Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Couric: Breaking the Law is "the Way this White House Possibly Operates"
Today Show/Newsbusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 10/12/2005 4:53:45 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last
To: real saxophonist

LOL. And yes, I can attest that he did, because 'he,'Finkelstein, is 'me,' governsleastgovernsbest!


101 posted on 10/12/2005 7:37:43 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (check out my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: AlexW
Why would anyone watch this piece of garbage program?

I watch and report because I think it's worthwhile keeping track of what the MSM are up to.

102 posted on 10/12/2005 7:39:54 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (check out my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Too true. I think there's something about the name "Scooter Libby" that makes MSM-types feel like real insiders when they pronounce it


103 posted on 10/12/2005 7:42:14 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (check out my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1

Great point!


104 posted on 10/12/2005 7:43:08 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (check out my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: massadvj
I don't understand what everyone is upset about. She said 'possibly.' You are taking everything out of context.

Unless Couric thought the notion had credibility she would never have raised it. Sneaking in qualifiers like "possibly" or "some say" is nothing more than a technique Katie uses to give herself some cover when expressing her own opinions.

I'm guessing you didn't see the actual interview. If you had, I don't think you'd have any doubt that she was expressing her personal viewpoint and making a very serious accusation.

105 posted on 10/12/2005 7:48:10 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (check out my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Unless Couric thought the notion had credibility she would never have raised it. Sneaking in qualifiers like "possibly" or "some say" is nothing more than a technique Katie uses to give herself some cover when expressing her own opinions.

I am well aware. Guess I should have put a sarcasm tag on my post. Thought it was obvious.

106 posted on 10/12/2005 7:56:43 AM PDT by massadvj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: massadvj

Sorry about that. I guess sarcasm sometimes gets lost in the cyberspace translation!


107 posted on 10/12/2005 8:32:17 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (check out my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

I'd like to turn Katie Couric over my knee and give her a good sound bottom-blistering spanking...and not just for the pleasure of having her squirming on my lap.


108 posted on 10/12/2005 8:34:13 AM PDT by RichInOC (Two-block the Jolly Roger. Set Condition 1SQ. Spin up all missiles. This is not a drill. Arghhhhh...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #109 Removed by Moderator

To: Texas Songwriter

Can you hate Katie Couric and still think the Bush administration broke the law?

I am too damn Conservative to stand by this Presidnet any longer.


110 posted on 10/12/2005 8:52:04 AM PDT by richconklin (A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes. - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

Never heard of Rockwell...good investment?


111 posted on 10/12/2005 8:53:34 AM PDT by Hildy ( liberals cannot change the present, and cannot effect the future, so they MUST relive the past...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: richconklin
I don't hate Couric. I don't know her, except as a public figure, and I think she as a public figure is a disgrace, but I wouldn't say I hate her.

I like the President, but I do not know him personally. But in watching him he seems to extole virtues which I admire and he talks about things indicating a world view which I too have.

I, too, am discouraged as a conservative. I have told my wife that I am an anachronism stuck in a morally flexible time that I will never adapt to. I am more vocal about my conservative world view than most people I talk to. I guess I want to believe the President. But these are trying times if you are a conservative, I agree.

112 posted on 10/12/2005 8:58:56 AM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter
Is there any truth to what they are saying regarding culpability?

Anything you see from them at this point is conjecture. A simple reading of the statute in question would infer that, since Plame had not been covert for over five years, no crime could have been committed, along with other complicating factors. But we'll have to wait and see what comes from Fitzgerald.

I have felt there has been better analysis on Free Republic and it seemed to make sense, but the conventional MSM wisdom seems to be universal among those pundits who know they will look like assholes if they are as wrong as we here on FR think they are.

I have come to the conclusion that they don't care, because they play to a left-wing audience that is already the biggest bunch of a-holes on the planet.

So,....are they? And Why?

Because they cannot retain their political worldviews and simultaneously deal with the truth.

113 posted on 10/12/2005 9:00:45 AM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I have arrived about the same place you are. But my question is this. Let's you and me assume we are correct, and Couric,Matthews,et.al., are wrong and Fitzgerald does not indict Rove or Libby. They know they will appear to be stupid, illinformed, idiots to their base. We already know what they are, even if they are correct in their analysis, history has born that out. But, if they are wrong, and they have spent hours in conjecture on the airwaves about Rove and Libby, they will look like absolute idiots. I do think they care about that, don't you. I have not heard one person in the MSM cadre expound on the possibility of a Wilson, Plame, Miller, Russert, indictment, but it is repleat here on FR. Are we thinking wishfully do you think?


114 posted on 10/12/2005 9:09:03 AM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: All

When a broadcast "personality" has to hit below the belt (think: Dan Rather) to gain national attention, we know they are singing their swan song.

Katie's next stop: Filling in for Martha's "Apprentice".

She is so o-v-e-r.


115 posted on 10/12/2005 9:14:41 AM PDT by imintrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

She'd like it way too much LOL.


116 posted on 10/12/2005 9:16:11 AM PDT by sono (I knew I was going to take the wrong train, so I left early. L Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
"This special prosecutor wouldn't be spending all of this time and not indict anyone".

Implying that he must indict somebody to justify his investigation.

As you know, no law was broken. The Moonbats at cBS are dreaming again because they know too.

117 posted on 10/12/2005 9:17:16 AM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

You know Mark, I watch the show for much that same reasons as you do, but today I just couldn't stomach it. When Katie Colonoscopy started tag-teaming with that phony Matt Lauer I just had to change the channel today.

I predicted to myself this morning that it would be "ROVE, ROVE, ROVE...VALERIE PLAME...JUDITH MILLER, and what about IRAQ? BUSH INTROUBLE, KATRINA, IRAQ, CONSERVATIVE HATE MIER, BLAH,BLAH, BLAH. I just couldn't take it anymore.

Thanks for the report as always.


118 posted on 10/12/2005 9:22:20 AM PDT by subterfuge (Obama, mo mama...er Osama-La bamba, uh, bama...banana rama...URP!---Ted Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

I like your reply the best!


119 posted on 10/12/2005 9:23:18 AM PDT by lorris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

Despite being a veteran Couric-watcher, I was truly shocked when Katie bared her fangs this morning, revealing the depth of her hatred of the Bush administration, suggesting that breaking the law is its SOP.


120 posted on 10/12/2005 9:28:26 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (check out my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson