Skip to comments.
Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 9 October 2005
Various big media television networks ^
| 9 October 2005
| Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces
Posted on 10/09/2005 5:13:45 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 1,041-1,050 next last
To: All
Did someone catch when the full Scalia interview will be broadcast and on which cable network?
101
posted on
10/09/2005 6:38:46 AM PDT
by
Racehorse
(Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.)
To: Morgan in Denver
Thanks Morgan.
Desperately searching for a cold front down here, 80/90,90/80 getting old. My a/c bill went up $100. last month.
102
posted on
10/09/2005 6:39:06 AM PDT
by
rodguy911
(Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU and all Mosques in the US,UK.)
To: MNJohnnie
You pretty said what I have been thinking. If it was so great that the current SC had so much experience on the bench when they were first appointed, how come we ended up with such a stupid decision on the eminent domain Kelo case?
Change is not always a bad thing.
103
posted on
10/09/2005 6:40:57 AM PDT
by
CAluvdubya
("You are stuck on stupid!". Gen. Honore 9-20-05)
To: Bahbah
I think it will be sooooo appropriate.
104
posted on
10/09/2005 6:41:39 AM PDT
by
mathluv
To: Alas Babylon!
So now who do they blame for "Allah's Wrath" regarding this earthquake? You know they have an answer to that. It's because Pakistan is cooperating with us in the WOT. Never mind that the area hardest hit is the tribal stronghold region helping Al Qaeda. If anything that's punishment for not having driven us out of the Uma yet.
105
posted on
10/09/2005 6:41:58 AM PDT
by
Phsstpok
(There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
To: Bahbah
I think Hillary is going to allow as much of her dirt to be blown about now & denied (60minutes & the WAPO article in one week!!) so when it is raised in 08 she can say that was all investigated and settled in 05.
106
posted on
10/09/2005 6:42:08 AM PDT
by
chgomac
To: Alas Babylon!
Gary Bauer made the most sense this morning of anyone so far.
![](http://rds.yahoo.com/S=96062883/K=gary+bauer/v=2/SID=e/TID=I001_70/l=IVI/SIG=12knf1cf3/EXP=1128951591/*http%3A//www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/01/04/bauer/bauer.jpg)
He is staunchly opposed to Miers, and this is more bad news for this awful nomination. Add his name to George Will, Robert Bork, William Kristol, Michelle Malkin, Charles Krauthammer, Byron York, Ann Coulter, and Pat Buchanan in the list who oppose Miers.
This nomination was a colossal mistake. Karl Rove was too clever by half with this Hail Mary pass.
To: Seattle Conservative
Did you hear? 60 Minutes will have rebuttal from Sandy Berger to counter Freeh. Gee, a convicted liar and thief versus the past head of the FBI. Wonder who will have the most credibility? /sarcasm
To: Racehorse
Yes.
A year from now the opinion will be one of two possibilities:
1. Miers is the grandest conservative JC in history, or
2. Miers makes Ginsberg look conservative.
A year from now is too late. When a President appoints a Judge, he doesn't get a do-over. Appointing a Judge is not like appointing a cabinet member or department head. That cabinet member or department head can be replaced if they don't follow the intent of the President. A Judge cannot be; that justice is there for life. That is why the conservative base is so upset. They want a known quantity, not some stealth (hidden, invisible) unknown quantity.
109
posted on
10/09/2005 6:42:19 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: txradioguy
Does anyone remember what Tim Russert said regarding a quote Buchanon had had about Justice Souter? Buchanon said back then 'that Souter was a great cadidate?' And Buchanon is out there tearing apart Bush and Miers after that? What a hyporcit....I am really beginning to hate Buchanon.
110
posted on
10/09/2005 6:43:26 AM PDT
by
Fawn
(Try Not----Do or Do not ~~ Yoda)
To: CAluvdubya
Sandy may be wearing the complete outfit of orange coveralls if he is convicted of violating his probation.
111
posted on
10/09/2005 6:43:55 AM PDT
by
mathluv
To: mathluv
You mean Sandy "A J Foyt"(I can drive 88 and stick nat. archive docs in my pants if I want)the burglar. I heard he has to go up in front of the same judge who originally basically let him off. Might get interesting.
112
posted on
10/09/2005 6:44:06 AM PDT
by
rodguy911
(Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU and all Mosques in the US,UK.)
To: TomGuy
You are correct but the person appointing them must have a fair idea of how that person will react under given circumstances.
Everyone is an individual no 2 conservatives will agree 100 per cent of the time on each issue. I am sure that GWB is confident that she is a true conservative and she will adhere to the Constitution/accepted law and will not legislate from the bench and therefore will agree with the majority of conservative the majority of the time.
I am sure there will be times where her vote may not be the same as you or I or others wish on varied topics but her the overall philosophy is what is important.
NO TWO PEOPLE WILL AGREE OR VOTE THE SAME 100 PER CENT OF THE TIME
113
posted on
10/09/2005 6:45:38 AM PDT
by
snugs
(An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
To: MNJohnnie
"Looking at what she has said and done rather then listing to the very shifting reasons put out by the Whaa! Chorus is what is changing my mind."
Wow! Talk about a concept the Beltway gang and the MSM have forgotten how to do.
I think you're on to something.
IMHO for too long the Republicans have fretted too much about whether their candidates stance on Roe was going to cause a big dustup in Congress and the MSM and get their candidate "Borked", and ended up sending up "safe" nominees The Rats knew this and have used it like Barry Bonds bat on a hanging curve.
The President nominating Ms. Meiers could just be W's way of giving all those weak sisters the finger.
I think CJ Roberts and Ms. Meiers are going to bring some needed changes to the SCOTUS.
114
posted on
10/09/2005 6:45:48 AM PDT
by
txradioguy
(In Memory Of My Friend 1SG Tim Millsap A Co. 70th Eng. K.I.A. 25 April 2005)
To: Fawn
Yeah Buchanon has become such an isolationist he's cut himself off from reality.
115
posted on
10/09/2005 6:47:53 AM PDT
by
txradioguy
(In Memory Of My Friend 1SG Tim Millsap A Co. 70th Eng. K.I.A. 25 April 2005)
To: TomGuy
Bush just doesn't seem to want the fightMaybe the President thinks adding Harriet Miers to the USSC would be a good idea.
116
posted on
10/09/2005 6:48:21 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(OCTOBER 9, 1973. Nixon insistance on US airlift which saved Israel during Yom Kippur War.)
To: MNJohnnie
Best minds or best schools are all subjective. Nominees we know have good minds for the court are unacceptable to the left for the same reason. In their mind, anyway.
To: rodguy911
Mort Kondroke mentioned this on Hugh's show. He talked to a conservative senator & he says - We knew Ginsberg is extreme liberal, voted 96/3. How can we deny Miers who President says shares his view? How can we expect her to be worse than Ginsberg who we voted for 96/3?
118
posted on
10/09/2005 6:49:26 AM PDT
by
anita
To: anita
MSNBC question for viewers should be:
Should soldiers be riding bikes that are not uparmored?
119
posted on
10/09/2005 6:49:42 AM PDT
by
maica
(We are fighting the War for the Free World --Frank Gaffney)
To: maryz
Freeh may have a deal with 60 Minutes for delaying so they can be first. Look for Freeh next week after the fact.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 1,041-1,050 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson