Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anatomy of a Photograph (more media bias and omission)
Zombie Time ^ | 9/27/05

Posted on 09/27/2005 4:05:54 PM PDT by Brian Mosely

Anatomy of a Photograph



An analysis of a single seemingly innocuous photograph, and the pervasive media bias it reveals.


My photo essay of the anti-war protest in San Francisco on September 24, 2005 was not the only report done about the event. A few other outlets ran their own coverage. But the one photo from the rally that was seen by the most people was this:


Why? Because the San Francisco Chronicle, which had the only mainstream media coverage of the rally, published this photograph on its front page as a teaser for their article about the event.



Now, let's take a closer look at this image.


By chance, I took a photo of the same girl just a few moments later. Looks practically identical, doesn't it?

But you might notice that my picture is lower resolution. That's because it's a zoomed-in portion of a much larger photograph. I cropped off the other parts of the picture to get a close-up of the girl.

But what would happen if I hadn't cropped off so much? Let's take a step backward and reveal what the San Francisco Chronicle didn't want you to see.




Here's the same photo without as much cropping, revealing more of the context. You can see that the girl's protest contingent also sported Palestinian flags and obscene placards.

Now let's take another step back.



Here's my full original photo, uncropped. Now we can see that the girl is just one of several teenagers, all wearing terrorist-style bandannas covering their faces.

But, as you'll notice, the bandannas are all printed with the same design. Was this a grassroots protest statement the teenagers had come up with all by themselves?


To find out, let's take a look at another photo in the series, taken at the same time:



Oops -- it looks like they're actually being stage-managed by an adult, who is giving them directions and guiding them toward the front of the march. But who is she?

The last picture in the series reveals all.



It turns out that the woman giving directions belongs to one of the Communist groups organizing the rally -- if her t-shirt is to be believed, since it depicts

the flag of Communist Vietnam, which has been frequently displayed by such groups at protest rallies in the U.S. for decades.


The San Francisco Chronicle featured the original photograph on its front page in order to convey a positive message about the rally -- perhaps that even politically aware teenagers were inspired to show up and rally for peace, sporting the message, "People of Color say 'No to War!'" And that served the Chronicle's agenda.

But this simple analysis reveals the very subtle but insidious type of bias that occurs in the media all the time. The Chronicle did not print an inaccuracy, nor did it doctor a photograph to misrepresent the facts. Instead, the Chronicle committed the sin of omission: it told you the truth, but it didn't tell you the whole truth.



Because the whole truth -- that the girl was part of a group of naive teenagers recruited by Communist activists to wear terrorist-style bandannas and carry Palestinian flags and obscene placards -- is disturbing, and doesn't conform to the narrative that the Chronicle is trying to promote. By presenting the photo out of context, and only showing the one image that suits its purpose, the Chronicle is intentionally manipulating the reader's impression of the rally, and the rally's intent.

Such tactics -- in the no-man's-land between ethical and unethical -- are commonplace in the media, and have been for decades. It is only now, with the advent of citizen journalism, that we can at last begin to see the whole story and realize that the public has been manipulated like this all along.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: communist; deceit; enemywithin; lefties; mdm; mediabias; msm; supportthetroops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-182 next last

1 posted on 09/27/2005 4:05:54 PM PDT by Brian Mosely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

That is the kind of work which SHOULD be submitted for a Pulitzer prize but probably won't. Of all the worthless trash they give awards to, you just brought more enlightenment and understanding that 1000 NYT columnists. Kudos.


2 posted on 09/27/2005 4:09:11 PM PDT by bpjam (Now accepting liberal apologies.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

This is a really good photo essay, Brian. The way you steadily build your case is outstanding.


3 posted on 09/27/2005 4:09:16 PM PDT by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
Great article.

Them earrings on commie babe look pretty booooji to me.

4 posted on 09/27/2005 4:11:02 PM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Say it ain't so.


5 posted on 09/27/2005 4:11:03 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Murder and weather are our only news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Wow! Good work.


6 posted on 09/27/2005 4:11:30 PM PDT by fullchroma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
Brilliant essay. Just absolutely friggin' brilliant expose of the communist propaganda that masquerades for main-stream "news".

MSM are worse than liars, they are tellers of half-truths, and distorters of the truth. A picture is indeed worth a thousand words; this is especially dangerous when the picture is dishonest.

7 posted on 09/27/2005 4:11:37 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

The sad part is the fact that it's so predictable.


8 posted on 09/27/2005 4:11:49 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Great find! - suggest you send this to Drudge to see if he will also post a link - more folks need to see the bias going on daily!!


9 posted on 09/27/2005 4:12:34 PM PDT by VRWCTexan (History has a long memory - but still repeats itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpringheelJack

I can't claim credit for this. The Little Green Footballs operative "Zombie" did the work


10 posted on 09/27/2005 4:13:25 PM PDT by Brian Mosely (A government is a body of people -- usually notably ungoverned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

out-freaking-standing


11 posted on 09/27/2005 4:13:30 PM PDT by KC Burke (Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

PING


12 posted on 09/27/2005 4:13:46 PM PDT by ocr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Great job. Both the photographs and the direct and to the point writing of the essay.


13 posted on 09/27/2005 4:14:09 PM PDT by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Good work.


14 posted on 09/27/2005 4:14:24 PM PDT by EternalHope (Boycott everything French forever. Including their vassal nations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow

fyi


15 posted on 09/27/2005 4:14:27 PM PDT by KC Burke (Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
This is exaclty how the press biases the news. That's why I love C-SPAN. They once turned their unedited cameras on a gay rights protest in DC and got calls for weeks complaining about the full frontal nudity. Of coruse the mainstream press finds the most normal people at a march like that to show. If it's an anti-abortion protest, on the other hand, they'll skip right past the hoards of normal people to find the freaky looking fringe people.

That's why I always say that the easiest way to prove press bias is to ask a person to attend some events or watch them on C-SPAN and then watch the mainstream press coverage of teh same event. If they aren't dead or lying, they can't help but to notice the bias it's so overt.

16 posted on 09/27/2005 4:15:04 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Great post, Brian!


17 posted on 09/27/2005 4:16:31 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Wow. This is truly enlightening. Thank you very much. I only wish there were a way to show this to a wider audience.


18 posted on 09/27/2005 4:16:49 PM PDT by Windcatcher (Earth to libs: MARXISM DOESN'T SELL HERE. Try somewhere else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Excellent job.


19 posted on 09/27/2005 4:16:55 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely; Howlin; Peach; Mo1; Miss Marple

Come have a look.....


20 posted on 09/27/2005 4:17:01 PM PDT by mystery-ak (A soldier only dies if he's forgotten.....a Gold Star Dad...Mr. Wroblewski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson