Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: boris
Scientists also checked the model's efficacy by analyzing the period 1961 to 1985. "The model performed admirably,"

I can make a model that would predict every election from 1961 to 1985 and have it perform 'admirably', but it still could predict 2006 worth a squat. I can't believe all these clowns calling themselves 'scientists' these days. This ain't science.

14 posted on 10/18/2005 6:21:59 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Always Right
I can make a model that would predict every election from 1961 to 1985 and have it perform 'admirably', but it still could predict 2006 worth a squat.

Of course it would --- it would demonstrate that Republicans will control the White House for the majority of the future.

27 posted on 10/18/2005 6:33:36 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (9-11 is your Peace Dividend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Always Right
I can't believe all these clowns calling themselves 'scientists' these days.

I call them scientwists. They twist the science in the direction of political needs and funding.

They can't get it through their stupid ("educated") skulls that we are on the mercy of SUN and energy we are getting from it, subject to sunspot and long term cycles, which they can do squat to affect. We are heading for sunspot minimum and we can expect couple more years of extreme weather, hotter, drier summers, colder, wetter winters. Check your snowblower, wax yer skies and enjoy!

45 posted on 10/18/2005 7:23:56 AM PDT by Leo Carpathian (FReeeePeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson