Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IWF Supports Nomination of Harriet Miers to the High Court
Independent Women's Forum ^ | 10/3/2005

Posted on 10/11/2005 11:41:15 PM PDT by syriacus

WASHINGTON, DC -- The Independent Women’s Forum supports the president’s nomination today of Harriet Miers to fill the seat vacated by retiring Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor.

"Ms. Miers has had a long and distinguished career as one of the foremost lawyers in the country makes her a well qualified candidate. Members from both sides of the aisle have recognized her professional achievements and qualifications and recommended her to the President as a nominee," said IWF senior vice president Michelle Bernard.

"While IWF supports the nomination of Harriet Miers to be associate justice of the Supreme Court, IWF rejects the feminist argument that the seat to which she was nominated is a 'woman's seat.'" continued Bernard. "In originally nominating John Roberts to replace Justice O'Connor, the President laid to rest the notion that any one sex or ethnic group owns a particular seat on the Court. Having established that principle last summer, and having elevated John Roberts to be chief justice, the President was free to make this selection free from concerns of gender politics."

"The president selected his trusted friend and attorney Harriet Miers. We do not doubt that Ms. Miers is qualified for the post, and for that reason, the Senate should act quickly to confirm her," added Bernard.

"Only time will tell whether Ms. Miers will be a justice who understands the difference between law and politics and who exercises her judicial power with restraint. We are cautiously optimistic."


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: iwf; miers; praise
The Independent Women's Forum was established to combat the women-as-victim, pro-big-government ideology of radical feminism. We seek to restore, strengthen, and extend that which promotes women's well being by advancing the principles of self-reliance, political freedom, economic liberty, and personal responsibility.
1 posted on 10/11/2005 11:41:16 PM PDT by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Info on IWF, in post #1, is from About IWF
2 posted on 10/11/2005 11:43:10 PM PDT by syriacus (Harriet Miers deserves hearings and an up/down vote, not rocks thrown by "Harriet's Harriers")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

Well the big dog has spoken! (Please excuse my word choice.)


3 posted on 10/11/2005 11:51:16 PM PDT by Maynerd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maynerd
Well, before you dis them, you may want to read about them from their web page...

The Independent Women's Forum was established to combat the women-as-victim, pro-big-government ideology of radical feminism. We seek to restore, strengthen, and extend that which promotes women's well being by advancing the principles of self-reliance, political freedom, economic liberty, and personal responsibility.

4 posted on 10/12/2005 12:47:54 AM PDT by adamsjas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: adamsjas

Your pleas for reason with many on FR will go unheeded. Some have simply gone over the cliff. Anybody or any organization choosing to support Miers is immediately dubbed a Bushbot or a Kool-Aid drinker. Conservative stalwarts like Leonard Leo, James Dobson, Jay Sekulow, Hugh Hewitt and others have immediately have had their conservative bona fides questioned in the most insulting way.

As Bush said yesterday he's not going to withdraw her name from consideration and she WILL be confirmed regardless of the hols from the madding crowd.


5 posted on 10/12/2005 5:21:04 AM PDT by Neville72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham; Miss Marple
Ping to DNDMSB.

The group Barbara Olson started endorses Meirs. Bunch of cronies right with your DUmmie rhetoric.

6 posted on 10/12/2005 5:21:41 AM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maynerd
Well the big dog has spoken! (Please excuse my word choice.)

Excuse your choice? Sure.

7 posted on 10/12/2005 5:27:23 AM PDT by syriacus (Harriet Miers deserves hearings and an up/down vote, not rocks thrown by "Harriet's Harriers")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Nice hackneyed recitation of meaningless cliches you have there.

Concerned Women for America opposes her nomination, so I guess that means you folks will have to stop relying on that "she's a born-again, biblethumping evangelical" selling point, huh?

8 posted on 10/12/2005 5:40:35 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson