Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Barone: The Tom DeLay indictment
US News and World Report ^ | 28 September 2005 | Michael Barone

Posted on 09/28/2005 7:44:37 PM PDT by Lando Lincoln

Tom DeLay has been indicted in Travis County, Texas, for conspiracy to violate campaign finance laws. Two DeLay political associates had previously been indicted. Under House Republican Party rules, DeLay immediately lost his position as majority leader, and the Associated Press has reported that Speaker Dennis Hastert has chosen Rules Committee Chairman David Dreier to replace him.

This is very bad news for House Republicans. DeLay has been astonishingly effective in rounding up majorities for legislation supported by the Republican leadership and the Bush administration. He is well liked by many members. I don't know how this case will turn out and cannot assess the validity of the charges. The Associated Press reports that "DeLay has denied committing any crime and accused the Democratic district attorney leading the investigation, Ronnie Earle, of pursuing the case for political motives." I don't think that possibility can be dismissed. Earle is a liberal Democrat, and in 1993 he brought criminal charges against Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, then comptroller and now U.S. senator; most of the charges were dismissed by the judge before trial, and the remaining charges were withdrawn. The case was summarized as follows by the Austin Review: "Earle's politically motivated indictment of Senator Hutchinson on charges that she used state funds to run her senatorial campaign made even his own supporters cringe. The charges were dismissed when Earle refused to present evidence at trial." The quotation is from the Captain's Quarters blog; the original is apparently no longer available online.

Democrats will surely charge that DeLay's indictment, that of White House procurement official David Safavian, and that of Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff show that George W. Bush's Republican Party is laced with corruption. I think that's obviously a stretch–both parties at various times have been much more scandal smirched than today's Republicans–and I think that the DeLay indictment in time may prove to be no more valid than that of Senator Hutchison, who has been re-elected by wide margins twice since the case against her was dismissed. But in the meantime, this is bad news for the Republican Party and gives every Democratic House challenger a talking point.

The House Republican rule that requires indicted leaders to step down was inspired by the indictment of then Ways and Means Chairman Dan Rostenkowski when Democrats still had a majority in the House. After last November's election, the Republican leadership, anticipating a possible DeLay indictment, tried to repeal the rule but after considerable protest reinstated it. I think that was a wise decision. It's not seemly to keep a top party leader in office after he has been indicted–however flimsy the indictment may ultimately turn out to be.

Is Ronnie Earle abusing his prosecutorial discretion, as he pretty clearly did in the Hutchison case? Our system of criminal justice gives a lot of discretion to prosecutors, who are chosen in partisan elections in most states or by partisan process as in the selection of United States attorneys. One of the good things about America is that the large majority of prosecutors, from both political parties, do not abuse this discretion in the pursuit of political goals. I've known a lot of prosecutors of both parties, all of whom took their responsibilities and their duty to be fair very seriously. But I've never met Ronnie Earle.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; barone; delay; delayindictment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Lando

1 posted on 09/28/2005 7:44:45 PM PDT by Lando Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Blunt, not Dreier, which is good news.


2 posted on 09/28/2005 7:46:01 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
this is bad news for the Republican Party and gives every Democratic House challenger a talking point.

Yes, Michael, if we start to live and die by talking points. We can choose not to though, can't we.

3 posted on 09/28/2005 7:49:05 PM PDT by Bahbah (Call Chuckie Schumer @ 202-224-6542 for your FREE credit report)heh-heh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

I hope this will be a "9/11" like event for the Republicans. No matter how much the Republicans act like Demonrats, the Demonrats will still hate them, still will say bad shiite about them and still will do whatever it takes to beat them, things like this.


4 posted on 09/28/2005 7:50:50 PM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
DeLay has been astonishingly effective in rounding up majorities for legislation supported by the Republican leadership and the Bush administration.

So why would he stop? He may not keep the title, but he still has a phone.

5 posted on 09/28/2005 7:50:51 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

Blount, I believe had an article in today's WSJ. The article appears to deem Price gouging okay to a certain extent... don't take my word for it, haven't yet read the paper.. Heard this on Rush from Tom Sullivan and was only paying attention with half an ear...
Just FYI


6 posted on 09/28/2005 7:50:53 PM PDT by acapesket (never had a vote count in all my years here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

I'm no fan of DeLay, but Ronnie Earle is a proven liar and grade A creep. I hope he get this indictment shoved up his ass.


7 posted on 09/28/2005 7:53:55 PM PDT by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Emmett McCarthy
I'm no fan of DeLay, but Ronnie Earle is a proven liar and grade A creep. I hope he get this indictment shoved up his ass.

Why don't you tell us what you really think?

:-)

8 posted on 09/28/2005 7:57:09 PM PDT by Chuck54 (Free Tom DeLay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Emmett McCarthy

You mean like this?

9 posted on 09/28/2005 7:58:04 PM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
I've known a lot of prosecutors of both parties, all of whom took their responsibilities and their duty to be fair very seriously. But I've never met Ronnie Earle.

That could leave a mark!

10 posted on 09/28/2005 7:59:36 PM PDT by Chuck54 (Free Tom DeLay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GBA

No matter how much the Republicans act like Demonrats, the Demonrats will still hate them...
-----
Lame stupidity and political cowardice keep trumping hard reality...and the stinking Dems just keep controlling the political agenda.


11 posted on 09/28/2005 8:00:58 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Tom DeLay has been indicted in Travis County, Texas

LOL, home of the forged National Guard memo. That place is a veritable hotbed of Democrat scum. I hope Dubya has something up his sleeve - - maybe some good dirt on somebody. The scumbag Democrats down there need a violent spanking.

12 posted on 09/28/2005 8:01:12 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Prosecuter hound dogging for publicity. Never mind that the charges have no basis in facts. Throw the shite on the wall, and let's see what sticks. How corrupt can a political party be?


13 posted on 09/28/2005 8:01:54 PM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chuck54

Poor timing if you ask me. Mr President, please introduce Janice Rogers Brown to the world, pay backs are a bitch


14 posted on 09/28/2005 8:01:54 PM PDT by DAC22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Two DeLay political associates had previously been indicted.

On the same charges?

15 posted on 09/28/2005 8:02:31 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChad

>>So why would he stop? He may not keep the title, but he still has a phone.<<

Good point!


16 posted on 09/28/2005 8:11:26 PM PDT by p23185
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

If Barone is as wrong about this as he is the political effects of immigration, then there is nothing to fear!


17 posted on 09/28/2005 8:13:46 PM PDT by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: acapesket
Tom Sullivan was off his rocker today. I listened to him and was so angry/ Don't any of these talk show hosts read or listen to what is said?

As far as the Republicans being at odds Blount said after being named House majority whip that it is temporary and they would rely on DeLay to advise them.

In an interview later DeLay said he had never seen the Republicans so united and fired up. It seems the media has missed the statements "I heard".

I truly pray that the Republicans get their spine up and do just like the dim wits do, unite and stick together!!
18 posted on 09/28/2005 8:13:46 PM PDT by frannie (Be not afraid of tomorrow - God is already there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Interesting.

Somehow what Delay did is a prosecutable offense, but somehow, John Huang, James Riady, Yah Lin Trie, Wang Jun and Johnny Chung being in bed with the Clinton fundraising is not even worth a mention in the MSM?

Trie, who was an Arkansas buddy of the Clintons, gave $460,000 in checks and money orders to the Clinton campaign. Supposedly they were from people all over the country, but were all filled out with the same handwriting and had sequential check numbers. Hmm.

Nothing to see there.


19 posted on 09/28/2005 8:14:40 PM PDT by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChad
So why would he stop? He may not keep the title, but he still has a phone.

So Delay is still going to lead the Republican party by phone, while he is under indictment.
This is a joke, right?

20 posted on 09/28/2005 8:15:29 PM PDT by Jorge (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson