Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harriet Miers the pick AP

Posted on 10/03/2005 4:06:25 AM PDT by johnmecainrino

Harriet Miers


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; evangelical; harrietmiers; prolife; putin; rino; scotus; winwin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 2,941-2,944 next last
To: section9
This is SOOOO DEPRESSING!!!!!!

When historians review our era they will conclude that today was the day on which Reaganism died. It's over everybody, as over as the Anticommunist movement was over when McCarthy's Army hearings collapsed in infamy. We will now have to endure Hillary as the clone of JFK, an Edwards instead of LBJ. Who will be our Nixon in 2020? Indeed, Marx was right: history repeats itself, first as tragedy and then as farce. What depressing thoughts.
861 posted on 10/03/2005 6:19:59 AM PDT by irish_links
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 793 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

in 1987 & 1988. And Reagan used to vote Democrat too. What does this have to do with the price of tea in China. She's been straight Rep ever since.

I agree. So was Laura Bush at one time. Some on here are lou lous.


862 posted on 10/03/2005 6:20:05 AM PDT by TTRR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RightthinkinAmerican
Some weak-kneed Freepers are getting their morning excercise with all their jumping to conclusions.

More like bouncing off rubber room walls, IMO.

863 posted on 10/03/2005 6:20:06 AM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 834 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520
This is just unacceptable! How can you pass up Luttig, Brown, Jones or even Owen for Hariet F%*#'n Miers

Incredible isn't it?

We give the GOP control of the Executive and Legislative branches of government, yet the Democrats are still in charge.

To all you Miers-lets-wait-and-see apologists: Why should we settle for unknowns when there is greatness to choose from?

864 posted on 10/03/2005 6:20:09 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 783 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident; nicmarlo

She states that she is a strict Constitutionalist. President Bush has steadfastly maintained that is what he is looking for in his nominees.

That seems to be more than those who don't believe she is seem to be hanging their hat on.


865 posted on 10/03/2005 6:20:34 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 619 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette
There is nothing automatically suspect about a lawyer clerking for a Democrat judge. We are talking the law, not politics, when we talk about such matters.

There's certainly nothing positive, though. One of Roberts' strengths was that he clerked for Rehnquist; clearly the same principle applies.

Further, some post that she donated to Gore. But that was in 1988 when he was avowedly pro-life. As for donating to Lloyd Bentsen, that is a Texan donating to an old-style Texas Democrat, and I have no knowledge of where Bentsen stood then on life issues, so can't speak to that.

Gore and Bentsen were Democrats. 'Nuff said.

BTW, how old was Reagan when he became a Republican? You know who convinced him to do it? I read where it was his daughter Maureen. Of course, he was prime and ripe to do it, it was just a hard thing for him to finally do.

Reagan supported Eisenhower in 1952, so he had a nearly 40 year track record of GOP support prior to running for the Presidency. He would've been 41 at the time.

But like I said, there is Ralph Hall who in Congress switched to the GOP after he was 80 yrs. old. He had the most conservative voting record in the House.

Is he the exception or the rule?

866 posted on 10/03/2005 6:20:34 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies]

To: floriduh voter
I think she'll go along with Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg, Souter and the rest.

Got some proof, or you just babbling on your one issue agenda?

867 posted on 10/03/2005 6:20:38 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies]

To: Christian Soldier

The first President Bush was lied to about Souter, by people he should not have trusted. That does not speak well of his trust on that nomination. But it is incontrovertible that he was misled. He really knew nothing for himself about Souter at all. But then, that's an easy thing to know and you just love to Bush bash. That much is so clear from your rhetoric.


868 posted on 10/03/2005 6:21:17 AM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 736 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

WTF is this?

Roberts I think will turn out OK, but who's this yahoo?


869 posted on 10/03/2005 6:21:17 AM PDT by RockinRight (What part of ILLEGAL immigration do they not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TTRR

This is another case of friends of Bush getting plum jobs.
I am sick of it.


870 posted on 10/03/2005 6:21:18 AM PDT by JRochelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 847 | View Replies]

To: MARTIAL MONK
It is. I'm gone.

I think I'll stay. My chldren and grandchildren are worth it.

871 posted on 10/03/2005 6:21:21 AM PDT by beckysueb (God bless America and President Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 541 | View Replies]

To: bella1

"Bush knows her personally, all of us here don't. Why on earth do we think we know more than he?"

It comes down to trust. GWB has a pretty poor track record on things that conservatives care about. Many, however, understanding the importance of judicial nominees, soldiered on, knowing that this was a huge opportunity to do something really important for the country and something for the many conservatives who supported GWB ONLY b/c of judicial nominees. He promised Scalia/Thomas....yet he give us something which we can hardly verify as being in the Scalia/Thomas tradition. The Bush supporters are simply left with this argument: Trust Bush.

That's just not going to get a lot of traction here.

A lot of conservatives simply don't trust him, and they have good reason not to.


872 posted on 10/03/2005 6:21:34 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 829 | View Replies]

To: kjam22

I am sure that some Republican Senators will be tempted to break away, but the costs to the party and Bush would be severe. Although this nomination may bring out the under the surface split which is already taking place in the party.


873 posted on 10/03/2005 6:21:38 AM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies]

To: Flint
"Someone" named Harriet Miers contributed to Algore 17 years ago. So far it hasn't been proved it was this HM.

Unless there was another Harriet Miers working for the same law firm, at the same time, it's the same one.

874 posted on 10/03/2005 6:21:42 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 843 | View Replies]

To: floriduh voter

So you're psychic? How long have you known her?


875 posted on 10/03/2005 6:21:49 AM PDT by RightthinkinAmerican (Is the Republican attack machine an assault weapon?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

There is one fact, Miers clerked for a pro-abort fed judge that helped get Roe decided.


876 posted on 10/03/2005 6:22:00 AM PDT by pangaea6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 846 | View Replies]

To: TTRR

Except Laura is pro-choice.

Now, I was more concerned that she be a strict constructionist. You can personally believe in something, without believing the constitution supports it. She will follow the constitution (hopefully).


877 posted on 10/03/2005 6:22:21 AM PDT by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 862 | View Replies]

To: jdhljc169

That's it your disappointed and now you'll cut and run.


878 posted on 10/03/2005 6:22:41 AM PDT by Patriotic Bostonian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: pangaea6

In the 70s?


879 posted on 10/03/2005 6:22:44 AM PDT by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 876 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

What a bunch of uninformed whiners. Already this AM Bill Kristol expressed doubts about her - boosting her in my opinion.

When you all get some facts come back and we'll discuss but until then I'm going with my President!


880 posted on 10/03/2005 6:22:46 AM PDT by HonorInPa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 855 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 2,941-2,944 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson