Posted on 10/10/2005 12:30:18 PM PDT by neverdem
FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
The First Amendment has been getting a workout in recent weeks on two college campuses — the University of Florida and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill — where students are learning that free speech is a messy business.
The two cases, one involving a columnist at North Carolina and the other a political cartoonist at Florida, have inflamed minority groups — Muslims and black students, respectively — provoking protests and debate. That’s the good news insofar as protest and debate are the currency of free speech.
What’s not such good news is that the columnist was fired, while the Florida cartoonist has been condemned and threatened. Both students have been virtually abandoned by university officials, some of whom apparently are more concerned about burnishing their multiculti self-images than in demonstrating the importance of a founding principle that finds itself on increasingly shaky ground these days.
Exhibit A is Jillian Brandes, a former columnist for North Carolina’s The Daily Tar Heel. Her column, which was intended to make a case for racial profiling in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, began hyperbolically: “I want all Arabs to be stripped naked and cavity-searched if they get within 100 yards of an airport.”
Then she proceeded to quote several Arab students and a professor who said they wouldn’t mind being searched. Some of them subsequently claimed their remarks had been taken out of context, an unprecedented development in journalism history. Brandes was fired.
One could make a strong argument that Brandes’ column was silly, amateurish, lacking in taste, strident and ineffective. Being outrageous for the sake of outrage requires no special talent. Witness Howard Stern. But people have a clear and protected right to be both silly and amateurish.
Brandes’ editor claimed that he fired her for “journalistic malpractice,” for taking quotes out of context, not in response to pressure. Without contradicting him, I can only say that in 25 years with newspapers, I’ve never known anyone to be fired when a story’s subjects didn’t like the way quotes were used.
In Gainesville, Fla., where the First Amendment argument is more clear-cut, cartoonist Andy Marlette drew an image that has angered some black groups. Yes, a new generation has produced another Marlette. This one is the nephew of Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist and author, Doug Marlette, whose talent as an equal-opportunity offender apparently seeped into the family gene pool.
Marlette the younger’s cartoon in the Independent Florida Alligator was a commentary on rapper Kanye West’s remarks after Hurricane Katrina that: “George Bush doesn’t care about black people.” Marlette drew a cartoon of West holding an oversized playing card labeled “The Race Card,” with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice saying, “Nigga Please!”
The N-word makes me cringe . . . especially every time I hear Kanye West say it. His spicy songs, including his current hit, “Gold Digger,” are liberally seasoned with the word “nigga,” often couched in violence and obscenity. But when I imagine the immaculate and proper Condi Rice saying it, especially to a “brotha” who has made a fortune playing the bad boy, it makes me laugh.
Which is to say Marlette’s cartoon hit the mark. It was sophisticated, irreverent and funny. His use of West’s own language to parody the rapper’s political statement was, in fact, the art of the cartoon.
Yet, certain campus groups and administrators were outraged. This, despite the fact that the same student government that pulled ads from the Alligator is paying West to drop the n-bomb in concert at the university. Thus, Florida’s reputation as a party school unburdened by intellectual heavy-lifting remains intact. It’s hardly surprising that students don’t understand that the First Amendment that protects Marlette’s and Brandes’ right to voice unpopular opinions also protects West’s “music,” as well as their right to protest. A recent nationwide study by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education found that one of four college students couldn’t name any of the freedoms protected by the First Amendment.
It’s downright disturbing, however, when faculty and administrators’ understanding is little better. While some journalism professors have embraced the cartoon debate as a teaching opportunity, others — including school President Bernie Machen — have behaved like Church Ladies, pursing lips and wagging fingers instead of brandishing swords in defense of liberty.
The painful irony is that those minorities whose sensibilities have been offended are historically the first to suffer when free speech goes. Not so long ago, black people were lynched in this country for trying to voice their opinions at the polls.
Which is why African-Americans especially — and now Arab-Americans troubled by the specter of discrimination — should be the loudest voices in supporting the freedoms that permit even speech they find offensive.
It’s a messy job, but everybody’s got to do it.
©2005 Tribune Media Services
To reach Kathleen Parker, send e-mail to kparker@kparker.com.
© 2005 Kansas City Star
I was at U of Florida a few years ago when Marlette had a bunch of really anti-semitic cartoons. For me, seeing that really ended the myth that the left is "tolerant" of other ethnic groups.
I'm wondering, since that writer at UNC was fired for the stuff she printed, then why would her editors allow it to be printed to begin with? Seems it would've made more sense for them to not print her article than to let it through to the final draft, then fire her once the inevitable controversy flares up.
"But people have a clear and protected right to be both silly and amateurish"
Man, I hope so . . . 'silly and amateurish' describes most of my posts!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.