Supreme Court's Ginsburg says at New York lecture `any woman will not do'

AP ^ | 9/21/05 | Nahal Toosi

[Neil E. Wright]

"I will take enlightenment wherever I can get it," she said. "I don't want to stop at a national boundary."

Hey GINSBURG, you stupid BITCH!!! Your JOB is to interpret laws according to the U.S. CONSTITUTION, PERIOD! That is the United States CONSTITUTION, not some fracking foreign law that supports your MARXIST position!

Its PAST time for our ELECTED so-called "representatives" to grow a pair and start IMPEACHMENT proceedings against these blacked-robed tyrants!!!!

[ontos-on]

No, Ginsburg is a woman. Women sometimes come like this. It is foolish to idealize one half of the human race and be blinded to what they are capable of.

[Vaquero]

Yes she was shooed into office even with her abysmal record as a strict de-constitutionalist by the Clitons and those stupid republicans who voted her in with an overall 90 something % approval by the Senate. By saying what she did she proves to have a bigger pair of yarbles than any of the republican senators who could not be bothered questioning her and voting against her.

Is there a third party out there for us Patriots??????

[VRWCmember]

"I will take enlightenment wherever I can get it," she said. "I don't want to stop at a national boundary."

It's not her job to seek enlightenment or seek to impose her enlightenment on us or on the court. It is her job to reach decisions strictly on the Constitution. She should be impeached for her comments.

[dr_who_2]

Here's to an ultraconservative W.A.S.P. being the next appointee.

[ClarenceThomasfan]

Boy I hope that President Bush nominates Janice Rodgers Brown or Priscilla Owen.

Can you imagine the tension in the Supreme Court lunchroom when Ruth has to sit next to one of them?

[muawiyah]

So, here's this Jezabel type person, Ginsburg, whose idea of advancing women's rights is to convince them to kill their babies and to allow the government to take their homes to give to the rich.

Quite possibly Ginsburg's appointment is one of the worst ever made.

[zipper]

Does this mean if the President nominates a big Hairy man who smokes cigars she will RESIGN???

Good idea! Rush Limbaugh for Supreme Court justice! Maybe she'll quit in disgust! At least he talks about OUR Constitution!

[Mark Felton]

I am outraged. It is not her job to "advance" anything. Laws advance rights, judges ensure their equal application, and fidelity to the Constitution.

She has failed and history will show we live in an embarrassing age of bigoted SC justices.

They are no different than the justice's who supported the idea that slaves were property.

[Libloather]

There are "some women who might be appointed who would not advance human rights or women's rights," Ginsburg told those gathered at the New York City Bar Association.

Can she name one? I doubt it. Ginsburg isn't the brightest bulb in the pack...

[Fiddlstix]

Amen!

[ditto h]

Listen idiot, the laws of this land have to be backed by the Constitution .

[Henchster]

"I have a list of highly qualified women, but the president has not consulted me," Ginsburg said

Hey, Ruth Buzzy, re-read the Constitution. YOU don't get to say jack-squat about who gets nominated, that is reserved for the PRESIDENT.

[satchmodog9]

I live in this fantasy world I guess. I have seen the type before, I just try to deny they exist.

[Pravious]

"...who would not advance human rights or women's rights
As a woman and a human, I don't think we need two sets of rights. Or is she saying women are not human?"

No, I think she's saying men are not.

Obviously, when it comes to abortion, she's of the position that men are utterly unimportant, worthless and powerless bystanders to women's "rights."

Seemingly, it's not enough for her that GWB nominate a woman (which, as I've argued before, I consider sexist on the face of it) - to please her, he must nominate a liberal, and preferably hideously UGLY woman. Then Ruthie wouldn't feel so lonely at nights, as she scours the arcane laws of outer Mongolia, looking for some justification for further subverting the U.S. constitution.

[Buffalo Head]

"Is there a third party out there for us Patriots??????"

Yes, there always is one. They chase lemmings into the sea.

[Ghengis]

"I will take enlightenment wherever I can get it," she said.

Sounds almost like desperation to me.

Seriously though. A Judge is not to advance anything. That is an attorney's job. Her admission of arrested development is damning.

[OriginalIntent]

An immoral, leftist sociopath president selected her (of all people, a radical ACLU marxist), then she behaves like a radical ACLU marxist activist, what an absolute shock.

She should be impeached immediately using this current 'spew' as evidence to go along with all the other overwhelming evidence proving that she is completely unfit to judge anyone or anything.

[hsalaw]

"As a woman and a human, I don't think we need two sets of rights.",

I've always wondered about this: I'm a woman, too, and why do I need a separate set of rights? I have human rights, and I have all of the freedoms bestowed by God - so why does my womanhood give me more rights? Oh, I get it: I was a "victim" so now I have, what's Spectre's phrase, "super-duper" rights? Ginsberg is another old 60s leftist hippie loon. Fade away, Ruth; go back to the ACLU (All Criminals Love Us).