Skip to comments.
Supreme Court's Ginsburg says at New York lecture `any woman will not do'
AP ^
| 9/21/05
| Nahal Toosi
Posted on 09/21/2005 8:10:54 PM PDT by Crackingham
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-171 next last
To: Crackingham
There are "some women who might be appointed who would not advance human rights or women's rights," Ginsburg told those gathered at the New York City Bar Association.Last time I checked the Constitution, this was not the function of the Supreme Court.
To: Crackingham
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
So much for the lie about Leftist Supreme Court Justices being unpolitical.
42
posted on
09/21/2005 8:32:09 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
("Don't get stuck on stupid, reporters.")
To: Crackingham
It's disgusting and frightening that this hideous creature is on the Supreme Court.
43
posted on
09/21/2005 8:32:57 PM PDT
by
isrul
To: Vn_survivor_67-68
It is inappropriate that a woman on the Court be promoting an individual group rather than enforcing law and the Constitution. R-B-G came onboard with the intention of implementing the Equal Rights Amendment by fiat. Based on that she is unfit to serve.
44
posted on
09/21/2005 8:34:26 PM PDT
by
jimfree
(Freep and Ye shall find.)
To: Crackingham
Ginsberg was an ACLU lawyer, and therefore not qualified to be on the Supreme Court. Imagine if Bush nominated a lawyer from the NRA legal staff.
To: Crackingham
Please give her JRB. Please!
46
posted on
09/21/2005 8:35:25 PM PDT
by
jimfree
(Freep and Ye shall find.)
To: Crackingham
Lord I hope that Ruth Buzzi Ginsberg is the next one to go.
47
posted on
09/21/2005 8:37:12 PM PDT
by
kennedy
("Why would I listen to losers?")
To: Crackingham
If not just any woman will do, then just make it Luttig. Bush has appointed more blacks, women, and minorities than any other president but is still accused of being a rascist. Just give us an originalist who might conceivably be confirmed. No further stratergery needed.
Comment #49 Removed by Moderator
To: Crackingham
Ruth Buzzi offers her 3 cents worth...
50
posted on
09/21/2005 8:40:44 PM PDT
by
tubebender
(OK...Whom stole my tag line???)
To: msnimje
"Does this mean if the President nominates a big Hairy man who smokes cigars she will RESIGN???"
Oh boy! That would be so great!
51
posted on
09/21/2005 8:40:57 PM PDT
by
hsalaw
To: Crackingham
We have had some pretty dumb Supreme Court Justices throughout our history, but can you imagine ANY of them pulling this crap with Presidents like FDR, Lincoln, Wilson, or Jackson?
To: Vn_survivor_67-68
Further confirmation from this kook Ginsberg that liberals hate traditions. I have never heard of a sitting Supreme Court Justice weighing in on who a president should select for the Supreme Court. It's an outrage.
53
posted on
09/21/2005 8:44:31 PM PDT
by
dennisw
(If you can serve a cup of tea right, you can do anything - Gurdjieff)
To: dennisw
I wonder if anyone else on SCOTUS will tell her what they think? Publicly?
To: Crackingham
Ruth Bader Ginsburg told an audience Wednesday that she doesn't like the idea of being the only female justice on the U.S. Supreme Court.My suggestion to her is to resign. Then she wouldn't be the only female justice on the Supreme Court.
55
posted on
09/21/2005 8:51:16 PM PDT
by
taxesareforever
(Government is running amuck)
To: NormsRevenge
Churchill remarked about someone that he was the sort of person who gave pedastry a bad name. Well, Ruthie is the sort of person who gives feminism a bad name.
56
posted on
09/21/2005 8:52:45 PM PDT
by
mathurine
(ua)
To: hsalaw
"Does this mean if the President nominates a big Hairy man who smokes cigars she will RESIGN???" Oh boy! That would be so great! Yeah, I think so. Unless of course, the Big Hairy man is Janet Reno.
57
posted on
09/21/2005 8:52:48 PM PDT
by
msnimje
(Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
To: Crackingham
There are "some women who might be appointed who would not advance human rights or women's rights," Ginsburg told ... If for no other reason, and there are many, this beotch needs to be impeached.
58
posted on
09/21/2005 8:53:18 PM PDT
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: ozzymandus
Good thinking! National Rifle Association President Sandra Froman for associate justice.
To: WarPaint
Exactly.
Ruthie is a partisan hack. Pubbies should have filibustered her.
60
posted on
09/21/2005 8:54:40 PM PDT
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-171 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson