Posted on 10/18/2005 9:42:05 PM PDT by Nasty McPhilthy
Even for a man who made the cover of Newsweek before he was sworn in, it’s an impressive achievement. Senator Barack Obama, according to last week’s Tribune/WGN-TV poll, wins the approval of 72 percent of Illinois voters.
If that weren’t enough, state Republicans give the new Democratic senator a 57 percent approval rating.
These results will generate more speculation about his placement on the national ticket in 2008 or 2012. They will also fuel, if more fueling were needed, the media swoon over the junior senator.
He is, we’re told constantly, a star. That message has come from the New York Times, USA Today, CBS News, the Christian Science Monitor, NBC’s Andrea Mitchell and many other news outlets and talking heads.
OK, so the guy’s gotten phenomenal press coverage and that influences public opinion to some degree. Other than that, what has Obama done since election that’s made him so popular?
We know he’s extremely visible, shows up at town hall meetings, provides liaison with Federal agencies to constituents and turns out reams of self-serving press releases.
That’s pretty typical though.
So is what he says in the Congressional Record. Statements from Obama, such as the ones he made commending the Congressional Black Caucus on its work on behalf of Afro-Colombians and congratulating Northwestern University’s women’s lacrosse team, are routine fare.
As is the senator’s inflated ego. In Time magazine this summer, he compared himself to an American icon:
"In Lincoln’s rise from poverty, his ultimate mastery of language and law, his capacity to overcome personal loss and remain determined in the face of repeated defeat - in all this, he reminded me not just of my own struggles."
That’s right. Lincoln’s challenges remind him of not just his own struggles, but even other people’s. You know, those common folks who aren’t superstar senators.
Maybe the reason Barack Obama is so popular with Illinoisans is the way he’s representing them in Washington. Perhaps he votes on issues the way we want him to.
When this session of Congress ends, assorted groups will compile the votes related to their special interest and issue a rating for each member of Congress. Organizations from both Left and Right and everywhere in between do this. The ratings are helpful in identifying where elected officials stand on particular issues.
Mr. Obama hasn’t been in Washington long enough to be ranked by most of the groups. That doesn’t mean, however, that he hasn’t established a record.
Since the senator was sworn in, there have been 255 recorded Senate votes. He’s missed seven.
Of the remainder, he’s voted the same as Senator Edward Kennedy well over 90 percent of the time. I selected Kennedy’s record to compare for a reason.
Say whatever you want about Teddy – and I have - there’s little doubt that he is a liberal’s liberal.
Unlike many of his colleagues, Kennedy doesn’t conduct an opinion survey to decide how he will vote. He is philosophically pure and unyieldingly dogmatic.
Kennedy can afford to be. Bay Staters have repeatedly shown a willingness to keep him in the Senate no matter what. Heck, he could probably get away with murder and they’d still support him.
Teddy is a living caricature of Big Government: Fat, bloated and out of control. Most of the people in Massachusetts want that type of representation.
But is that what the people of Illinois yearn for? A liberal who votes with Kennedy more than nine times out of ten?
Kerry won the state in last year’s election, but that was because of the People’s Republic of Chicago. Of the state’s 102 counties, 88 went for George W. Bush.
Obama’s voting record doesn’t reflect his constituency. The Illinois electorate may not have intended to send Kennedy Lite to the Senate, but that’s what it did.
And today a big majority, including Republicans for heaven’s sake, approve of what he’s doing.
There’s the story of a woman conducting a public opinion poll by telephone. One of the questions was, "Which do you thing is the greater danger to our survival, ignorance or apathy?" She called a man whose reply was, "I don’t know and I don’t care."
The superstar should be thankful he’s blessed with so many constituents like that man.
Mike Bates
I'll have to get with the program. After all, there's nothing like liberals fawning over other liberals.
Big deal...the empty suits and skirts of MSM love the empty Senator.
The power of MSM propaganda on display. This man is so completely and utterly depraved that he voted to allow the outright cold-blooded murder of innocents who happened to survive a "procedure" carried out in an abortion "clinic." Yet another little sockpuppet of George Soros.
Illinois has become every bit as blue as Massachusetts. The Republican party here is an utter farce.
Shows how stupid and ineffectual some "Republicans" can be.
And yes, "the power of MSM propaganda on display."
Considering that Obama gets 100% favorable coverage in the Chicago Libune, such poll numbers aren't surprising. It is rare that the Libune goes a day without promoting that man in its news articles.
He did and they do.
I remember the media swoon over Jim Florio when, as governor of New Jersey, he rammed through a massive tax hike. He got his picture on Newsweek and everything. He was Presidential timber, yes sir.
In the end of course, he was just another scumbag, just like Obama.
MJK
Always giving each other awards of some sort.
While I agree that Obama will likely be a Dem prez candidate in the near future, I've haven't read or seen anything about him that would indicate to me that he's not just another Dick Turban, egg-sucking, liberal prez wannabe. His comments in the wake of Katrina were typically liberally reprehensible. By being a little more circumspect when he speaks, he appears to be a little brighter than Turban...which is not saying much.
Tribune endorsed Bush.
The Trib EDITORIAL BOARD still has some vestiges of non-Liberalism. The Tribune national news reporters, their news articles, and their commentators are solidly (almost unanimously) left-wing. One must distinguish between the impact of a once-every-four-years endorsement, and the daily barrage of left-wing slanted news articles and commentary, to see the true impact of a newspaper.
Re Trib:
Point taken. Wall Street Journal another example.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.