Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver
While I applaud the spirit, this ruling strikes me as really, really stupid.

Judges should tell people when (or when not) to have sex? Judges are in charge of who can have a tattoo?

Do we love judicial activism so much that we want it down to such low level personal decisions? Be aware: I hope the girl follows the judge's advice -- it's good advice. But not something I think should be handed down by a court of law.

9 posted on 09/30/2005 7:49:18 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

Under probation a judge can attach special conditions. If she wasn't on probation he couldn't. Simple really.


17 posted on 09/30/2005 7:51:52 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy
Judges should tell people when (or when not) to have sex?

Parents should and do. In this case, the State is acting in the place of the parent for the good of the child.

While the ruling is practically unenforceable, so are many parental "rulings." Silence would be seen as consent, so the State is justified in speaking out.

24 posted on 09/30/2005 7:56:37 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy
Judges should tell people when (or when not) to have sex? Judges are in charge of who can have a tattoo?

Condition of probation. I imagine the yout' could always decline the terms of probation and remain in jail.

25 posted on 09/30/2005 7:56:51 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (When a Jihadist dies, an angel gets its wings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

Probation is not a right, and, if a judge sees fit to impose it, he/she may impose any condition she wants if it arguably is aimed at preventing illicit behavior. Only if the perp is violated because of this no sex provision and subsequently imprisoned would habeas corpus apply, ergo no immediate appeal. Sorry, libs.








42 posted on 09/30/2005 8:05:05 AM PDT by Dionysius (ACLU is the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

I'm with you on that. An unenforceable, unauthorized judicial decision is still an abomination regardless of whether the intent is good or not.


70 posted on 09/30/2005 8:38:28 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Aren't the "reality-based community" folks the same ones who insist there is no objective reality?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson