Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senators seek to rein in gas prices [Major ignorance of Economics 101]
The News Tribune ^ | September 7th, 2005 | LES BLUMENTHAL

Posted on 09/22/2005 3:01:48 AM PDT by grundle

http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/government/story/5159838p-4693102c.html

Senators seek to rein in gas prices

Cantwell’s bill would focus on preventing price gouging

LES BLUMENTHAL; The News Tribune

Published: September 7th, 2005 12:01 AM

WASHINGTON – Sen. Maria Cantwell is drafting legislation to give President Bush broad powers to investigate whether oil companies are gouging consumers, and to impose price controls if necessary.

“No one now has clear oversight to protect consumers,” the Edmonds Democrat said Tuesday during a congressional hearing on the run-up in gasoline prices.

Cantwell said her bill, to be filed this week, would reinstate many of the powers granted President Nixon to deal with the oil and gas shortages of the 1970s.

That law expired in 1981. There is no federal statute specifically targeting price gouging for gasoline, according to the Congressional Research Service. Twenty-three states have such laws, though not Washington, Cantwell said.

In the week since Hurricane Katrina hit, gasoline prices in Washington have increased an average of 19 cents, even though the state’s five refineries are primarily supplied with crude from Alaska’s North Slope, with some imports from Canada.

Overall, gasoline prices in the state average 90 cents more per gallon than they did a year ago, Cantwell said.

“My constituents are very frustrated,” the senator said. “They want to know who is in charge.”

Tuesday’s hearing before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee signaled Congress’ growing attention to the higher prices at the pump. More hearings are in the works, as are calls by some lawmakers for price controls, a “windfall tax” on oil companies, more investigative powers and even temporarily waiving of the federal gasoline tax. All will face strong opposition.

“Most likely Congress will do little or nothing but talk a great deal and hold hearings,” said Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) said.

Industry officials said price controls would be a mistake.

Bob Slaughter, president of the National Petrochemical and Refiners Association, told the committee that price controls in the 1970s resulted in a shortage of gasoline and long lines at the pump.

“Price caps and other forms of price regulation are no more effective in the 21st century than they turned out to be in the 1970s,” Slaughter said. “Interference in market forces always creates inefficiencies in the marketplace and extra costs for consumers.”

Under Cantwell’s bill, the president could declare a national emergency. That would outlaw price gouging and allow the president to impose price caps. The bill would give the Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Justice and the Department of Energy stronger enforcement authority and require that oil companies and energy traders be more “transparent” in their dealings.

Cantwell, speaking to reporters later, stopped short of alleging that oil companies are manipulating the markets.

“I don’t have a document to prove it,” she said. But she added, “Production costs haven’t gone up in Alaska, so why are we paying more? There could be a lot of stuff going on.”

Cantwell likened the situation to the electricity crisis of 2001, when West Coast power prices rose more than tenfold in some cases. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission capped the price of electricity, but it took several years of investigation to determine that Enron and other energy traders manipulated the market.

The federal government does not have the authority to cap gasoline prices, the senator said.

Cantwell said she was not sure at what point price controls might be needed.

“I don’t know what the level should be,” Cantwell said. “But I know consumers should not be paying $5 a gallon for gas.”

The White House had no immediate comment on Cantwell’s proposal.

Cantwell said she had talked with Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid about her legislation and hopes it will pick up support.

Cantwell, who is up for re-election next year, bristled when asked whether her legislation was politically motivated.

“Why is this about politics?” Cantwell said, explaining she took the lead in calling for a thorough investigation of electricity prices in 2001 even though she wasn’t running for re-election. “I’m trying to take care of Washington state.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 109th; gasprices
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
This article is full of ignorance of economics, from both the politicians and the reporter.

Nixon's price controls caused shortages and gasoline lines. After Reagen got rid the price controls, the shortages disappeared.

If price controls save you $10 on a tank of gas, but you have to wait in line for 2 hours, and your time is worth $20 an hour, then the price controls have caused you a net loss of $30.

Prices are based on supply and demand. Just because it still costs the same to make the gasoline doesn't mean the price shouldn't change.

The article says that Nixon's price controls were designed to deal with shortages. That's wrong. It was the price controls that caused the shortages.

The references to "price gouging" show a complete ignorance of economics.

The reporter should have interviewed an economist.

California's not building any new major power plants for over a decade, plus their price controls on the consumer price of electricity, plus their ban on long term contracts for the wholesale purchase of electricity, were the real causes of their electricity crises.

1 posted on 09/22/2005 3:01:49 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle

I should have spelled that "Reagan."


2 posted on 09/22/2005 3:03:06 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle; All
Sticker Shock-$3 a gallon gas? Click the picture:


3 posted on 09/22/2005 3:05:01 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trakball into the Dawn of Information...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

"Prices are based on supply and demand. "

Not in this case. Prices are driven by speculation and profiteers who raise gasoline prices as soon as any possibility of a supply disruption is on the horizon, no matter how remote, and then take forever to lower them again, but never to the level they were at formerly.

Unlike corn, oats, or most other commodities, EVERY other economic factor is somehow tied to the price of gasoline and fuel - and if these piggish exploiters aren't called to acount and stopped, the ramifications of the increased costs will have a ripple effect on all other commodities and generate a world-wide recession - just as they did in the mid 1970s.

