM PDT by texianyankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee
The American judicial system is really in awful shape. Hard core criminals routinely get a slap on the wrist, while some schmo with no prior record is given hard time for jay walking.

I recall a case a few years ago where a guy robbed a bank, but in the middle, just stopped and said he could do it, and asked them to call the police.

He put up no defense and the judge sentenced him to a minimum of 20 years.

Also a few years ago, I was listening to a Panama City TV station and a supermarket manager was viciously beaten, nearly to death. It turned out the Robber was one of the people convicted only a few years prior to a widely publicized tourist murder and was already out on parole to murder again.

9 posted on 10/19/2005 5:32:37 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee
Wow, this happened in Texas? Maybe we need to form a Minute Man (vigilante) group to take care of criminals when the courts do not.
10 posted on 10/19/2005 5:36:09 AM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee

The DA and Judge should be tarred and feathered.. 1 for making this deal.. and the other for accepting it.....

Maybe their children or grandchildren need to be victims for them to take this sort of thing seriously.


11 posted on 10/19/2005 5:37:50 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee
re : As part of Lucas Pickering's plea agreement, he will be required to serve 90 consecutive days in the Robertson County Jail and undergo psychological testing, officials with the District Attorney's Office.

I am not sure but does this mean he only gets to serve 90 days.

Those girls have a life sentence, child abuse never leaves you.

12 posted on 10/19/2005 5:38:20 AM PDT by tonycavanagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

I of course meant to say he "couldn't do it" not "could do it".


13 posted on 10/19/2005 5:39:01 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
re :Maybe their children or grandchildren need to be victims for them to take this sort of thing seriously.

I understand your anger but never say that.

14 posted on 10/19/2005 5:39:24 AM PDT by tonycavanagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

He might not have had enough evidence to convict. DAs are like that.


15 posted on 10/19/2005 5:41:19 AM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee
He also apologized to the sisters...

Well this, of course, explains the leniency of the "judge's" sentence.

The death penalty needs expansion.

16 posted on 10/19/2005 5:52:35 AM PDT by FerdieMurphy (For English, Dial One.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee
"This article doesnt give enough details, but it sounds like this guy wont even have to register as a "sex offender."

You got it. I see this all the time in my line of work. It doesn't matter how hard the community, law enforcement, investigators and child advocates work to get these people prosecuted and it doesn't even matter if there are detailed confessions; as soon as it hits the "prosecutor's" office and they start doing their dirty deals behind closed doors with the enthusiastic defenders of perverts, justice makes a quick exit, and with it the safety of the children in the community.

17 posted on 10/19/2005 5:53:38 AM PDT by sweetliberty (Stupidity should make you sterile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee

I wonder if the D.A. thought he couldn't get a conviction because the man was under 21, and the girls (perhaps) in their teens as well? It sure is a light sentence, when you consider the charges originally filed.


18 posted on 10/19/2005 5:53:53 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Neither the depth of despondency nor the height of euphoria tells you how long either will last. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Beth528
"A liberal judge and jury I presume.."

The majority of these perps never see a jury.

19 posted on 10/19/2005 5:55:38 AM PDT by sweetliberty (Stupidity should make you sterile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee

I can't understand these type of cases where they are allowed to plead-bargin. Especially when it involves children. Isn't Oprah currently doing Friday shows on enforcing laws. They should pressure Judge so community is aware of sentencing.


20 posted on 10/19/2005 5:58:28 AM PDT by newfrpr04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson