That will hold up on appeal...
Who is going to check to see if she is having sex? and who is going to pay to find out if she is having sex?
Looks like to me that this self-righteous judge is pandering for votes.
Seems to be in direct conflict with the recent ruling by the Oregon Sup Ct that public sex is a protected form of expression and therefore not to be prohibited in any way. I can hear the TX ACLU chomping at the bit on this one.
Also, it's not always the parents' fault. Some people are always going to do what they want to do and no one is going to stop them.
If she is one of those, she WILL land in hot water.
Judges should tell people when (or when not) to have sex? Judges are in charge of who can have a tattoo?
Do we love judicial activism so much that we want it down to such low level personal decisions? Be aware: I hope the girl follows the judge's advice -- it's good advice. But not something I think should be handed down by a court of law.
How can that possibly be Constitutional? I mean, I know it's feel-good and moral and all. But what about when judges on the other side come up with moonbat rulings like the defendent is required to read Karl Marx or something? Judges don't have the power to stop people from having sex. And if they do, they shouldn't.
Oh well. I'm sure she'll be fine now.
How can she ever get an abortion if she doesn't have sex? Silly judge.
Solitary confiement would satisfy all these requirements.
"But mom, everybody's getting these drug-culture tattoos and piercings. You people are so square and I can't wait to move out!"
While her rulings are kind of strange, I applaud her for having a dress code in her court room.
This judge has as much legal authority to order to *stop* having sex as she does to order her to *have* sex.
No sex? Why didn't the judge just order her to get married - that effectively stops sex.....;^)
Shouldn't her parents be doing this?
Prude ping!
But that will invade her privacy rights. It's an outrageous assault on her constitutional right to be a slut.
Will the judge or the state be providing a chastity belt?
Because a 17 year old druggie isn't going to listen
Does self abuse count?
I wonder what the meaning of is is here? Maybe the the 17 year old should check with Bill Clinton to find out what she can/can't do and not defy the judge's order.