What the solution to price gouging by these international oil cartels is, I don't know, but something must be done about these thugs.


4 posted on 09/22/2005 3:08:58 AM PDT by ZULU (Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
The cure for high prices is ... high prices. It's completely counterproductive to control prices in this sort of situation: its no good having the government proudly boasting that "yes we know there's no gas, but thanks to us at least it's cheap"

and if these piggish exploiters

Ad hominem attacks on tradesmen aren't going to make shortages go away either.

5 posted on 09/22/2005 3:19:18 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Head economist teaching theory to Congress.



6 posted on 09/22/2005 3:24:22 AM PDT by G.Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

If the government would drop some of the federal gas tax a BIG difference would be seen but, we know the politicians will not do anything with their toy, money from the gas tax, money to just throw away.


7 posted on 09/22/2005 3:24:53 AM PDT by gulfcoast6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Bottle that whine. But no one buys it -- it's just dregs and bitters.


8 posted on 09/22/2005 3:25:06 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Someone should simply ask these Senators, most of whom are lawyers, if their legal fees were based on the cost of their rent, or the price of their furniture. If 33% is usury on a loan, then why not on the cost of legal services?


9 posted on 09/22/2005 3:29:09 AM PDT by shibumi (Not a Speck of Cereal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
“No one now has clear oversight to protect consumers,”

Wrong. The consumer has it. That sentence is the sand upon which the entire argument is built.

10 posted on 09/22/2005 3:31:31 AM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gulfcoast6
If the government would drop some of the federal gas tax a BIG difference would be seen but, we know the politicians will not do anything with their toy, money from the gas tax, money to just throw away.

Absolutely.

We should be drilling for oil & gas, onshore, offshore, and in Alaska, like there were no tomorrow.

We should rescind Jimmy Carter's muddle-headed EO forbidding the recycling of nuclear waste-- Europe's done it safely for decades.

We should be building next-generation nuclear plants ( and not just for electricity- any plant that needs heat, steam, or power coud use them ) all over the country. We have a nuclear plant two cities to the west, and it's far safer than the local chemical plants in terms of injury and deaths.

We ought to pursue clean coal technology-- we have a 300-500 year supply of the stuff right under out feet.

There's a lot, we could be doing right now.

11 posted on 09/22/2005 3:33:03 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trakball into the Dawn of Information...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: grundle
If the government is going to regulate what kind of vehicles and what quality of fuel citizens must use to transport on the governments highways then it's the government's responsibility to see that people can get the fuel a reasonable price without being gouged by an unscrupulous segment of the private sector every time the wind blows. There's laws against collusion to fix prices and using inevitable hurricane warnings as a code signal to simultaneously gouge is collusion.
12 posted on 09/22/2005 3:37:27 AM PDT by shuckmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

NOt suprising, Ask all 100 senators te recite the a.b.c.s and I bet half couldn't do it.
Lots of very ignorant folks in that body.


13 posted on 09/22/2005 3:45:06 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Sen. Maria Cantwell is drafting legislation to give President Bush broad powers to investigate whether oil companies are gouging consumers, and to impose price controls if necessary.

And who's investigating government for gouging people with their massive taxes? The level of hyporcisy over the so-called gas price gouging has reached unprecedented heights.

Last night I listened to the local news first on a misleading story of an increase in the local stales tax for Cobb county from 5% to 6% First the reporterette girl called it a 1% increase. WRONG. Going from 5% to 6% is a 20% increase. Then they called it a penny tax. 10 seconds later they then stated how many hundreds of millions of dollars it would extort from the serfs for the ever needy county. If it's a penny tax then it only raises a penny. But there was nothing but praise for the tax and a sympathetic interview with some fat trailer trash c..t who worked to pass the increase.

Then there was the bedwetting interview with some (black) single mother (with three chillin) as to how she was going to have to do all sorts of cut backs if gas prices continued to rise.

So I guess limitless increasing of taxes for which you get nothing is good, but increasing the price of a commodity is bad.

14 posted on 09/22/2005 3:47:20 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

" “No one now has clear oversight to protect consumers,”

Yes, the oversight is provided by the market. If you don't like the price, don't buy the gas. Walk, bike. take public transportation or buy a vehicle with better mileage.

If someone can produce a barrel of oil for under $70, go for it.

I pay more for a gallon of milk than I do for a gallon of gas. And I thought cows were renewable.


15 posted on 09/22/2005 4:05:25 AM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
“Most likely Congress will do little or nothing but talk a great deal and hold hearings,” said Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) said.

It excels at that....

16 posted on 09/22/2005 4:06:24 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Note to Congress: Better high prices than gas lines...


17 posted on 09/22/2005 4:07:13 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gulfcoast6
It makes sense, though. I mean, if you're going to get rid of a tax, get rid of a disproporational tax.

Even illegals have to pay gas tax.

18 posted on 09/22/2005 4:14:19 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: grundle
In addition of course, not a single congress member has advocated suspension of gas taxes, or the single blending of fuel rather than the multiple blends the Enviros foisted on the country.

Losers

19 posted on 09/22/2005 4:19:29 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

Here's one, built new refineries further inland and build a pipeline from the gulf. Hell put a refinery anywhere in west Texas and you won't here a peep from the enviro wackos.


20 posted on 09/22/2005 4:49:52 AM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson