Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Faces 'Extreme' Temperature Changes: Study
AFP | 10-17-2005 | not given

Posted on 10/18/2005 6:08:43 AM PDT by boris

US Faces 'Extreme' Temperature Changes: Study

Washington (AFP) Oct 17, 2005

The continental United States will face more extreme temperatures during the next century and worse rainfall along its Gulf Coast which has been ravaged by hurricanes this year, according to a climate study released Monday.

The study, published on the online edition of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, warned that greenhouse gases will likely swell to twice their current levels by the century's end.

"Imagine the weather during the hottest two weeks of the year," lead researcher Noah Diffenbaugh said, referring to northeast United States.

"The area could experience temperatures in that range lasting for periods of up to two months by century's end," he said.

Researchers claimed the study, run on supercomputers at Purdue University in Indiana state, is the most comprehensive climate model to date.

It predicts the southwest United States could endure as much as a 500 percent increase in hot events, leaving less water for the growing population, that the Gulf Coast region would receive more rainfall in shorter time spans and that summers in the northeast would be shorter and hotter.

Overall, the United States would experience a warming trend, the study predicts.

"The changes our model predicts are large enough to substantially disrupt our economy and infrastructure," said Diffenbaugh, an assistant professor of earth and atmospheric sciences at Purdue University.

In addition to greenhouse gasses, the model considered factors such as ocean currents, cloud formations and vegetation.

The model considered circumstances not fully included in previous models, such as snow which reflects energy from the sun back into space, and mountain peaks, which can stand in the way of travelling weather fronts.

Scientists also checked the model's efficacy by analyzing the period 1961 to 1985. "The model performed admirably," Diffenbaugh said, adding it's "the most detailed projection of climate change that we have for the US."


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fud; globalwarming; globalwarmingping; scaretactics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 10/18/2005 6:08:45 AM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: boris

In 90 years we'll have better air condtioners...


2 posted on 10/18/2005 6:10:20 AM PDT by Dallas59 (“You love life, while we love death.” - Al-Qaeda / Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris

Its been a nice Fall in Ohio......


3 posted on 10/18/2005 6:12:35 AM PDT by Mikey_1962
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris

When these guys can predict a hurricane track accurately over 5 days, then I may be interested in what they have to say about 95 years from now.


4 posted on 10/18/2005 6:12:52 AM PDT by Netheron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

You stole my thunder. ;-)
I was going to post, yea, we call it Fall.


5 posted on 10/18/2005 6:13:43 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: boris

Overall, the United States would experience a warming trend, the study predicts.

***

That's fine by me. We had an extended summer up until about a week or so ago -- quite unusual to have 80 degrees in October around here. And I loved it. Even now, it's not too bad -- temps in the 60's.

I love to upset my global warming/greenhouse effect friends by telling them, if this is global warming, I'll take it. Don't mind it at all. Boy does that get their blood boiling.

Sorry, I don't buy all these alleged scientific theories.


6 posted on 10/18/2005 6:15:58 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Netheron
When these guys can predict a hurricane track accurately over 5 days, then I may be interested in what they have to say about 95 years from now.

LOL! So true.

7 posted on 10/18/2005 6:15:58 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: boris

Oh and by the way...if this does turn out to be true and we are headed for disaster....

It's Bush's fault. :)


8 posted on 10/18/2005 6:17:31 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
model's efficacy by analyzing the period 1961 to 1985

That should put a multimillion year old earth in perspective. /sarcasm

9 posted on 10/18/2005 6:18:04 AM PDT by bmwcyle (We broke Pink's Code and found a terrorist message)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
...published on the online edition of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences...

The blog of a unrefereed journal. How impressive.

10 posted on 10/18/2005 6:19:02 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
The model considered circumstances not fully included in previous models, such as snow which reflects energy from the sun back into space, and mountain peaks, which can stand in the way of travelling weather fronts.

I think their models have silicone implants.

11 posted on 10/18/2005 6:19:04 AM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1 (Lock-n-load!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
The earth goes into long term cycles of hot+dry, hot+wet, cold+dry, cold+wet, over and over and over. These cycles are 500 years to 10 years and often there are cycles with cycles. Man's little 'farts' of greenhouse gasses into the hurricane of natures cycles have no effect.
12 posted on 10/18/2005 6:20:19 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: boris

2 Months of string Bikinis? Most Excellent.


13 posted on 10/18/2005 6:21:01 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
Scientists also checked the model's efficacy by analyzing the period 1961 to 1985. "The model performed admirably,"

I can make a model that would predict every election from 1961 to 1985 and have it perform 'admirably', but it still could predict 2006 worth a squat. I can't believe all these clowns calling themselves 'scientists' these days. This ain't science.

14 posted on 10/18/2005 6:21:59 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

The earth is getting warmer because the sun is warmer than its been in about 1000 years.... The very idea that we as people could somehow kill the earth is rediculous. Even if we detnoated every nuclear weapon we had, LIFE and the eart would survive.


15 posted on 10/18/2005 6:22:10 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: boris

Well, the globalists have done a super job of emptying out the upper Midwest over the past 50 years. We have a surplus of underused infrastructure, no hurricanes, and no earthquakes.

In addition, we have lots of fresh water.

I contend that national security dictates that this country should move more of its critical economic activity to its interior.

Insurance company exposure management should also encourage folks to move away from the coast.


16 posted on 10/18/2005 6:22:14 AM PDT by Francis Joseph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris

Even thought I don't buy this greenhouse gas crap I have to ask, what does this have to do with the US?? China is the worlds number one polluter as most of our manufacturing has moved to their shores. They are switching from bicycles to cars and have no "EPA" department to worry about.


17 posted on 10/18/2005 6:22:21 AM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

The earth goes into long term cycles of hot+dry, hot+wet, cold+dry, cold+wet, over and over and over. These cycles are 500 years to 10 years and often there are cycles with cycles. Man's little 'farts' of greenhouse gasses into the hurricane of natures cycles have no effect.

***

I agree. We had a local meterologist, now retired, who was asked once about all this global warming/greenhouse nonsense. He said it was just that -- nonsense. Our weather goes through cycles. You should have heard the noise from the enviro-weenies about that. Frankly, I'd trust this guy, who had been a meterologist for a good 50 years or more(and a durn good one), than these young twits who look at a thunderstorm in lower Slobovia and predict a major weather disaster 7,000 years from now.


18 posted on 10/18/2005 6:23:40 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: boris

AFP = Agence France-Presse

They may have an agenda against the U.S.


19 posted on 10/18/2005 6:24:11 AM PDT by 300magnum (We know that if evil is not confronted, it gains in strength and audacity, and returns to strike us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
National Academy of Sciences

Stopped reading right there.

20 posted on 10/18/2005 6:24:39 AM PDT by add925 (The Left = Xenophobes in Denial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson