Posted on 09/28/2005 8:00:37 PM PDT by Jean S
Do you want to know why the antiwar movement has virtually no political power, despite polls showing that a majority of Americans believe it was a mistake for the United States to invade Iraq?
Do you want to know why no major national Democratic office holder not Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.), not Sen. Harry Reid (Nev.), not Rep. Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), not Sen. John Kerry (Mass.), not Sen. Joseph Biden (Del.), not anyone showed up at any of the antiwar events here in Washington this week?
Do you want to know why antiwar mom Cindy Sheehan has lost whatever credibility she once had?
You can find all the answers inside the antiwar movement itself, beginning with the rally held Saturday on the Ellipse.
Organized by the left-wing coalition United for Peace and Justice and the neo-communist group International ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism), the rally featured well-known speakers such as Sheehan, Jesse Jackson and the pro-Saddam British MP, George Galloway.
Then there was the former attorney general-turned-radical Ramsey Clark. And Al Sharpton. And Ralph Nader.
And besides the well-known names, there were representatives of far-left groups such as the Socialist Front of Puerto Rico, the Nicaragua Network, the Network in Solidarity With the People of the Philippines, the Womens Anti-Imperialist League and the Global Womens Strike.
You didnt have to listen very long to the speeches to hear statements like, Hurricane Katrina has shown the racist face of genocide. Or the words of one former Haitian official who explained with what appeared to be glee that the United States lost the Vietnam War at home in the United States and will do the same with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
But those were the fringe figures, you might say. What about one of the few elected officials to attend the rally, Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.)? What was her message?
Pretty much the same as all the other speakers. McKinney told the crowd that the Bush administration, and more generally the United States itself, is a dark and destructive force spreading across the globe.
A cruel wind blows across America, starting in Texas and Montana and sweeping across Americas heartland, McKinney began. (Texas is the home state of President Bush, and Montana is, well, McKinney probably meant to say Wyoming, which is the home state of Vice President Cheney.)
It settled here in Washington, D.C., McKinney continued. And despite our presence today, it continues to buffer, to buffet and batter the American people. This cruel wind blew disenfranchisement into Florida and Ohio. It blew hard-heartedness into the capital, division across our land and wretchedness in high places.
The American people have been forced to endure fraud in the elections of 2000 and 2004, criminal neglect on Sept. 11, a war started on deliberately faked evidence, the outing of a CIA agent to cover up the truth, and now criminal incompetence in providing our security.
When hurricane survivors lost everything, it was there for all America to see. Sybaritic men wrapped in self-righteousness worked to save their jobs instead of the people, as dead bodies lay strewn about the New Orleans Superdome. Military recruiters blew into Houstons Astrodome to reap the harvest.
This ill wind that engulfs our country is also global in its impact. It dipped into the Caribbean, hitting Haiti and Cuba. It reached into Latin America to slap Venezuela. It swept death, greed and destruction across Africa into Eastern Congo, and it breeds occupation onto the peoples of Iraq and Palestine.
Add it all up, McKinney concluded, and youve got high crimes and more than misdemeanors.
Now, put aside the rhetorical flourishes sybaritic men wrapped in self-righteousness? and imagine that you are an independent voter. Youre concerned that nearly 2,000 American servicemen and -women have died in Iraq and more that 14,000 more have been wounded. You might be favorably inclined toward the antiwar movement, were it not led and populated by the kind of far-left figures who go around talking about racism and genocide and Florida and Ohio and the cruel wind coming from the United States.
But of course, thats exactly what they do. So you stay away.
Will the movement ever change? Can it ever change?
Probably not. Any credible antiwar movement would have to dump International ANSWER, as well as the kookier members of the United for Peace and Justice coalition.
But the chances of that are slim. When it comes to putting on big demonstrations, ANSWERs organizers are very good at the nuts-and-bolts stuff of getting permits, mastering logistics and motivating supporters to show up. Those are very useful skills.
So you are likely to keep seeing the extremists of ANSWER at the forefront of protests against the war. And as long as that happens, you wont be seeing mainstream Americans or their political representatives joining in.
York is a White House correspondent for National Review. His column appears in The Hill each week. E-mail: byork@thehill.com
Um, is it just me, or does the title have absolutely nothing to do with the posted article?
Me too. I kept reading and reading and reading and....
Who ever runs The Hill website made a boo boo
HAHAHAHAHA ... She couldn't even get that right
The Title itself indicates that "The Hill" newspaper posted the headline wrong.
The part in parentheses was not there when I first posted. It was apparently added later by the mods.
Commie traitors don't like potato salad?
I knew there was something sneaky that I didn't like or trust about those dirty rats.
They probably all eat tofu and sprouts too. No wonder they're all stupid traitors. They're brain dead from eating that stuff.
Did he spell it p-o-t-a-t-o-e by chance? Cause then they'd know he was a plant. eater.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.