Posted on 10/03/2005 8:38:48 AM PDT by Millee
It's evil, pure and simple. Equalty has just gained new purpose: everyone must become 'equally' diseased.
>>>>>Croome argued in a statement that countries like Spain, Switzerland and Italy have lifted prohibitions on accepting blood donations from homosexuals.
This is troubling. Is there anytype of ban that has been issued to these countries in reference to pharmaceutical imports?
Research facilities and pharm companies purchase specimens, blood and tissues etc.
Will this taint imports? It has been an issue before.
Tainted blood deals raise international furor
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/889385/posts
Blood banks test for HIV anyway - gay or not - so just saying "no" to the question does not guarantee that your blood will be used. Positive HIV and your blood is tossed - then your name goes on a thanks but no thanks list.
Wow, that's frightening. Isn't anyone paying attention over there?
Sure. People on prescriptions, for example. Or who have had hepatitis, or herpes of some kind. Any number of conditions.
Maybe they should just accept it, then destroy it.
Well, I agree part of the way, but I believe there is a "in utero" deficiency that leaves some people "weak" in their primary sexuality. These are the ones that can be pushed over the line by mistreatment or recruitment. That is why I hold out that someday prospective moms will have a pill that boosts their children's normal sexuality so that they are not available for the homosexual population to drool over.
And you are right about trauma and abuse. This crime is considered way too gently by our courts and population. It should be one of the worst offenses one can commit. Heres hoping the incidence of this perversion will in fact decrease.
I'm not prejudiced against gays, but I am prejudiced against self destructive political correctness which may lead to more deaths from a tainted blood supply.
True or False: There is a higher incidence of HIV/AIDS in the gay population.
True or False: If there is a higher incidence of HIV/AIDS in the gay population, then admitting gay blood donations into the blood supply will increase the likelihood of blood containing HIV.
True or False: If there is an increase in HIV in the blood supply, more people receiving transfusions will be infected with HIV.
True or False: If HIV/AIDS is fatal in many cases, people infected with HIV from blood transfusions will die.
True or False: This freakin' world is going insane.
G-d save us all from the fatal idiocy of PC.
"At this point I felt that I was being personally violated in a way."
Sometimes the jokes just write themselves, lol!
we'll just have to disagree on this one. There is no non-debunked study that has ever found a biological link to this mental disease
I give blood regularly.....
I hope I don't need to be given blood, but I sure as hell don't want a group of people giving blood that are absolutely prone to blood borne diseases some of which we don't know about yet....
there are many gay men who unfortunately want to pretend they are normal when they are not.....they are an abnormal human developement ...that does not make them evil or necessarily sinful....but it does make them prime disease carriers...IMO
therefore, money and time are being wasted on a group that is not going to pass muster a great deal of the time....
gee...they don't even want you if you travel to AFrica much or if you have the sniffles....
but being a anal-fixated individual in a community devastated by HIV I guess is acceptable.....NOT!!!!!
Its not that much a disagreement, we know its not genetic, identical twins can split on the issue. As far as the in utero, I saw it on a study, that maybe at a particular time in development there is not enough of some nutrient. This is not any different than trauma to the developing child. The time frame would be short enough to explain the frequency of the homosexual in the population as a whole. And would also explain the homosexual without any known abuse or abnormal parenting.
You can be sure that determination of the cause of homosexuality will not be as exciting to the left as it will be to the right. In fact, looking for such a cause is probably very non-pc. But I don't care. Take care.
me 2
Amazing. There is an "anal sadistic" side to those who feel they must sue over this.
I think the Red Cross and authorities in France have been sued because they were not diligent enough to keep high risk blood out of the system in the early discovery of AIDS/HIV. It would be their suicide to bow down to this nonsense.
OMG. This cannot be allowed to happen anywhere, and we all know why.
In June of this year, a large study was released where they asked gay men in various cities to volunteer to get tested for HIV. The researchers found the gay men in places where gay men can be found (gay bars, baths, bookstores, gay pride events). They tested 2500 men. Turns out 25% had HIV but only half of these knew they had it.
Studies involving identical male twins find that if the one twin is gay, the probability that the other twin is gay is 38% (if I remember correctly). This doesn't sound like much until you realize that only 2-4% of the male population is homosexual: so the probability that the identical twin of a gay man is gay is ten or more times more greater than normal. The same number for left-handedness is only 1.5 times more likely (8% of the male population is left-handed, and if a left-handed man has an identical twin, the twin has a 12% chance of being left-handed).
But of course, even though there appears to be a strong genetic component to homosexuality, it is certain that it doesn't cause homosexuality, it only increases the odds.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.