Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Able Danger: Witnesses now allowed to testify (DOD changes mind)
NRO ^

Posted on 09/23/2005 9:02:53 AM PDT by slowhand520

ABLE DANGER [Kathryn Jean Lopez] In from Specter's committee office: Washington, D.C.--Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA), Chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, will hold a second hearing on Operation Able Danger on October 5, 2005.

In the initial hearing held on September 21, 2005, the Department of Defense refused to produce five key witnesses relating to the identification of 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta. The Department of Defense has now changed their position and will make the witnesses available in a public hearing. The Committee will focus on obtaining corroborating evidence as to what occurred with the pre-9/11 charts and information which were allegedly destroyed by order of DoD personnel.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; 911commission; abledanger; atta; coverup; dod; hearings; whitewash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-208 next last
To: lilylangtree
You are absolutely correct. If we find out that someone in the Clinton adm. had the documents destroyed the MSM would report it as "Apparently some low level staffer in a former administration accidentally had the documents destroyed"
21 posted on 09/23/2005 9:19:33 AM PDT by slowhand520
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520

Keep the faxes, mail, and calls coming. It is working.


22 posted on 09/23/2005 9:19:49 AM PDT by bmwcyle (We broke Pink's Code and found a terrorist message)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520

Let's just hope that the witness doesn't go near Ft. Marcy Park between now and the time of the testimony.


23 posted on 09/23/2005 9:20:06 AM PDT by mrmargaritaville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
"Nice coordination with W coming back at Slick Willie in another article about BJ's failure to do something about terrorism and dead Americans during his 1990's 8 year orgy.

W needs to slam the libs badly again and again."


This need to be a coordinated effort on the part of ALL Republicans. I took a lot of flack here yesterday when I questioned if Bush is finally getting a backbone on this type of thing (not on the war against terrorists as some have thought I meant). I just see the right as the guy in the left corner that keeps getting jabs and under-cuts and just keeps dancing around without throwing anything but glancing blows. It is time to throw a barrage of connecting hits. They need to put the left in defense mode again.
24 posted on 09/23/2005 9:20:10 AM PDT by hophead (" Enjoy Every Sandwich" WZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520

"But why the change of heart? I hope the DOD didn't use arm twisting and intimidation tactics to these guys"

I can't believe they'd give up that easily.


25 posted on 09/23/2005 9:21:26 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener
...no longer trying to be "civil" with the Xlintoon's and hide their treasonous behavior.

Or am I being too optomistic?


I'll believe it when I see it. So far, Bush has been complicit in covering for Clinton, now for 5 years. Maybe Clinton's most recent attack opened Bush's eyes. But I wouldn't hold out too much hope.
26 posted on 09/23/2005 9:21:57 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: epluribus_2

lol!


27 posted on 09/23/2005 9:22:22 AM PDT by eyespysomething ("The Constitution is the court's taskmaster and it's Congress' taskmaster as well" John G. Roberts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan
I've never seen such studious ignoring of anything by the dems over able danger except maybe chappaquidick.

This lifts my heart. Go Schaffer.

28 posted on 09/23/2005 9:23:13 AM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520

Buddy ate them.


29 posted on 09/23/2005 9:23:21 AM PDT by auboy (Alabama The Beautiful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520
I think W is really pissed. Can you blame him after he was so nice to the clintoons?

W has taken off the gloves and will smack bill simple!.
He has gotten away with several times criticizing the President, and the old saying "give him enough rope and he'll hang himself"......must be working.

Don't mess with Texas!

30 posted on 09/23/2005 9:23:47 AM PDT by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Clinton must have really PO'ed W.
Gotta love it.


31 posted on 09/23/2005 9:24:04 AM PDT by golfisnr1 (Democrats are like roaches, hard to get rid of.>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Apparently, Weldon thinks that Rummy may also have some things to hide. I was listening to him on Savages show a couple nights ago and he mentioned how one of Rummy's deputies (Steve Camone or something like that?) may have been told about AD back in March, 2001.


32 posted on 09/23/2005 9:24:23 AM PDT by cwb (Liberalism is the opiate of the *asses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Good!


33 posted on 09/23/2005 9:25:45 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Judge Roberts will soon be Chief Justice Roberts. The RATS lose again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520
Not letting them testify would have been a REALLY bad PR move during war time. They're just gonna have to take their lumps & pass the rest on to the slimy Clintons.
34 posted on 09/23/2005 9:25:49 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware

That was my theory as well. Also, the hearings last week were overshadowed by the hurricane coverage. Hopefully, the new hearings will be held during a clear news cycle.


35 posted on 09/23/2005 9:26:03 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mware
By Rummy saying he would not permit open testimony the press jumped all over the story, asking questions. It now guarantees the media will cover it.

Excellent observation of Bush strategery.
36 posted on 09/23/2005 9:26:51 AM PDT by CaptSkip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mware
By Rummy saying he would not permit open testimony the press jumped all over the story, asking questions. It now guarantees the media will cover it.

Hmm, this makes as much sense as anything else. Don't go into the Briar Patch.

37 posted on 09/23/2005 9:28:24 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mware

Very ROVEian


38 posted on 09/23/2005 9:29:59 AM PDT by slowhand520
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520

Anyone still have Kristin Breitweiser's e-mail? I want to drop her a note.


39 posted on 09/23/2005 9:30:55 AM PDT by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520

thanks for the info!


40 posted on 09/23/2005 9:32:45 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@ God Bless President Bush As the MSM and Democrats Seek To Destroy Him.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson