Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread – The Most Underreported Story Of The Year!
Click on the link above!"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin”
Posted on 09/24/2005 8:52:55 AM PDT by s2baccha
The UN atomic watchdog adopted by vote Saturday an EU proposal that sets Iran up for referral to the UN Security Council, a spokesman said, in what would be a sharp escalation of the West's face-off with the Islamic Republic.
The vote was by 22-1, with 12 abstentions on the 35-nation board of the International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA spokesman Peter Rickwood told reporters.
IAEA -> Referral -> UN Security Council -> Debate -> Nuclear Iran
This is a major victory for us.
"Or else we will be very angry, and we will write you a letter, telling you how angry we are."
Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread – The Most Underreported Story Of The Year!
Click on the link above!"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin”
True. At least some of the euros are cinvinced that Iran has no intention of giving up its nuke program. In the end we will have to go in a clean the place out or have Israel do it.
Not only a resolution...but a STRONGLY WORDED resolution.
Agreed. Perhaps even the French and the Germans have gotten tired of being jerked around and played for the fool by the mullahs.
The euros of course are still in a position to triangulate between us and the mullahs and extract bribes, sweetheart trade deals, etc. from Iran in the same way they did with Saddam, by saying we're the ones holding the Americans back, etc. The French and the Germans sounded tough on Iraq until the very last moment.
What the French & Germans may not fully grasp is that the crazy mullahs are true believers, a different species of animal than the Saddamites.
I guess they hauled out one of those old manual typewriters and really "hit the keys"....so it was not only "strongly worded" but left a "marked impression"
IAEA Board to Consider Motion on Iran
Earlier, EU negotiators offered to make last-minute changes to satisfy Russia and China, who oppose reporting Tehran to the Security Council, where Moscow and Beijing have veto powers.
****************************************************
Today: September 24, 2005 at 9:32:0 PDT
VIENNA, Austria (AP) -
The 35-nation board of the U.N. atomic watchdog agency was to consider a motion Saturday that could lead to Iran's referral to the U.N. Security Council for violating a nuclear arms control treaty - something the United States has been urging for years.
The council possibly could impose sanctions if it determined that Iran violated the treaty.
But the final language of the European Union text on Iran was in flux before the International Atomic Energy Agency board reconvened. Earlier, EU negotiators offered to make last-minute changes to satisfy Russia and China, who oppose reporting Tehran to the Security Council, where Moscow and Beijing have veto powers.
Although board decisions usually are taken by consensus, deep divisions on the issue likely meant a vote would be taken.
A diplomat familiar with the talks between the European Union, Moscow and Beijing said direct mention of Security Council referral for Iran's "noncompliance" with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty would remain in any draft considered, but other language could be weakened.
The Europeans were "working on buying Chinese and Russian backing," said a diplomat speaking anonymously because of the talks' sensitivity.
He suggested the Europeans - and their chief backer, Washington - would settle for Moscow and Beijing abstaining from a vote on the text.
Russia and China, along with most developing nations on the IAEA board, oppose referral, but Western diplomats said a majority of board members support the motion.
Washington suspects Iran is trying to develop atomic bombs, while Tehran maintains its activities are for generating electricity. Britain, France and Germany have been negotiating with Iran on behalf of the 25-nation EU.
If a draft setting up the possibility of reporting Iran to the council passes, Tehran said it would restart uranium enrichment - a possible path to nuclear arms, diplomats accredited to the agency said. Iran also warned it could block IAEA inspectors' access, which it agreed to under a document not yet ratified by Tehran.
The diplomats - who sought anonymity because their information was confidential - said Friday that both threats were contained in unsigned letters and shown by a member of the Iranian delegation to the IAEA chief, Mohamed ElBaradei.
If signed and submitted, the letters become part of the official record.
The EU motion, as tabled Friday, calls on the IAEA board to consider reporting Iran to the Security Council. The motion mentions noncompliance with provisions of the NPT and suspicions that Iran's nuclear activities could threaten international peace and security, according to a copy obtained by The Associated Press.
However, the draft did not mention sanctions, in recognition of Russian and Chinese opposition.
Still, it was unequivocal in saying that - unless Iran ends uranium conversion and clears up questions remaining about its past nuclear activities - grounds exist for it to be referred to the Security Council.
A nation's failure to comply with the treaty is automatic grounds for a report to the Security Council under IAEA statutes, and the draft said "Iran's many failures and breaches of its obligations ... constitute noncompliance."
Additionally, Iran's spotty record on cooperating with an IAEA investigation that began in 2002 has led to an "absence of confidence that Iran's nuclear program is exclusively for peaceful purposes," the document said. That finding puts Iran "within the competence of the Security Council, as the organ bearing the main responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security," the text said.
The draft did not specify a time frame for referral, but outlined what Iran must do to avoid being brought before the Security Council, including giving IAEA experts access to nuclear-related documents and sites, suspending all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities and ratifying an inspection agreement with the IAEA.
The Europeans for years avoided U.S. demands for support in its push to haul Iran before the Security Council. They reluctantly swung behind Washington last month after Tehran effectively walked away from talks with Britain, France and Germany meant to reduce suspicions about its nuclear aims and began uranium conversion.
---
On the Net:
International Atomic Energy Agency, http://www.iaea.org
--
VIENNA, Austria (AP) -
The 35-nation board of the U.N. atomic watchdog agency approved a resolution Saturday that could lead to Iran's referral to the U.N. Security Council for violating a nuclear arms control treaty - something the United States has been urging for years.
The council possibly could impose sanctions if it determined that Iran violated the treaty, but that is unlikely since China and Russia, which wield Security Council vetoes, oppose those efforts.
Diplomats inside the IAEA board meeting said the European Union motion was approved by only 22 of the 35 member nations. Only twice in the past two decades has the IAEA board voted on an issue instead of adopting a resolution by consensus.
Twelve nations - including China and Russia - abstained. Venezuela cast the only vote against.
Washington suspects Iran is trying to develop atomic bombs, while Tehran maintains its activities are for generating electricity. Britain, France and Germany have negotiated with Iran on behalf of the 25-nation EU.
Saturday's approval reflected board concern over Iran's "long history of concealment and deception," chief U.S. representative Gregory Schulte said.
The board is "concerned that Iran's activities pose an increasing threat to international peace and security," Schulte said. "The IAEA has called on Iran to ... come clean."
But Iran's delegation head, Javad Vaeidi, said strong opposition by many board members reflected that "there is no consensus on the way forward." He warned of retaliation, declaring: "Threat invokes threat."
Tehran warned Friday that, if the resolution was approved, it could retaliate by starting uranium enrichment - a possible path to nuclear arms - and reduce IAEA powers to inspect its activities under the additional agreement it signed but had not yet ratified.
Diplomats accredited to the agency who requested anonymity because their information was confidential said both threats were contained in unsigned letters and shown by a member of the Iranian delegation to the IAEA chief, Mohamed ElBaradei.
If signed and submitted, the letters become part of the official record.
Diplomats inside Saturday's closed meeting, who demanded anonymity because they were discussing confidential information, said the EU draft resolution adopted by the board was the one submitted Friday after last-minute talks collapsed with Russia and China on modifications meant to make the text milder in exchange for Moscow's and Beijing's overt support.
The EU draft called on the board to consider reporting Iran to the council. As grounds, it mentioned noncompliance with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and suspicions that Iran's nuclear activities could threaten international peace and security, according to a copy obtained by The Associated Press.
The Security Council could impose sanctions if it determines that Iran violated the treaty, but the draft did not mention sanctions, in recognition of Russian and Chinese opposition.
Still, it was unequivocal in saying that - unless Iran ends uranium conversion and clears up questions remaining about its past nuclear activities - grounds exist for it to be referred to the Security Council.
A nation's failure to comply with the treaty is automatic grounds for a report to the Security Council under IAEA statutes, and the draft said "Iran's many failures and breaches of its obligations ... constitute noncompliance."
Additionally, Iran's spotty record on cooperating with an IAEA investigation that began in 2002 has led to an "absence of confidence that Iran's nuclear program is exclusively for peaceful purposes," the document said. That finding puts Iran "within the competence of the Security Council, as the organ bearing the main responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security," the text said.
The draft did not specify a time frame for referral, but outlined what Iran must do to avoid being brought before the Security Council, including giving IAEA experts access to nuclear-related documents and sites, suspending all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities and ratifying an inspection agreement with the IAEA.
The Europeans for years avoided U.S. demands for support in its push to haul Iran before the Security Council. They reluctantly swung behind Washington last month after Tehran effectively walked away from talks with Britain, France and Germany meant to reduce suspicions about its nuclear aims and began uranium conversion.
---
Associated Press reporter Andrea Dudikova contributed to this report.
---
On the Net:
International Atomic Energy Agency, http://www.iaea.org
They just changed the language to please everyone.
A resolution -- YIKES!!! A resolution that may lead to a (gasp) referral! Terrifying!!!!
Oh no, not the strong words! I can handle panties on my head--althogh it isn't easy--but I can't survive even the thought of strong words!
althogh -> although
Not true. In large part, Saddam's unwillingness to take the UN resolutions seriously was Chirac's clear position that they would veto any further action even as the inspections had fallen apart.
your link in 6 is hanging up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
