Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Petition for the Withdrawal of the Nomination of Harriet Miers to the U.S. Supreme Court
NRO ^ | 10/12/05 | David Frum

Posted on 10/12/2005 5:26:46 PM PDT by StatenIsland

WE ARE REPUBLICANS AND CONSERVATIVES who supported the election of George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004. Today, we respectfully urge that the nomination of Harriet Miers to the United States Supreme Court be withdrawn.

The next justice of the Supreme Court should be a person of clear, consistent, and unashamed conservative judicial philosophy.

The next justice should be a person of unquestioned personal and political independence.

The next justice should be someone who has demonstrated a deep engagement in the constitutional issues that regularly come before the Supreme Court — and an appreciation of the originalist perspective on those issues.

The next justice should be a person of the highest standard of intellectual and legal excellence.

For all Harriet Miers. many fine qualities and genuine achievements, we the undersigned believe that she is not that person. An attempt to push her nomination through the Senate will only split the Republican party, damage the Bush presidency, and cast doubts upon the Court itself.

Sometimes Americans elect Republican presidents, sometimes we elect Democratic presidents. Whatever the differences between the parties, surely we can at least agree on this: Each party owes America its best. There is a wide range of truly outstanding legal talents who share the president’s judicial philosophy. We believe that on second thought President Bush can do better — for conservatism, for the Supreme Court, for America.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antibush; auntharriet; crapnomination; deargeorgeandlaura; frum; miers; nro; petition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-307 next last
To: claudiustg

----Hearings are the format that the Senate's role has taken. It has been this way for some time.----

So?

-Dan

261 posted on 10/12/2005 10:36:04 PM PDT by Flux Capacitor (Trust me. I know what I'm doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Flux Capacitor

The Senate can 'advise and consent' any jolly way it feels like.


262 posted on 10/12/2005 10:38:03 PM PDT by drlevy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

I scanned the thread, but didn't see where anyone ever answered if Frum is a citizen of the United States. If he's not then it's pretty ironic to have a Canadian using "we Republicans" and demanding his exboss pony up.

Tacky tacky tacky.


263 posted on 10/12/2005 10:39:46 PM PDT by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: Flux Capacitor

---So?---

My little brother used to do that when he was about 4.


264 posted on 10/12/2005 10:40:34 PM PDT by claudiustg (Go Bush! Go Sharon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

Really? Maybe you should ask him to help you find that bit about Senate hearings in the Constitution. :)

-Dan

265 posted on 10/12/2005 10:42:42 PM PDT by Flux Capacitor (Trust me. I know what I'm doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

Petition signed. Guess this makes me a "sexist". :)

-Dan

266 posted on 10/12/2005 10:43:44 PM PDT by Flux Capacitor (Trust me. I know what I'm doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland
"The action and rhetoric from both camps could have dire consequences for the party..."

Yeah, you could wind up with Gonzales.

267 posted on 10/12/2005 10:45:51 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

----It's time for a whole bunch of us to shut up.----

Gotta love that First Amendment. (And no fair telling Harriet what it says before her exams!)

-Dan

268 posted on 10/12/2005 10:56:45 PM PDT by Flux Capacitor (Trust me. I know what I'm doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin

----Ummm - a few weeks ago -weren't we conservatives arguing that the pick is the President's and that the Senate et al should butt out?----

No, what we conservatives have been arguing all along is that the pick is the President's, and that the Senate should allow that pick to come to an up-or-down vote.

And now, many (very many) of us are saying that when and if this particular nominee comes to the Senate floor, she should be voted way down.

-Dan

269 posted on 10/12/2005 11:03:45 PM PDT by Flux Capacitor (Trust me. I know what I'm doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: inquest

Anyone who recognizes that the President serves the people and is accountable to them for his decisions, raise your hand.




Oh, me me!


270 posted on 10/12/2005 11:08:07 PM PDT by trubluolyguy (Dude seriously, if you don't quit being so poor I'm gonna start huckin' rocks at ya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: inquest

----Anyone who recognizes that the President serves the people and is accountable to them for his decisions, raise your hand.----

"Hm? Oh, sorry chum, I wasn't listening.... too busy workin' HARD, workin' HARD.... what was the question again?"

271 posted on 10/12/2005 11:15:55 PM PDT by Flux Capacitor (Trust me. I know what I'm doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: jdm

I agree with the President 9/10 times.



Only 9/10?


You TROOOOOOOOLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!


(sarcasm)


272 posted on 10/12/2005 11:35:05 PM PDT by trubluolyguy (Dude seriously, if you don't quit being so poor I'm gonna start huckin' rocks at ya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

I agree with the statements expressed in this petition. Nuff said.


273 posted on 10/12/2005 11:37:07 PM PDT by Ciexyz (Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

Regardless of this petition, Bush isn't going to withdraw this nomination, much to the chagrin of the lynch mob at NRO. I think in time, we'll be reading pundits writing about the mistakes that they made in underestimating the judgement of President Bush.


274 posted on 10/12/2005 11:50:03 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Don't Get Stuck On Stupid!" - Lieutenant General Russell "Ragin' Cajun" Honore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Given George Bushs other judicial nominations have been pretty good (conservative), why do some people think Harriet Miers isn't?



Because the others had a paper trail. Meiers doesn't. "Trust me" doesn't cut it.


275 posted on 10/13/2005 12:08:56 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (Dude seriously, if you don't quit being so poor I'm gonna start huckin' rocks at ya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Sorry not proof of anything. Care to make a case why she is unqualified to be on SC other then "She is Bush's pick and I am mad at Bush"?




How about you tell us why she IS qualified?


276 posted on 10/13/2005 12:14:17 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (Dude seriously, if you don't quit being so poor I'm gonna start huckin' rocks at ya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy
"How about you tell us why she IS qualified?"

I think that her main qualification (in the eyes of this administration) is the fact that she went to SMU. This is the only qualification I can come up with after following the news for the past few days. SMU is where Laura Bush received her bachelor's degree, served on their Board Of Trustees, where "SMU dedicated the Laura Bush Promenade, a sitting and garden area outside SMU’s Fondren Library Center. Texas Governor George W. Bush funded the promenade as a Christmas gift honoring his wife’s contributions to the advancement of literacy and literature...", where there is no doubt George W's presidential library will be built, and of course Harriet Myers' presence on the USSC will permanently elevate the status of the SMU law school.

"Governor Bush gave the address at SMU’s 84th annual commencement ceremony. He began his speech by saying: “The best decision I made in life was to marry into the SMU family.”

277 posted on 10/13/2005 12:34:46 AM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: monkapotamus
* bump *

The hits just keep on piling on.

278 posted on 10/13/2005 12:36:44 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy
Given George Bushs other judicial nominations have been pretty good (conservative), why do some people think Harriet Miers isn't?

Because Alberto Gonzales had picked all of them as Bush's Legal Counsel.
Once he went up to AG and Miers took over, there was a serious brain drain, resulting in nothing but old, stalled nominees getting renominated. Following that, her office hit rock bottom when it was so scrapped for new ideas that it nominated Miers herself.
279 posted on 10/13/2005 12:40:22 AM PDT by counterpunch (Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Sorry not proof of anything. Care to make a case why she is unqualified to be on SC other then "She is Bush's pick and I am mad at Bush"? Guess you all have not been listening to people like Scalia and Pickering on this.

Sorry, but you've got it backwards. A person isn't presumed fit for the Supreme Court until proved otherwise.
It is a pretty exclusive gig.

And Scalia never endorsed Miers. He wasn't even talking about her directly. He merely said that lack of judicial experience specifically did not by itself disqualify a nominee.
280 posted on 10/13/2005 12:50:37 AM PDT by counterpunch (Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-307 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson