I have arrived about the same place you are. But my question is this. Let's you and me assume we are correct, and Couric,Matthews,et.al., are wrong and Fitzgerald does not indict Rove or Libby. They know they will appear to be stupid, illinformed, idiots to their base. We already know what they are, even if they are correct in their analysis, history has born that out. But, if they are wrong, and they have spent hours in conjecture on the airwaves about Rove and Libby, they will look like absolute idiots. I do think they care about that, don't you. I have not heard one person in the MSM cadre expound on the possibility of a Wilson, Plame, Miller, Russert, indictment, but it is repleat here on FR. Are we thinking wishfully do you think?
When a broadcast "personality" has to hit below the belt (think: Dan Rather) to gain national attention, we know they are singing their swan song.
Katie's next stop: Filling in for Martha's "Apprentice".
She is so o-v-e-r.
Indeed and that's why we're hearing mutterings IF Fitzgerald does not indict, it will be a waste of taxpayers money for him to have spent two years for naught. In short, the fix is in and it was on our dime. They will never take the blame for faulty reporting.