Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FEC: Nancy Pelosi's PACs Broke the Law
newsmax.com ^ | Saturday, Oct. 1, 2005 10:35 a.m. EDT

Posted on 10/01/2005 12:06:55 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch

Saturday, Oct. 1, 2005 10:35 a.m. EDT FEC: Nancy Pelosi's PACs Broke the Law

Two political action committees linked to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi have been charged with attempting to circumvent to legal limits on campaign giving, the Federal Election Commission has ruled.

According to the March 2004 FEC finding, Pelosi appears to have violated the same kind of arcane campaign finance regulation that spurred the indictment of House Majority Leader Tom DeLay this week.

The San Francisco Chronicle explained at the time:

"The FEC ruled that two Pelosi political action committees created to help Democrats in the 2002 elections were related instead of being independent and therefore violated a rule against giving more than the maximum $5,000 annual contribution."

Mr. DeLay, by then under investigation for his own campaign finance problems, reacted sharply to the news about Pelosi's campaign finance irregularities, saying: "She has violated the law. It's in the facts."

Pelosi operated two PACs: Tean Majority and PAC to the Future.

According to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Team Majority reported 16 contributions of $5,000 each from donors who had already given the maximum to Pelosi's other PAC. Five of the donors gave to both PACs on the same day.

Rather the refer the case to the Justice Department for prosecution, however, the FEC allowed Pelosi's two committees to negotiate "conciliation agreements" under which they were fined a total of $21,000.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: 109th; corruptdems; fec; hypocrite; lawbreakers; pac; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: InvisibleChurch

BTTT


61 posted on 10/02/2005 5:59:42 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

Her face would break anything.


62 posted on 10/02/2005 6:48:06 AM PDT by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

How come she always looks as if she has seen the biggest one in her life?


63 posted on 10/02/2005 6:50:05 AM PDT by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: unlearner
Not quite the same thing. She is guilty. He is merely accused.

Thank you for pointing out my error. You are absolutely right. I stand corrected. I learned from an unlearner. LOL Imagine that. :o)

64 posted on 10/02/2005 12:13:31 PM PDT by NRA2BFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
Pot meet kettle!!!!!!!!!!

I think her comment on the culture of corruption is what psychologist call projection...

where you project what you hate most about yourself on others... :)
65 posted on 10/03/2005 12:38:17 AM PDT by Americanwolf ("You are stuck on Stupid" --- Army Lt. Gen. Russell Honore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pocat

bump


66 posted on 10/31/2005 8:45:06 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: pocat

bump


67 posted on 11/01/2005 9:38:34 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I knew someone would have the dumbstruck, wild-eyed Pelosi image. Sometimes words just can't express it.


68 posted on 11/01/2005 9:42:22 PM PST by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

this is inexcusable! I call for her resignation!


69 posted on 11/01/2005 9:43:35 PM PST by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

This NewsMax article is a month old and there's been not one whisper about it from the MSM...not one!

I'm sending a letter off to Bill Deaver ( his brother was on Pres. Reagans staff) asking him WHY this has not been published in our local paper, on the front page and dark bold headlines.


70 posted on 11/01/2005 10:17:07 PM PST by AmeriBrit (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN CURT WELDON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
"Rather the refer the case to the Justice Department for prosecution, however, the FEC allowed Pelosi's two committees to negotiate "conciliation agreements" under which they were fined a total of $21,000."

Of course Democrats have the distinct advantage of not having rabid pit-bull prosecutors obsessed with pursuing them for even a traffic violation and hate-fueled special interest groups obsessively chronicling it and passing it to their co-conspirators in the MSM and on Capital Hill.

71 posted on 11/01/2005 10:28:19 PM PST by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

Indictment?


72 posted on 11/01/2005 10:35:27 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon

bttt


73 posted on 11/02/2005 8:38:26 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

bump to the top


74 posted on 11/02/2005 1:56:15 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: pocat

bttt


75 posted on 11/02/2005 1:57:37 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Please . . . Will somebody please post one of those Nancy Pelosi Bug Eye photos . . .

How's this?


76 posted on 11/02/2005 2:10:59 PM PST by One_American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

marker


77 posted on 11/02/2005 2:22:52 PM PST by GretchenM (Hooked on porn and hating it? Visit http://www.theophostic.com .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: One_American

bttt


78 posted on 11/02/2005 7:30:38 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: timestax

bttt


79 posted on 11/02/2005 7:58:39 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: theOffice

bttt


80 posted on 11/05/2005 8:40:14 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson