Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

80% of Potential SCOTUS Nominees on W's List Decline His Offer
Fox News | 10-11-05 | freedom4me

Posted on 10/11/2005 9:08:44 PM PDT by freedom4me

During the 11:00 p.m. (CST) newsbreak, Donna Fuducia reported that Karl Rove told James Dobson that 80% of the potential SCOTUS nominees on the President's list declined his offer because of they didn't want to undergo the grueling confirmation process. Perhaps this sheds new light on the reason why W chose Miers.


TOPICS: Government; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bush43; judicialnominees; miers; nothanks; rove; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 761-770 next last
To: JCEccles

It did not have to be a woman. Ok. Let's see. Lets put up 4 men, 4 woman, and a half-and-half. Make you feel better?


401 posted on 10/11/2005 10:42:37 PM PDT by gpapa (Boost FR Traffic! Make FR your home page!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Meanwhile, is a recess appointment out of the question?

No. but any recess appointment made this year expires in January 2007. I wouldn't put it past the 'Rats to block a vote until then and effectively make the President's SCOTUS Appointments expire with his administration in January 2009 at the latest. That does us no good at all, IMHO. We have to win confirmation.

402 posted on 10/11/2005 10:42:57 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (Lashed to the USS George W. Bush: "Damn the Torpedos, Full Miers Ahead!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

It was pretty entertaining. He entertwined it with a story about his dog, his father (who stuffed sausages for a living), Moses, and the Constitution. During a 3 hour floor speech! I kid you not! LOL!


403 posted on 10/11/2005 10:43:01 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Don't Get Stuck On Stupid!" - Lieutenant General Russell "Ragin' Cajun" Honore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
Each House sets its own rules.

Each house can set procedural rules affecting only it. To change the hurdel from simple majority to "whatver the Senate says it will be" for confirming nominations is a substantive change that alters the balance of power.

We can see the alteration of balance of power unfolding right before our eyes, this week, but it (perversion of the Constitution) ain't being discussed much. This hits the Office of the President right in the shorts. Frist and the GOP Senators were all hot on this in May. Now the whol lot of them is cowering in the corner.

Sissy boys. Worthless crap.

the 60-vote supermajority is so outrageous that it would justify the President vetoing every appoipriations bill until there were up-or-down votes on nominees -- including Bolton. Unfortunately, the President might lose doing that as well.

Those founders were clever. They devised various ways for the branches to play "scissors/paper/rock" with each other. The president can nominate who he wants, and if the Senate doesn't act by recess, he goes around them with a recess appointment. He did it with Bolton.

Bean-bag politics champions - GOP.

404 posted on 10/11/2005 10:43:03 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Here is a crazy thought ... hear what she has to say before you throw her under the bus or not

In your eyes .. she is guilty before she is allowed to present her case

405 posted on 10/11/2005 10:43:19 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY

I wouldn't. Then again, I'm not on any such list either.
---
But you're the Hitman! Every time I see your tag, I think of the PS2 game. Do you wear a dark suit and glasses? :D


406 posted on 10/11/2005 10:44:06 PM PDT by BamaGirl (The Framers Rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
This site must not be hijacked by bitter Buchananites, moronic third party voters, and trolls.

"Bitter Buchananites, moronic third party voters, and trolls, oh my! Run, Toto, run! Auntie Em, Auntie Em, it's a twister, it's a twister! There's no place like home! There's no place like home!"

407 posted on 10/11/2005 10:44:15 PM PDT by Map Kernow ("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/04/18/INGLN65IT81.DTL


408 posted on 10/11/2005 10:44:24 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: Kryptonite

I gather that the President can count better than you.


409 posted on 10/11/2005 10:44:32 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Meanwhile, is a recess appointment out of the question?

Yes

410 posted on 10/11/2005 10:45:10 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

What Pat crowd. I do not see too many people named Pat around here.


411 posted on 10/11/2005 10:45:19 PM PDT by gpapa (Boost FR Traffic! Make FR your home page!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
When I think of crony ....

Abe Fortas. Robert Kennedy. Maybe "Brownie." Miers will have the face the charge of "crony," even if it's deemed to not stick.

412 posted on 10/11/2005 10:46:00 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
"Here is a crazy thought ... hear what she has to say before you throw her under the bus or not"

Agree.

413 posted on 10/11/2005 10:46:08 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: gpapa
Oh goof grief


414 posted on 10/11/2005 10:46:19 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; Jim Robinson
No, it isn't out of the question.

Examine the link to the SF Chronicle op-ed I posted.

415 posted on 10/11/2005 10:46:46 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: decal
I thought that was the main reason the President made Ambassador Bolton a recess appointment - to set a precedent.

Bolton is done as UN Ambassador in January 2007 unless he gets confirmed before then. That's OK for a UN Ambassador (like I care much about that position!), but GWB's SCOTUS appointments can't expire with his Presidency -- or sooner. We don't want Hillary or some other 'Rat filling the O'Connor seat in January 2009!

416 posted on 10/11/2005 10:46:51 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (Lashed to the USS George W. Bush: "Damn the Torpedos, Full Miers Ahead!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Screw the list.
If Bush couldn't get anyone on it (which I find HIGHLY doubtful) then he should have drawn up another list.
Rick Santorum or John Cornyn would have been shoe-ins.
The Senate would have never rejected one of their own, and you certainly can't say there is any doubt over their qualifications of conservative credentials. Santorum would certainly fit "the mold of Scalia" that Bush promised us.


417 posted on 10/11/2005 10:47:12 PM PDT by counterpunch (Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: freedom4me

Paraphrasing Leno on Harriet Miers

So we're watching a little bit of the Jay Leno show tonight, and SCOTUS came up. Here, roughly, is one of the jokes:

So the rumor is that Bush is going to withdraw Harriet Miers's nomination, and put somebody in her place with more real courtroom experience. Her replacement will be Courtney Love.


418 posted on 10/11/2005 10:47:34 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decal

Imagine the howls if he recess appointed Janice Rogers Brown.


419 posted on 10/11/2005 10:47:50 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Better it come from the left than from the right.


420 posted on 10/11/2005 10:47:52 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 761-770 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson