Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Sorry for any bad grammar or punctuation problems, just frustrated is all.
1 posted on 10/06/2005 6:44:18 PM PDT by aft_lizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: aft_lizard

I would have prefered Brown or Luttig but I'm accepting Mier without much fight.


2 posted on 10/06/2005 6:47:05 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard

just frustrated is all.



Don't worry, it's all part of "THE PLAN".

Democrats will roue the day she was nominated.

Yes, they are laughting at us, but in the end, it is
we who will be laughing at their disarray.


3 posted on 10/06/2005 6:48:17 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard

She may very well turn out to be an excellent strict constitutionalist, but I am not prepared to gamble on it. I have been screwed too many times by politicians who said, "Trust me". Why make a pick that will get 85 votes that no one really knows? Why not pick someone who has an established record and will get 51 votes?


4 posted on 10/06/2005 6:48:28 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard

For many of us, there's no point in arguing, because this is a done deal. But speaking for myself, I'm just sore because there were others far more qualified who could have been picked. At this moment in history, picking from the bottom of the batting order is not wise.

Still though, Stevens might not last 3 more years, so there might still be a chance for redemption.


5 posted on 10/06/2005 6:49:22 PM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard

I didn't notice there was a poll but I wouldn't know how to respond anyway. Would I rather it were someone else? Yes. Would I be despondent if she were defeated? No. Am I going to pout and hope the Republicans loose until they beg forgiveness if she wins. No.


6 posted on 10/06/2005 6:50:10 PM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard

The other side might be laughing at us, but it's laughter that means nothing, and serves to demonstrate their ignorance and incivility.
We are debating. That's a good thing. We are not in lockstep. That's a good thing. We are approching the question from many different points. That's a good thing.
If the other side were reasonably intelligent, they'd see that we have a healthy relationship. They are united by hate. We're united by truth. It's easy to hate. Getting to the truth takes a little longer.


8 posted on 10/06/2005 6:52:19 PM PDT by wolfpat (Congress is the only whorehouse in America that loses money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard

Good title.

I must admit I don't think I've seen Freepers quite this divided over what theoretically should have been "one of our own".

I am hoping some key Republican senators will ask her to step down before the hearings, but it's not likely.


9 posted on 10/06/2005 6:52:47 PM PDT by nerdgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard
Frustration here too, but not at the nomination. The normal Knee jerk reactions we usually accuse the left of, we have been quite guilty of.

And a majority in the Senate does not equate to a majority of conservatives.

10 posted on 10/06/2005 6:52:51 PM PDT by SouthTexas (Just say NO to New Orleans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard
....and if there is one thing I hate ,and thats to be laughed at by commies.

Something about that 'picture' just made me laugh and I swear, I'm not a commie. I just can't picture Joe Stalin laughing. He had no sense of humor whatsoever.

11 posted on 10/06/2005 6:53:40 PM PDT by Cagey (There are more planes in the ocean than submarines in the sky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard

I had similar sentiments on a thread yesterday evening. I basically stated that I wasn't going to object to her nomination any more. I don't like it, I don't think it's the best choice that could have been made, but for the sake of unity, I'll go along with the President's choice.


12 posted on 10/06/2005 6:54:02 PM PDT by birbear (Admit it. you clicked on the "I have already previewed" button without actually previewing the post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard

The only thing that's going to fix FR is for a democrat to win the next election. If a Republican wins we'll continue to eat our own until we're too fractured to be useful. We're doing that already, and have been for some time.


14 posted on 10/06/2005 6:54:20 PM PDT by Ramius (Buy blades for war fighters: freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net --> 900 knives and counting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard
but her simple nomination has torn the base apart.

No, it has not.

The base is fine; it's the usual suspects, The Malcontents and The Unappeasables, who are having a fit.

15 posted on 10/06/2005 6:55:32 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard; Rodney King

and the vanities just keep on coming

was this the Rodney King issue

don't anyone criticize "my president" ya hear me...lol



16 posted on 10/06/2005 6:55:59 PM PDT by wardaddy (i'm all outta bot i can't live without you,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard
I had been on that last thread that precipitated your vanity. That was the only time I have asked the mods to pull a whole thread because of the stuff going on. I still do not have enough info to make a rational decision on Harriet and I am not the type to be browbeaten into acting one way or the other. I will continue to glean info from articles, but, I definitely will not participate in a thread where hysteria is the order of the day.
17 posted on 10/06/2005 6:56:10 PM PDT by crazyhorse691 (Diplomacy doesn't work when seagulls rain on your parade. A shotgun and umbrella does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard
I personally feel that she would make a fine Justice, but her simple nomination has torn the base apart. I think it would do us and the RNC good if we all united against her

Hope you are as gullible as the Senate Democrats... if this splits the Conservative base, then the Rats will love her... or have I said to much???

18 posted on 10/06/2005 6:57:19 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard
"But if a movement is to survive it has to have a secure foundation, and right now I see the foundation rumbling as if to fracture."

What is the foundation? SOunds like you're arguing for robots. Remember Islam means submission.

19 posted on 10/06/2005 6:57:24 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard
All this fuss, fuss, fuss over Harriet Miers. She seems like a decent enough woman. I probably wouldn't marry her but I think she'd make an excellent librarian, schoolteacher or Supreme Court Justice.

What's all the fuss? The qualifications for Supreme Court Justice should not be that unobtainable for the vast majority of U.S. citizens. All that matters is that you have a clear mind and a good understanding of the U.S. Constitution.

So this Harriet Miers should fit the bill just fine. So she's 60 years old. What's the big deal? She's a young 60 years old. She's got 20 years in the tank, easy. She probably goes to bed at night just like any other woman. She probably dreams and she probably dreams about what it would be like to be in an airplane that is crashing. Then she wakes up and all is well again.

I think there is to much ado about Harriet Miers.

21 posted on 10/06/2005 6:57:48 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (What Would Howard Roarke Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard; Jim Robinson

Hopefully Jim will run that survey shortly after or even during the hearings. We will have a much better handle on things.

Right now, I figure that if I can't say something nice, I shouldn't say anything at all.


23 posted on 10/06/2005 6:58:52 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard

People that post vanities should be charged $50 each time.


25 posted on 10/06/2005 6:59:25 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard
It wasn't the person, it was the fight that I wanted. I have little doubt that Ms. Meirs is a conservative of some sort. The problem is, that we don't know, and we would hope that the answer will be reveiled during the "process".

I just wanted the fight, to drive more nails in the libs coffin. I have been waging this war since Goldwater, and I want it finished. We had a chance to do that, but the President choose to weasle out. I hope he had an ulterior motive that is temporarily lost to us vartlets. If not, and Ms. Miers is confirmed and she turns into a Souder, I am basically screwed, for she will be there until I am gone....I will never know what it is like to live under a SOCTUS that does not make us live by its law. Worse, you younger people will have to live with it.

I wanted the fight....not tomorrow, not next week, but now. Sigh...

26 posted on 10/06/2005 6:59:47 PM PDT by B.O. Plenty (Islam and liberalism are terminal..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson