Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brownback critical of Miers
United Press International ^ | 10-9-2005 | Not Listed

Posted on 10/09/2005 8:50:05 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite

ASHINGTON, DC, United States (UPI) -- U.S. Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., Sunday criticized President Bush`s nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court but said the debate should be civil.

'Number one, a lot of us wanted to see somebody that was a well-formed jurist, so that they had a track record of what they would do in key cases coming in front of the court, and we could have a debate with the country and within the Senate about what this means,' said Brown back on CBS` 'Face the Nation.'

'Miers doesn`t have that track record, and doesn`t seem to be well-informed in her judicial philosophy having never been on the bench,' he said.

Brownback noted that some Supreme Court nominees appointed by Republican presidents turned to the left once they were confirmed. He said that was because they did not have 'well-formed' judicial philosophies.

'I think you`re seeing both of these at play (with the Miers nomination,' he said. 'One, not a clear philosophical position and, number two, the potential over time of veering to the left.'


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: 109th; angermagnetthread; brownback; cutoffnosesspiteface; fingerpoiningmatch; frcagematch; freepercivilwar; freepersmackdown; giantfrbashfest; harrietmiers; judicialjihad; miers; rabidshoutfest; scotus; snarlingdiscourse; weeatourown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

1 posted on 10/09/2005 8:50:08 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

I hope you are built of asbestos - bump -


2 posted on 10/09/2005 8:52:14 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Brownback's stock just rose in my book. Has George Allen commented on Meirs? Has Mike Pence?


3 posted on 10/09/2005 8:52:22 PM PDT by Bluegrass Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nerdgirl; Ol' Sparky; Map Kernow; Betaille; Pessimist; flashbunny; Itzlzha; Dont_Tread_On_Me_888; ..

Ping


4 posted on 10/09/2005 8:53:28 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite ( Mike Pence for President!!! http://acuf.org/issues/issue34/050415pol.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Senator Brownback just seriously wounded a kitten!


5 posted on 10/09/2005 8:54:17 PM PDT by flashbunny (Sorry, but I'm allergic to KoolAid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

This is my senator, I voted for him.


6 posted on 10/09/2005 8:54:39 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite ( Mike Pence for President!!! http://acuf.org/issues/issue34/050415pol.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Brownback's going to help sink this nomination. This guy is the real deal.


7 posted on 10/09/2005 8:56:23 PM PDT by Map Kernow ("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Sen. Brownback is obviously a sexist, elitist DUmmy troll. ;-)


8 posted on 10/09/2005 8:56:57 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Drudge just reported that 25 Republican Senators said they aren't yet convinced that she's worthy of being confirmed.


9 posted on 10/09/2005 8:57:03 PM PDT by Betaille ("And if the stars burn out there's only fire to blame" -Duran Duran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite
'Number one, a lot of us wanted to see somebody that was a well-formed jurist

Oh really? You mean like Souter, Ginzburg, Stevens or O'Conner Senator? Clarence Thomas doesn't qualify for the court under this criteria. Is he suppose to resign?

10 posted on 10/09/2005 8:58:52 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Professional Journalism- the Buggy Whip makers of the 21st century)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow
Brownback's going to help sink this nomination. This guy is the real deal.

Nah. He's playing to you guys.

He'll vote for her, especially if she does as well as she's likely to in the hearings.

"Sam who?" is not going to build his presidential aspirations on trashing a professional woman, is he?

11 posted on 10/09/2005 9:00:12 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Betaille

"Drudge just reported that 25 Republican Senators said they aren't yet convinced that she's worthy of being confirmed."

OMG, they're all Sexist and Elitist anti christian DUmmies right???


12 posted on 10/09/2005 9:00:36 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite ( Mike Pence for President!!! http://acuf.org/issues/issue34/050415pol.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Brownback that damn RINO!!!
LOL!


13 posted on 10/09/2005 9:00:38 PM PDT by counterpunch (Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Betaille
Drudge just reported that 25 Republican Senators said they aren't yet convinced that she's worthy of being confirmed.

That's what hearings are for. They're suckering you boys by getting your hopes up.

14 posted on 10/09/2005 9:01:50 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

""Sam who?" is not going to build his presidential aspirations on trashing a professional woman, is he?"

Nobody's trashing her. Everybody likes her personally. The issue is whether or not she has the qualifications and certainty of judicial philosophy to serve on the Supreme Court. All of the evidence says she does NOT.


15 posted on 10/09/2005 9:02:35 PM PDT by Betaille ("And if the stars burn out there's only fire to blame" -Duran Duran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

My god you sound like a 3 year old child, have a intellectual discourse or please shut it.


16 posted on 10/09/2005 9:02:46 PM PDT by aft_lizard (This space waiting for a post election epiphany it now is: Question Everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

"'Miers doesn`t have that track record, and doesn`t seem to be well-informed in her judicial philosophy having never been on the bench,' he said."

Wow, that's an understatement. Having never been a judge nor having ever ventured an opinion in writing (that has been made public) on any issues of concern to Bush's conservative base, I think it's fair to say she has no judicial philosopy.


17 posted on 10/09/2005 9:02:50 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Its safe to call this not a game of checkers but of Grand Master Chess. On Monday Specter took the podium claiming that a
potential maelstrom had been avoided by the appointment of Miers. After that Schumer spoke an said that the President was in a "box". Specters body language bespoke great confidence and a sense of personal triumph. Schumer's attitude was one of being still in the Majority. There was something humiliating in it all. Then as we watched the Presidents body language in presenting
Ms Miers, well let us say that he acted as though he did not want to be there or was not even there so was his lack of enthusiasm and pride in presentation. The question is whether this is real weakness or contrived weakness. In high stakes chess like this and with a climate and culture of declining trust in officials and in institutions righteous anger and mistrust is completely understandable.


18 posted on 10/09/2005 9:03:39 PM PDT by NixonsAngryGhost (WARNING- Arlen Specters Brain is Radioactive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
He'll vote for her, especially if she does as well as she's likely to in the hearings.

Well I wasn't too impressed by her reading of the acceptance speech written for her. She didn't sound like someone who believed the words coming out of her mouth... or knew what the next ones would be.
19 posted on 10/09/2005 9:03:51 PM PDT by counterpunch (Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
"Sam who?" is not going to build his presidential aspirations on trashing a professional woman, is he?

No, that would be "sexist." And one thing the "base" will not tolerate is deviation from strict gender equity---a principle Harriet Miers is a "reliable vote" for. You're right---I acknowledge it, 'spur. Take it to the bank. Guess "Justice Miers" it is. *SIGH!*

20 posted on 10/09/2005 9:04:23 PM PDT by Map Kernow ("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson