Posted on 10/09/2005 5:13:45 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
Sunday, October 9th, 2005
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.; former House Speaker Newt Gingrich; Texas Supreme Court Judge Nathan Hecht; Gary Bauer, president of the American Values Coalition; Dr. Steven Rosenberg, chief surgeon with the National Institutes of Health.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Pat Buchanan, former presidential candidate; Richard Land, president, Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sens. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., and Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Sens. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., ranking Democrat of the committee; Mike Leavitt, secretary, Health and Human Services.
LATE EDITION (CNN) : Sens. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Richard Durbin, D-Ill.; Mowaffak al-Rubaie, Iraqi national security adviser; the Rev. Pat Robertson, founder of the Christian Coalition; Dr. David Nabarro, U.N. bird flu envoy.
The DUmocrat bobble heads are hammering on Miers, but ignore terror threats. No bias there, right?
You are incorrect, from what I have read, I like Roberts. But I did not form my opinions from his performance in front of the committee. And his answers were scripted. He was well prepared and his delivery (performance) was well rehearsed.
Today was just another stage to fall off of for the runt.
I agree with you on many events FNC has covered lately, but not the election. FOX was the first to stop the hype once they realized they were being duped. Hume gave credit to their research people who were telling them the hype had to be wrong and to not believe the exit polling, if I remember it correctly.
Thank you for your kind words. As Richard Viguerie says (paraphrasing):"We've been waiting 40 years for this. Why not someone who's got the track record and experience?"
FEDERALIST No. 76 Tuesday, April 1, 1788
Graham just won a LOT of respect back with me for that. NOT telling people to support her just cause she is "Bush's choice" AM saying they should find OUT something about her before they go freaking out. So far they are freaking cause they WANT to be freaked, NOT because they have any real legitimate concerns. They want to scream "what if she is a SOUTER." Yeah, what if she is a Thomas? That was ALSO a Bush SR pick. Funny how so many "Conservative" Pundits forget that.
No, I don't watch "This Week." I would be interested in knowing what she said.
**snort**...yeah, what does the SCOTUS need with a woman who specializes in Constitutional law, anyway?
Buchanan is so passe and irrelevant that he will take any opportunity to get on TV and gladly follow the Rat MSM script to bash true conservatives. My only hope is that Kristol soon follows him to the realm of irrelevancy.
**snort**...yeah, what does the SCOTUS need with a woman who specializes in Constitutional law, anyway?
Buchanan is so passe and irrelevant that he will take any opportunity to get on TV and gladly follow the Rat MSM script to bash true conservatives. My only hope is that Kristol soon follows him to the realm of irrelevancy.
Me too. My problem with Levin is always he is too much a Lawyer. He keeps telling people to "Let me finish" then talks the whole segment. Anyone he is on with spends the whole time being accused of things with no chance to response. He does not want to debate, he wants to fillibuster. Real turn off.
Aren't politicians insecure by nature? They seek public acceptance, which is why they lie to your face....tell everyone what they want to hear. Not very many have the courage of their convictions.
I do NOT put W in that category.
Thanks for that info.
When a person speaks publicly, goes on the record so to speak, we know where they stand. And some will stand with that person and some against that person.
But that isn't what's happening. What's happening is a pattern that's associated with a highly manipulative person is emerging. People are told what they want to hear, privately. Privately.
Every person so far who knows Harriet Miers has had an almost identical reaction - smugness. The Cheshire cat look ... they know she'll be great. And why the smugness? She agrees with them. Each and every one of them. Even when they don't agree with each other...
Your dad is right. Isolationism is just one of the paleo-con positions. It's in addition to a militant nationalism mindset and why so many US conservatives reject Buchanan today.
Isn't it amazing all these Anti-Miers types keep saying "But what if she is a...." Yeah, and what if she is NOT? Funny how all the "Conservative" pundits want to impose their OWN litmus test after spending the last 3 decades whining about the Dems doing that. Maybe we should actually find OUT somethings before freaking out.
Bush is President for three more years. It's hard to believe he won't get at least one more swing at bat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.