Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Levin and Dick Morris get into it
WABC radio | October 5, 2005 | Self

Posted on 10/05/2005 12:57:14 PM PDT by jmaroneps37

Mark Levin and Dick morris have just debated the nomination on Sean hannity's show. After listening to Levin, I am more convinced that Miers is the one I want. Levin talks a good game about not wanting judges who will re write the Constitution. We we have a person that all indications show will be an orginalist. I think Levin is more interested in a fight than actually getting the judical "No" machine we need in the Suprems Court. I think Miers will be a solid money in the bank conservative vote. Since Supreme Court Judges only get one vote, how much more could Miers do? Maybe smack Ginsberg in the chops?


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dickmorris; hannity; levin; marklevin; morris; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-308 next last
To: oceanview

"Levin is an expert on these matters."

Yeah, he was part of the crew that gave us O'Connor and Kennedy. Thanks, Mark!


41 posted on 10/05/2005 1:18:14 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
Harriet Miers is a coin toss. That's not what I want in a Supreme Court nominee.

Bingo....This should never have been a questionable decision amongst the base (if the base was even really considered).

I have my doubts, big time.

42 posted on 10/05/2005 1:18:53 PM PDT by add925 (The Left = Xenophobes in Denial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
If that is all it takes to be an SCJC, we apparently don't expect much.

Honest question, for anyone who might know and answer while I google it myself. I didn't know til the other day that Rehnquist had never been a judge before the SC. What qualifications did he bring with him?

43 posted on 10/05/2005 1:18:59 PM PDT by agrace (Where were you when I founded the earth? Tell me if you know so much. Job 38:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

But, jeez Louise, shouldn't a nominee to the Supreme Court at least have merits?


44 posted on 10/05/2005 1:19:10 PM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: svcw

I'm just saying what I've seemed to have noticed. Most people I've seen here are hugely disappointed in the pick.


45 posted on 10/05/2005 1:19:17 PM PDT by pcottraux (It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
Get real.
Read what she has done and said.
Harry Reid is going to regrets his support.
46 posted on 10/05/2005 1:19:32 PM PDT by svcw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Good one!


47 posted on 10/05/2005 1:19:57 PM PDT by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his countary" - George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Levin sounded like a total whining idiot. I am no fan of Dick "toe sucker" Moris but Levin just kept interupting and made on sense.


48 posted on 10/05/2005 1:20:11 PM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
Don't be fooled, it's just that the "Donner party" is one helluva lot noisier right now.

That is a good one ( and so true) still laughing. :)

49 posted on 10/05/2005 1:20:24 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

I am starting to believe the LEFT wanted a fight more than the conservatives.

Sun Tzu was right. Never fight a battle when you can take the field without the battle.


50 posted on 10/05/2005 1:20:34 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

geez- could there EVER have been a name better made for instant satire than Ruth Buzzi Ginsberg


51 posted on 10/05/2005 1:20:39 PM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pcottraux

Disappointed is much different than hate her.


52 posted on 10/05/2005 1:20:46 PM PDT by svcw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Yeah, right; that's why when he vetted Kennedy, we wound up with him on the SCOTUS, I suppose.


53 posted on 10/05/2005 1:20:51 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
Levin is an expert on these matters. he knows the machinations of the court, he understands and can explain why so many republican appointments drift left once they get there.

I read a theory the other day that Tony Snow and Mark Levin are going overboard on their dislike of the Miers nomination because Snow really went to bat for Souter while working for the Bush41 term and got screwed and Levin went to bat for Kennedy and got burned.

I don't know if Levin's arguments are from his knowledge of the mechanisms of the court or the fact that he is skitish on trusting an unknown again
54 posted on 10/05/2005 1:21:13 PM PDT by Republican Red (''Van der Sloot" is Dutch for ''Kennedy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

"I've seen very precious little evidence she's an originalist."

have you seen any evidence that would cause you to assume she's not?


55 posted on 10/05/2005 1:21:40 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
The notion that Miers is an "originalist" is pure spin. As is the notion, popularized by Bush at his presser yesterday, that she was the most qualified available candidate for the High Court.

Risible. Absolutely risible.

Be Seeing you.

Chris

56 posted on 10/05/2005 1:21:55 PM PDT by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "Jesus is Coming. Everybody look busy...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Okay, you got me. Pardon my strong wording.


57 posted on 10/05/2005 1:22:11 PM PDT by pcottraux (It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Kennedy lied during the vetting process. what you are saying is that a person with LESS of a record to be vetted, is a less risky choice. no way.


58 posted on 10/05/2005 1:22:37 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: agrace

"What qualifications did he bring with him?"

16 years of private practice in AZ and 3 years in the Nixon Administration. And that was it.


59 posted on 10/05/2005 1:22:59 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

"Yeah, he was part of the crew that gave us O'Connor and Kennedy. Thanks, Mark!"

I have a tremendous ammount of repect from Levin, that being said he was the one responsible for vetting Kennedy.


60 posted on 10/05/2005 1:23:20 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-308 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson