Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miers Said to Be Unfazed by Criticism
AP ^ | October 6, 2005 | AP

Posted on 10/06/2005 5:17:35 PM PDT by freedomdefender

Harriet Miers is unfazed by the criticism and questioning of her qualifications as she seeks to become the next Supreme Court justice, a longtime friend said Thursday.

"She's excited. She's working hard at it. The criticism, I think, is rolling off her back as it usually does," said Justice Nathan Hecht of the Texas Supreme Court.

Hecht, who has known Miers for 30 years, said he has visited her several times since she was nominated by President Bush on Monday.

A new poll indicates people are uncertain about Miers. In an AP-Ipsos poll taken this week, two thirds of those surveyed didn't know enough about Miers to have an opinion of her. Just 41 percent said the Senate should confirm her, lower than similar ratings for Roberts after his nomination; 27 percent said she should not be confirmed and 32 percent weren't sure.

The White House said that former Indiana Republican Sen. Dan Coats, who has most recently served as ambassador to Germany, will serve as Miers' escort through the confirmation process, much as former Sen. Fred Thompson did for Chief Justice John Roberts.

"Senator Coats will be working closely with the nominee and serving as a public advocate for her," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said. "He will help advise her throughout the process. Senator Coats' role will be to attend meetings with senators on Harriet's courtesy visits."

The choice of Miers, a veteran lawyer and White House aide who has never been a judge _ and therefore has no record of judicial decisions _ has worried some Republican senators, anti-abortion activists and others who question the depth of her conservative views. Democrats, meanwhile, worry that she will prove too conservative.

"I don't have any doubt that she'll be conservative," Hecht said in an interview on NBC"s "Today" show. "Whether she'll move the court to the right I don't know."

Hecht said he was confident that Miers is "pro-life" but can't predict whether she would vote to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion.

Miers' commitment to her evangelical church in Dallas "shapes the kind of person that she is," Hecht said. "It doesn't shape her view on cases. In fact, almost the opposite."

"Someone who is very committed to their faith is also going to be committed to the oath that they take as a judge, and is going to judge cases fairly and is not going to let personal or religious views or any other kind of views influence the decisions in actual cases," he told CBS' "The Early Show."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: harrietmiers; miers; passthekoolaid; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Reactionary

You think so? Interesting. I don't.


41 posted on 10/06/2005 7:12:56 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary

You think so? Interesting. I don't.


42 posted on 10/06/2005 7:13:02 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chicha Kazembe

"The President does not agree with you. He wins." The country loses.


43 posted on 10/06/2005 7:19:08 PM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

Yep, and anyone poking a stick at her might find her biting back. (Doesn't Texas have a lot of rattlesnakes?)

I think she should be given a chance to answer the questions before anyone judges her to be lacking.


44 posted on 10/06/2005 7:23:27 PM PDT by Goodgirlinred ( GoodGirlInRed Four More Years!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: d2e

I disagree. From all of that I find the meaning to be that she is fair, intelligent, and unbiased. She will vote on the facts and applicable law.


45 posted on 10/06/2005 7:25:26 PM PDT by Goodgirlinred ( GoodGirlInRed Four More Years!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

I would have thought that she would need that knowledge to be in the job she presently has. What makes you think attorneys don't know the Constitution?


46 posted on 10/06/2005 7:27:00 PM PDT by Goodgirlinred ( GoodGirlInRed Four More Years!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: loveliberty2

Amen. Those who think she should have had experience as a judge should remember all of the threads we have had against judges!


47 posted on 10/06/2005 7:31:53 PM PDT by Goodgirlinred ( GoodGirlInRed Four More Years!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: lawdude; Pharmboy

Most USSC appointees over the past 100 years have not been judges.


48 posted on 10/06/2005 8:30:04 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Huck
" Actually, I really am starting to think both parties are in this together. I think we're the suckers."

Patience grasshopper.

Perhaps some strategery will unfold.

Miers gets voted down and the dims worst nightmare gets the nod

49 posted on 10/06/2005 8:41:31 PM PDT by spokeshave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary
Oh. But the lunatic Ruth Bader Ginsburg has the judicial bonafides.

Not only that, but they are effectively lobbying for Sandra Day O'Connor to remain on the court indefinitely.

Not that all of them even realize it

50 posted on 10/06/2005 8:44:22 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave
Miers gets voted down and the dims worst nightmare gets the nod

Sandra Day O'Connor is not the Democrats worst nightmare.

51 posted on 10/06/2005 8:45:02 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Goodgirlinred
Amen. Those who think she should have had experience as a judge should remember all of the threads we have had against judges!

They are filled with hatred for her. I wonder if they hated Clarence Thomas when he was nominated.

52 posted on 10/06/2005 8:46:07 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: d2e
An evangelical Christian

I think this is what really bothers alot of the critics ...

53 posted on 10/06/2005 8:48:20 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: digger48
Did I read somewhere that something like 30% of all SC Justices have not been judges?

Less than 50% has been judges.

54 posted on 10/06/2005 8:54:11 PM PDT by Cold Heat (This is not sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat

Has=Have LOL


55 posted on 10/06/2005 8:55:02 PM PDT by Cold Heat (This is not sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

Why do you think that they are filled with hatred for her?


56 posted on 10/06/2005 9:16:55 PM PDT by Goodgirlinred ( GoodGirlInRed Four More Years!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
"And we all may lose."

I do not understand why you write that. The President knows this woman and thinks she will be a fine justice. You do not know her, yet you are all doom and gloom. She will be confirmed, regardless of all the bitc*ing by conservatives. All the hysteria does is weaken the President and the conservative movement. If Miers turns out to not be the sort of Justice that we want, I will join you in complaining, but let's wait until after she has made a few rulings before we go off half-cocked.
57 posted on 10/07/2005 3:13:20 AM PDT by Chicha Kazembe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Huck
"I'm calling a moratorium on Miers/Bush/GOP bashing--but it won't be easy"

Better late than never. While discussing concerns and disappointments is understandable, bashing is obviously counterproductive.
58 posted on 10/07/2005 3:16:22 AM PDT by Chicha Kazembe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
I think this is what really bothers alot of the critics ...

Really? I assumed that hiding behind the cross served to mollify potential critics.

59 posted on 10/07/2005 3:17:29 AM PDT by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Chicha Kazembe

Then again, sometimes tantrums are unavoidable. He had it coming, but I've moved on.


60 posted on 10/07/2005 3:40:11 AM PDT by Huck ("I'm calling a moratorium on Miers/Bush/GOP bashing--but it won't be easy (thanks tex))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson