Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Intelligent Design Advocates Fight Back
Associated Press ^ | September 29. 2005 | JOHN HANNA

Posted on 09/29/2005 6:22:55 PM PDT by wallcrawlr

A group of Nobel Prize winners should have done more homework before criticizing proposed science standards in Kansas, advocates of the guidelines said in a letter Thursday.

Intelligent design advocates pushing new standards, which would expose students to more criticism of evolution, say the laureates' complaints are an attempt to suppress debate on the issue.

The letter was signed by Bill Harris, a professor of medicine at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, and Greg Lassey, a former middle school science teacher, who helped draft the disputed language.

"We all want good standards," the letter said. "However, demeaning rhetoric that does not address specifics but serves only to belittle and misrepresent the changes is not helpful."

Earlier this month, 38 laureates, including prominent chemists, physicists and medical experts, asked the State Board of Education to reject the proposed standards.

The laureates, led by Holocaust survivor and author Elie Wiesel, said evolution is the foundation of biology and that it has been bolstered by DNA studies.

Many scientists see intelligent design as another form of creationism, which the Supreme Court has banned from public schools.

Intelligent design theorists believe the complexity of the natural world cannot be explained except by attributing creation to some higher intelligence.

The Kansas board expects to vote this year on the standards, which will be used to develop tests for students but would allow local boards to decide how science is taught.


TOPICS: Extended News; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: anothercrevothread; creation; crevo; crevolist; crevorepublic; enoughalready; evolution; intelligentdesign; played; superstition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-191 next last
To: wallcrawlr

From your previous reply I interpreted it to mean you never went to sunday school.


81 posted on 09/29/2005 8:51:35 PM PDT by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey

Don't have to. We do not teach the Koran either. Sunday school is not a public supported institution.

Mute point.

Blessings, Bobo


82 posted on 09/29/2005 8:51:45 PM PDT by bobo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey
i like your tactics...using sarcasm to reply to sarcasm.

in reality, my guess is that i've been to a couple more sunday school classes than you.
83 posted on 09/29/2005 8:54:13 PM PDT by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: bobo1
Don't have to. We do not teach the Koran either. Sunday school is not a public supported institution.

Churches are supported by the public in that they receive tax exemptions. If it were a residence or business or even vancant land, it would be generating taxes so thus the church is supported by the public.

84 posted on 09/29/2005 8:54:22 PM PDT by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
in reality, my guess is that i've been to a couple more sunday school classes than you.

You may be right. I quit somewhere about the time they were telling about how women had one less rib than men ...

85 posted on 09/29/2005 8:55:44 PM PDT by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr

Talk about a major booboo ...

18 And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.
19 And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.
20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.


86 posted on 09/29/2005 8:58:17 PM PDT by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr

Another good open letter is here:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/368


87 posted on 09/29/2005 8:59:25 PM PDT by johnnyb_61820
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr

I didn't know that just anybody could add a keyword. I'm still new at this and learning my way around this site. There are a lot of terms I see and understand but don't know how to use them.


88 posted on 09/29/2005 9:00:25 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.Walt Meier, of NSIDC, said: "Having four years in a ro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: bobo1
Mute point.

Don't you mean "moo point"? It's like a cow's opinion. It just doesn't matter. It's moo.
89 posted on 09/29/2005 9:04:30 PM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey

property used for educational and charitable purposes is usually exempt from property taxes. in MN manure pits are exempt.

its not a good argument for determing if the gov has a right to walk in and make rules.


90 posted on 09/29/2005 9:04:48 PM PDT by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey
Churches are supported by the public in that they receive tax exemptions. If it were a residence or business or even vancant land, it would be generating taxes so thus the church is supported by the public.

Whoa! I think you might want to wonder on over to DU.

Churches are supported by concrete foundations (generally speaking).

Generally they get built and attended by people (who do pay taxes).

Occasionally (not as often as should be the case) they perform some pretty significant functions for the rest of the tax payers (such as feeding the hungry, clothing the nekid, housing the homeless, that sort of thing).

In those (admittedly a little too rare) instances that they do those things, they do it much better than the institutions which ARE supported by TAX dollars. And they do them WITHOUT tax dollars, but rather the donations from those tax payers who are too stupid and mindless to know that there is no GOD, and are tricked into donating their money for such purposes.

91 posted on 09/29/2005 9:06:51 PM PDT by GSHastings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey

Churches are supported by the public in that they receive tax exemptions. If it were a residence or business or even vancant land, it would be generating taxes so thus the church is supported by the public.

tax exemptions=public support? Okaaaaaaay.
Well, considering all the charitable work many churches are known for doing, I think the public is getting it's money's worth. Churches are certainly more effective than FEMA or any other gov't agency.


92 posted on 09/29/2005 9:07:22 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.Walt Meier, of NSIDC, said: "Having four years in a ro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: GSHastings
... Even the simplest form of life is not just extremely complex. It is UNIMAGINEABLY complex. That is a simple fact.

There was a guy named Emil Chargaff who as an elder statesman of biology when Crick and Watson were young Turks on the make. Chargaff was a proponent of the "unimagineably complex" concept, and held Crick and Watson in contempt for their naive belief that they could make progress by making tinker-toy models. He called them "pitch men" because the were always talking about the pitch of the DNA helix.

Then when the structure of DNA was discovered, it was said it would take 50 years to decipher the code, and it happened in less than 10 years. Here we are after 50 years and the human genome is laid out before you on the internet, and you're still stuck on "UNIMAGINEABLY complex".

93 posted on 09/29/2005 9:08:57 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: GSHastings
Whoa! I think you might want to wonder on over to DU.

Uh, if one speaks the truth here, they are pointed to the DU? hmmmm.

94 posted on 09/29/2005 9:10:59 PM PDT by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey

Actually it was the MAN who had the rib removed. It would have only been Adam who was short one. There's no indication that it would have become genetic and extended to the whole human race so where did that story ever come from?


95 posted on 09/29/2005 9:11:39 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.Walt Meier, of NSIDC, said: "Having four years in a ro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: GSHastings

I think I hit a sore point ...


96 posted on 09/29/2005 9:11:48 PM PDT by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: GSHastings

Churches are no longer holy places. They are now businesses paying outrageous salaries to the pastors that go to the highest bidder. The church buys the "pastor" inorder to be able to recruit more members and their donations.


97 posted on 09/29/2005 9:14:09 PM PDT by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Actually it was the MAN who had the rib removed. It would have only been Adam who was short one. There's no indication that it would have become genetic and extended to the whole human race so where did that story ever come from?

From the creationists?

98 posted on 09/29/2005 9:15:15 PM PDT by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew
Here we are after 50 years and the human genome is laid out before you on the internet, and you're still stuck on "UNIMAGINEABLY complex".

Poo Poo. There. I've just poo poo'd your argument. You're still stuck on counting noses and toes.

I've said it elsewhere on this thread, but I'll repeat it.

Evolution, and it's siamese twin abiogenesis, believe that life is so simple that pond scum was able to come up with it about 4 billion years ago (without the benefit of PBS).

So, let's get on with the proof that we are smarter than pond scum. Let's whip up a little synthetic life, shall we? How HARD can it be, for crying out loud?

99 posted on 09/29/2005 9:18:58 PM PDT by GSHastings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey
I think I hit a sore point ...

I'm sorry to hear that. Take two asprin and call me in the morning :-)

100 posted on 09/29/2005 9:22:26 PM PDT by GSHastings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-191 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson